A U.S. Army soldier from 3/1 AD Task Force Bulldog uses his night vision equipment before an early morning joint patrol with Afghan National Army (ANA) soldiers in a village in Kherwar district in Logar province, eastern Afghanistan, May 22, 2012. REUTERS/Danish Siddiqui

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Maxim Hot 100

The world's most beautiful women as chosen by Maxim readers.  Slideshow 

A cross is seen in Joplin, Missouri May 17, 2012. May 22 marks the one year anniversary of a deadly EF-5 tornado that ripped through the town, killing 161 people. The tornado damaged or destroyed about 7,500 homes and 500 other buildings, but the city is now well into a recovery mode that has spurred some segments of the local economy. REUTERS/Eric Thayer (UNITED STATES - Tags: DISASTER ENVIRONMENT RELIGION)

Joplin, one year after

May 22 marks the one year anniversary of a deadly tornado that ripped through Joplin, Missouri, killing 161 people.  Slideshow 

Court rules against Acacia in Microsoft patent case

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:54pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A Texas court ruled on Thursday that Microsoft Corp did not infringe on patents claimed by Computer Acceleration Corp, a subsidiary of patent warehousing firm Acacia Research Corp.

After a seven-day trial in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the jury ruled that Computer Acceleration's patent was invalid. The patent in question involved a technology that helps computers boot up faster and speed up the launch of programs, according to Microsoft.

In the suit, Acacia was seeking $2.50 per Windows XP license sold in the U.S. for a total sum of between $600 million to $900 million.

Shares of Acacia fell 25 percent to $12.90 in extended trade from its Thursday Nasdaq close of $17.15.

Microsoft said the original lawsuit alleged that Microsoft operating systems, Windows XP and Windows Vista, violated the patent but the court dismissed the charges against Vista on procedural grounds.

(Reporting by Ritsuko Ando and Daisuke Wakabayashi in Seattle; Editing by Carol Bishopric)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.