House GOP Frames Colombia Free-Trade Deal as National Security Issue
* Reuters is not responsible for the content in this press release.
WASHINGTON, April 3, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The following is being issued by the Office of House Republican Whip Roy Blunt. It was written by Timothy R. Homan and is from CQ TODAY-TRADE: In an effort to drum up support for the pending Colombia free-trade agreement, House Republican leadership has said a vote against that pact would alienate a U.S. ally in the region and signal support for Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and his anti-American policies. Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo., said Wednesday he has created a GOP whip team to build bipartisan support for the trade agreement, which faces vehement opposition from Democrats who say the Colombian government has not done enough to reduce violence against union leaders there. The Bush administration is expected to send the trade measure to Congress next week, but a House floor vote might not happen until the end of July. Blunt said Republicans will frame the debate in terms of national security and whether members support Colombian President Alvaro Uribe or Chavez, whose government has been accused of supporting rebels in Colombia. "Uribe is working with the United States, cooperating with the United States and trading with the United States," Blunt said. Sander M. Levin, D-Mich., the chairman of the Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade, said there is "overwhelming opposition" to the trade pact in his party. "The onus has been on Colombia to really establish some benchmarks of achievement," Levin said. Blunt said he has been "talking to lots of Democrats," but he didn't mention any specific members, noting "I'm not sure it's helpful to them for me to put their names out. ... There has been a significant effort to reach out to Democrats for 15 months." GOP lawmakers say steps have been taken by Colombia to limit violence. Previously, supporters of the trade deal have argued that the measure would level the playing field in terms of U.S. exports to Colombia. The deal would expand market access for U.S. companies by immediately eliminating tariffs on more than 80 percent of Colombian-bound exports of industrial and consumer goods. Colombia, Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru already receive duty-free treatment on many U.S.-bound exports because of recently renewed trade preferences to the Andean nations (PL 110-191). The Colombia pact was signed in November 2006 under fast-track negotiating rules (PL 107-210), meaning the White House can send implementing language to Congress and force an up-or-down vote from both chambers within 90 legislative days after Congress' receipt of the measure. Fast-track authority expired June 30, 2007. A final Senate vote would occur in September if both chambers make use of the maximum number of days allotted under fast-track rules. "If you want to ensure it's voted on this year, you have to send it up next week, unless you have a commitment" from the Democratic leadership to bring the accord up for a floor vote well before the deadline, Blunt said. Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has said expansion and implementation of Trade Adjustment Assistance -- a program to help workers left jobless by foreign competition -- must precede consideration of the Colombia pact. Last year, the administration issued a veto threat against the House-passed TAA expansion measure (HR 3920), saying it would create "a universal income support and training program." Several House Democrats were skeptical of the administration's plans to send the Colombia bill to the Hill. "I don't know really whether they [the administration] want to take a gamble and have this to lose on the floor," House Ways and Means Chairman Charles B. Rangel, D-N.Y., told reporters Wednesday. The House has never rejected a free-trade agreement in a floor vote. Even Democratic supporters of the Colombia pact said President Bush should continue talks with the Democratic leadership to gain support before sending the bill to Congress. "I still hold out hope that he doesn't use the nuclear option," said Rep. Gregory W. Meeks, D-N.Y., referring to the measure being sent to Congress under fast-track rules. The House must act on the measure first because it affects revenue. Edward Epstein and Richard Rubin contributed to this story. SOURCE House Republican Whip Roy Blunt Nick Simpson, Antonia Ferrier, or Chris Tucker, +1-202-226-7022, all of the Office of House Republican Whip Roy Blunt
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.



Follow Reuters