Cupcake makers at war over dot-in-circle trademark

LOS ANGELES | Fri Aug 15, 2008 4:28pm EDT

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Sprinkles Cupcakes, a California purveyor of mini-cakes beloved by Hollywood stars, has accused rival Famous Cupcakes of stealing its trademarked "Modern Dot" cupcake design to lure away clientele.

Sprinkles high-end pastries have made the rounds of U.S. media, from "The Oprah Winfrey Show" to "Nightline", drawing locals and out-of-towners who regularly wait in long lines outside the company's Beverly Hills store.

The company, which also runs stores in Texas and Arizona, accused Famous Cupcakes in a federal lawsuit filed on Thursday in Los Angeles of incorporating the "nested circle design" featured on Sprinkles cupcakes on Famous Cupcakes packaging, store decor, and "each and every page" of its website.

Unlike other cupcake imitators around the world who ceased using "Modern Dot" after being caught by Sprinkles, Famous Cupcakes has not responded to repeated requests to "promptly stop using its trademarked design," the lawsuit said.

The owner of Famous Cupcakes, who said on its website she began selling cupcakes door-to-door at age 7 and believes "one cupcake is never enough", could not be reached for comment.

Entertainment News From the Wrap

Photo

Cinematographers Awards: 'Tree of Life' is Top Film 1:49am EST

Emmanuel Lubezki wins for "Tree of Life." ASC Awards predict the Oscars' cinematography winner about half the time

Photo

Grammys: The Complete List of Winners 2012 1:34am EST

Adele dominates with record, album, and song of the year Grammys 2012

Fake Steve Jobs Ad in Taiwan Gets Clobbered by Bloggers 12 Feb 2012

East is East and West is West, particularly when it comes to American icons like Steve Jobs, even if he is portrayed as an angel

Photo

Grammys Honor Whitney Houston: 'We've Had a Death in Our Family' 1:02am EST

Grammy host LL Cool J strikes perfect tone; Adele delivers another stellar performance and her six wins include song, record and album of the year

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.