A woman holds her malnourished child at a therapeutic feeding center at al-Sabyeen hospital in Sanaa May 28, 2012. REUTERS/Mohamed al-Sayaghi

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

A woman walks past silkscreen prints of Britain's Queen Elizabeth by Andy Warhol during a press view at the National Portrait Gallery in London May 16, 2012. REUTERS/Stefan Wermuth (BRITAIN - Tags: ENTERTAINMENT SOCIETY ROYALS)

Long live the Queen

Britain gets ready to celebrate Queen Elizabeth's Diamond Jubilee.  Slideshow 

Photo

The autistic mind

Scenes from a home with two autistic children.  Slideshow 

Paulson calls for multi-billion dollar asset rescue

1 of 8. U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson pauses as he speaks about the U.S. government plan to attack financial market weakness by buying up risky loans at a news conference at the Treasury Department in Washington, September 19, 2008.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

WASHINGTON | Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:10pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson on Friday called for the U.S. government to spend hundreds of billions of dollars more to rescue financial firms from lethal mortgages that threaten to collapse the financial system.

"We must now take further, decisive action to fundamentally and comprehensively address the root cause of our financial system's stresses," Paulson told a news conference.

"We're talking hundreds of billions. This needs to be big enough to make a real difference and get at the heart of the problem," he said.

Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke have already put close to $1 trillion of taxpayer money on the line to keep credit markets working. Paulson said the latest action was the best hope of ultimately protecting the public purse and avoiding a grave recession.

"I am convinced that this bold approach will cost American families far less than the alternative - a continuing series of financial institution failures and frozen credit markets unable to fund economic expansion," he said.

Treasury earlier announced it would siphon up to $50 billion from the country's Exchange Stabilization Fund for a temporary guaranty program to shore up confidence the rattled U.S. money market mutual fund industry.

It was the latest in a number of dramatic government measures to prevent credit markets from freezing up over huge losses on subprime mortgages.

These have forced U.S. investment bank Lehman Brothers LEH.N LEHMQ.PK into bankruptcy, Merrill Lynch into a hasty marriage with Bank of America, AIG to seek a huge government loan, and prompted the state seizure of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on September 7.

Paulson made plain that such case-by-case steps were not enough, and called on U.S. lawmakers for a broader plan.

"The federal government must implement a program to remove these illiquid assets that are weighing down our financial institutions and threatening our economy," he said.

"This troubled asset relief program must be properly designed and sufficiently large to have maximum impact, while including features that protect the taxpayer to the maximum extent possible," he said.

He also said additional immediate steps were needed while he worked with Congress over the weekend and into next week to thrash out the broader rescue plan.

"First, to provide critical additional funding to our mortgage markets, the GSEs (government sponsored enterprises) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will increase their purchases of mortgage-backed securities," he said.

In addition, Treasury will expand the mortgage-backed security purchase plan it announced earlier this month to complement capital provided by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

"These two steps will provide some initial support to mortgage assets, but they are not enough," he said.

Many of the problem assets could not be bought by the GSEs or Treasury program, Paulson said, making it key for Congress to find a way to "remove these troubled assets".

(Editing by Andrea Ricci)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.