U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

All stimulus plans are not created equal

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Mon Nov 3, 2008 5:41am EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - As consensus grows on the need for a second U.S. fiscal stimulus package, economists say helping those most in need is the best way to ensure every dollar the government spends feeds directly into growth.

In particular, things like expanding access to food stamps, extending unemployment insurance benefits and investing in job-producing infrastructure projects would be most effective in giving consumer spending an immediate boost, analysts say.

"As soon as the checks are cut, it has an immediate benefit to the economy," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com and a supporter of Republican presidential candidate John McCain.

In the spring, the government spent over $100 billion on tax rebates for lower- and middle-income families. The intention seemed noble enough, but the results were disappointing.

Growth picked up in the second quarter but the boost was short-lived. The economy shrank 0.3 percent in the third quarter, its worst performance since the 2001 recession.

The U.S. personal saving rate, barely positive in recent years, spiked to a 13-year high of 5 percent in May as debt-strapped consumers held onto a large share of the windfall.

With the United States facing a likely recession, Democrats in Congress have called for further measures to help the economy. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi has signaled she may push for a second stimulus package in a post-election "lame duck" session of Congress.

The chances of fresh measures emerging are mixed. The White House has said it would prefer to focus on steps already underway to help settle jittery credit markets.

However, if Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama wins on Tuesday, majority Democrats in Congress might have a better chance of pushing a package through.

The effort received an important push on October 20, when U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke came out in support of a second round of stimulus, although he declined to voice support for any specific measures.

BRACING FOR WORST

While most economists believe a recession is inevitable, a severe downturn might be prevented -- and some of its pain alleviated -- by learning the lessons from the first fiscal spending effort a few months back.

Economists say that means focusing on measures, like access to food stamps and expanded jobless benefits, that target consumers who are most strapped for cash and who are therefore most likely to spend it.

"Not only are many of these stimulus options more effective, but they also have the added benefit of assisting those hardest hit by the downturn," said Ethan Pollack, a policy analyst at the liberal Economy Policy Institute.

In this manner, the composition of any stimulus legislation might be just as important as its eventual size

Which is not to say that size is irrelevant. Indeed, economists at Goldman Sachs write that "it pays to be bold" when it comes to such a targeted spending effort. They recommend spending on the order of $300 billion to $500 billion, definitely at the upper bound of what has been discussed in Washington.

"The larger the package, the larger the offset to the sharp decline in private sector demand," Goldman economists Alec Phillips and Andrew Tilton wrote. "A large fiscal stimulus package appears to be required to prevent an even deeper economic slump than the one we are now forecasting."

BANG FOR BUCK

Economy.com's Zandi says the ripple effects on growth from across-the-board tax rebates are too limited, while measures like breaks on corporate and capital gains taxes are at the very bottom of his stimulus hierarchy.

According to his estimates, food stamps and jobless insurance benefits yield the most bang for the buck -- $1.73 and $1.64 worth of economic benefit for every $1 spent. Next on his list, and high on the list of many others, are infrastructure spending and aid to the states, many of which are in a precarious fiscal position.

"While we're in the soup, it would be good to help out state and local governments that are under huge budget strain at the moment," said Lakshman Achuthan, managing director of the Economic Cycle Research Institute.

With the economy teetering on the brink of a potentially sizable contraction, politicians on both sides of the aisle might do well to keep such considerations in mind.

"I favor a stimulus package that gives money directly to taxpayers to get them through the worst days of the recession, which still lie ahead," said Peter Morici, professor at the University of Maryland's Robert H. Smith School of Business.

(Reporting by Pedro Nicolaci da Costa; Editing by Dan Grebler)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.