U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

FACTBOX: EU exec urges tough rules on credit rating agencies

Related Topics

Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:33pm EST

(Reuters) - The European Commission proposed on Wednesday a legally binding, centralized register of credit rating agencies in Europe as part of a tightening of regulation amid the financial crisis.

The proposed rules are designed to ensure high quality credit ratings untainted by the conflicts of interest inherent to the ratings business, the Commission said.

The following are some of the main points of the proposal:

* Legally binding registration and surveillance regime for credit rating agencies.

* Give independent, non-executive members of the administrative or supervisory board of the credit rating agency specific tasks to ensure efficient control.

* Reform their internal governance structure, introducing sound internal controls and reporting lines, clearly separating the rating function from business incentives.

* Disclose conflicts of interest in a complete, timely, clear, concise, specific and prominent manner and record all significant threats to the rating agency's independence or that of its employees involved in the credit rating process, together with the safeguards applied to mitigate those threats.

* They must limit their activity to credit rating and related operations, excluding consultancy or advisory services.

* The compensation arrangements of employees involved in the rating process must be determined primarily by the quality, accuracy, thoroughness and integrity of their work.

* Credit rating agencies must disclose the methodologies, models and key assumptions they use in the rating process. Methods must be kept up-to-date and subject to review. Credit rating agencies must also continually review ratings.

* The proposal obliges credit rating agencies to disclose ratings on a non-selective basis and in a timely manner, unless the ratings are distributed only by subscription.

* Require the use of a different rating category for structured finance instruments or the provision of additional information on their risk characteristics.

* Periodically disclose data on the historical default rates of rating categories and give competent authorities certain elements such as the list of the largest 20 clients by revenue.

* To restore public confidence in the rating business, credit rating agencies must publish an annual transparency report.

(Editing by Toby Chopra)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.