U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Automakers' survival a matter of U.S. security: Clark

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Sun Nov 16, 2008 5:36pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A rescue of U.S. automakers is important both economically and for national security, retired Gen. Wesley Clark wrote in an opinion piece in Sunday's New York Times.

The U.S. auto industry has played an important role in successive military campaigns, from World War II to today, and its ability to continue to develop new technologies is

imperative for national security, said Clark.

U.S. auto makers say federal aid is vital to their survival, and there could be devastating ramifications for the broader economy if the sector is not stabilized.

But a government bailout has hit stiff opposition from some, who question whether the automakers will be viable even with support.

"To be sure, the public should demand transformation, and new standards in the auto industry before paying to keep it alive," said Clark, who is also a former NATO supreme allied commander.

"But Americans must bear in mind that any federal assistance plan would not just be an economic measure. This is, fundamentally, about national security," Clark added.

Companies such as General Motors Corp and Ford Motor Co played an important role in producing tanks and trucks, and lending technology to aircraft and shipping manufacture during World War II, said Clark.

Their participation in today's military campaign in Iraq has been equally important, including the development of armor-protected vehicles, something that could not have been accomplished quickly without the efforts of the American automotive industry, he added.

"More challenges lie ahead for our military, and to meet them we need a strong industrial base," said Clark, adding that among the needs are better sources of electric power in vehicles -- something troops need to monitor their radios while diesel engines are switched off, for example.

"This greater use of electricity will increase combat power while reducing our footprint," said Clark.

"Automakers are developing innovative electric motors, many with permanent magnet technology, that will have immediate military use," he added.

Other areas where the military needs to harness the auto industry's expertise include developing an advanced battery industry in the United States, and domestic fuel cell production, which is expected to have critical military applications, said Clark.

(Reporting by Lilla Zuill; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.