U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Iraq drafts law letting British troops stay in 2009

Related Topics

BAGHDAD | Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:49am EST

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - The Iraqi cabinet drafted a law on Tuesday allowing troops from Britain, Australia and a few other countries to remain beyond the end of this year, government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said.

The law will cover the temporary presence in Iraq of the troops once a U.N. mandate expires next year, while paving the way for their withdrawal as violence subsides in Iraq nearly six years after the U.S.-led invasion.

The agreement with Britain, Australia, Romania, Estonia, El Salvador and NATO, must be ratified by parliament, which has approved a U.S.-Iraq security pact that allows the 140,000 or so U.S. troops to remain in the country for three more years.

It was not immediately clear under what timeframe the much smaller contingents from the other countries would be required to withdraw, but a lawmaker in Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's parliamentary bloc said he believed it was within seven months.

"The cabinet approved a bill for the withdrawal of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland, Australia, Romania, Estonia, El Salvador and NATO, and to organize their activities during their temporary presence in Iraq," Dabbagh said in a statement issued by his office.

While car bombings and suicide blasts remain common, the wave of sectarian bloodshed and insurgent attacks that followed the invasion to topple Saddam Hussein has begun to ease.

As Iraqi police and soldiers take on greater responsibility for security, the countries that joined what outgoing U.S. President George W. Bush called the "coalition of the willing" have begun to go home.

A ceremony for departing members of the Albanian and Moldovan armies on Thursday will mark the departure of the last of the coalition members who do not intend to stay past the U.N. mandate, U.S. military said on Tuesday.

The only ones remaining will be the U.S. force, which always constituted the bulk of coalition troops, and the others listed in the draft law drawn up by the cabinet on Tuesday.

Britain once had 20,000 soldiers in Iraq, but only 4,100 remain, mainly based around the southern oil city of Basra.

London has said it would like to pull most out by the middle of next year, leaving behind a small training force.

The law governing their continued presence beyond the end of the year will need to be approved by the Iraqi parliament.

The U.S.-Iraq security pact was fiercely opposed by some parliamentary blocs and was only passed after Maliki's Shi'ite-led coalition agreed to subject it to a referendum next year.

As Britain withdraws from Iraq, it is expected to focus on its role in Afghanistan, where the conflict has worsened in the past six months, with the Taliban and other militant groups stepping up bomb attacks and ambushes.

(Writing by Michael Christie; editing by Andrew Roche)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.