Three Top Economists Agree 2009 Worst Financial Crisis Since Great Depression; Risks Increase if Right Steps are Not Taken

Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:22am EST

* Reuters is not responsible for the content in this press release.

Full Session Video of Roubini, Rogoff and Behravesh Discussing Future of the
Global Economy at CERAWeek® 2009 with CERA Chairman Daniel Yergin now Available
at CERA.com
CAMBRIDGE, Mass.--(Business Wire)--
Three of the country`s most respected economists warned of a deepening economic
crisis if the banking system is not quickly fixed, in a wide-ranging
conversation with Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA) Chairman Daniel
Yergin and an audience of nearly 1,000 people at CERAWeek 2009 in Houston. The
full video of this panel discussion is now available to the public at
www.cera.com, providing unique opportunity for a clear, incisive, and in-depth
understanding of the great challenges facing the U.S. and world economy and the
possible solutions. 

Nouriel Roubini, professor of economics and international business at New York
University, Kenneth Rogoff, professor of economics and public policy at Harvard
University, and Nariman Behravesh, chief economist and executive vice president
for IHS Global Insight, all agreed that this is the worst financial crisis since
the Great Depression. 

Rogoff, formerly chief economist at the International Monetary Fund (IMF),
described the current recession as "a once in a 50-year event." He said that
"2009 basically is a write-off" but added, "I`m `constructive` about 2010 in
that we`ll have tepid growth in the world economy. It`s unusual for a recession
to last more than two years. However, it will be very slow coming out of it. The
big growth will be in some of the emerging markets. It`s the developed countries
where the biggest hurt is occurring." 

Rogoff argued that the $790 billion stimulus bill is only part of the answer.
"It`s like giving a blood transfusion while the patient is still bleeding," he
said. "If we`re not going to fix the banking system at the same time, then it`s
just a temporary boost in the economy. We have simply not taken the proper
decisive action with the banks." 

Roubini, also chairman of RGE Monitor, said: "Even if we have positive growth
next year, say one percent, it`s going to feel like a recession even if we`re
out of it. If we don`t get the monetary part right, the fiscal policy right, if
we don`t fix the banking system the right way, if we don`t deal with the debt
burden of the household sector I see a one-third possibility of (an extended)
L-shaped Japanese stagnation." 

Behravesh disagreed. "This is the Great Recession, not the Great Depression 2.0
and not Japan in the last decade," he said. "We`re seeing a different policy
response than what we saw during the Depression and Japan in the 1990s. It took
Japan seven years to deal with its banking crisis. The U.S. has moved in a
matter of months and it`s had some fiscal effect. Our fiscal stimulus may not be
enough or the right kind, but it`s much different than the Depression or Japan."


Behravesh forecasts a decline in gross domestic product for 2009 in the U.S of
2.5 to 3.0 percent and a global decline in GDP of 1.0 to 1.5 percent. 

Why did people not see the vulnerability of the U.S. economy to an economic
bust? "Whenever you have an environment where there`s a giant influx of money
into your country -- and here it was coming out of emerging markets -- it gives
an illusion that things are better than they really are," Rogoff explained. "You
lose your judgment. At the heart of what happened is that we lost perspective on
what was real and what was really fueled by these low interest rates, this
influx of money." 

When asked by Yergin, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of The Prize: The Epic Quest
for Oil, Money and Power, (in a new, 2009 edition) about the role that oil might
have played in the economic downturn, Roubini, said: "The financial crisis would
have led to a severe downturn in oil prices anyway. I would not be surprised if
oil prices fell below $30 later this year. There could be even further weakness
in oil prices unless OPEC is able to cut production even further." 

Behravesh, author of the recently published book Spin-Free Economics: A
No-Nonsense, Nonpartisan Guide to Today's Global Economic Debates, pointed to
China as having the ability to maintain some economic growth which could "help
oil prices get to the $50-60 range sometime next year." Rogoff added that oil
prices could be "shooting back up when the downturn ends and economies grow.
That`s what the historical record shows. The oil price will rise again as the
developing world grows." 

All three agreed that the economic stimulus plan is needed, but it alone will
not fix the nation`s economic problems. "If there is not an increase in
government spending then the contraction will be more severe," Roubini said.
"However, tax cuts will not make a difference. Last year`s tax cuts were mostly
saved. Infrastructure spending will take a long time as there are few projects
`shovel ready` so the overall impact of the stimulus may be smaller. 

"People worry about the housing bust and the drop in consumption," he added,
"but the biggest story is the drop in capital spending. Corporations are
concerned about whether they will survive so we`re seeing a global collapse of
(capital) spending. That`s why something must be done on the stimulus side to
diminish the contraction of economic activity." 

Behravesh added that the old relationship between a consumer-dependent U.S. and
an export-dependent world would also need to change. "There is a pent-up demand
on the part of businesses, consumers and households in terms of homes and
consumer durables. Now everybody`s scared and they`re not spending. The question
is `when does that pent-up demand get unleashed?` That could come back very
strongly. We tend to underestimate that. In boom times, there`s a tendency to
think the business cycle`s dead. The same problem occurs in a bust - that we`ll
never get out of this." 

"There has to be a fundamental change in the debt-financed consumer spending in
the U.S. and the addiction to exports of other countries," he concluded. 

CERA and IHS Global Insight are IHS Inc. companies (NYSE: IHS). 

About CERA (www.cera.com)

Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA), an IHS company, is a leading
advisor to energy companies, consumers, financial institutions, technology
providers and governments. CERA (www.cera.com) delivers strategic knowledge and
independent analysis on energy markets, geopolitics, industry trends, and
strategy. CERA is based in Cambridge, MA, and has offices in Bangkok, Beijing,
Calgary, Dubai, Johannesburg, Mexico City, Moscow, Mumbai, Oslo, Paris, Rio de
Janeiro, San Francisco, Tokyo and Washington, DC. 

About IHS (www.ihs.com)

IHS (NYSE: IHS) is a leading global source of critical information and insight,
dedicated to providing the most complete and trusted data and expertise. IHS
product and service solutions span four areas of information that encompass the
most important concerns facing global business today: Energy, Product Lifecycle,
Security and Environment. It serves customers ranging from governments and
multinational companies to smaller companies and technical professionals in more
than 180 countries. IHS is celebrating its 50th anniversary in 2009 and employs
approximately 3,800 people in 20 countries. 

IHS is a registered trademark of IHS Inc. CERA is a registered trademark of
Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. Copyright ©2009 IHS Inc. All rights
reserved.



IHS
David Pendery, 303-397-2468
david.pendery@ihs.com
or
IHS Press Desk, 303-305-8021
press@ihs.com



Copyright Business Wire 2009

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.