U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

SNAP ANALYSIS: Possible fallout from China-U.S. naval standoff

Related Topics

BEIJING | Tue Mar 10, 2009 12:34am EDT

BEIJING (Reuters) - A confrontation between a U.S. navy ship and Chinese naval vessels off the Chinese island of Hainan has raised tensions between the two sides at a time of global economic crisis. Here are some of the potential consequences.

* ECONOMIC TIES INSULATED - The United States and China are deeply interdependent in trade and financial flows. The U.S. buys more Chinese exports than any other nation, and Beijing is a major holder of U.S. government bonds. The naval flare-up appears unlikely to escalate into a confrontation that could seriously impede their negotiations over tackling the global economic slump ahead of a G20 summit in April.

"Overall, this won't have a major impact, because financially the United States needs China too much, and China also needs the United States," said Shi Yinhong of Renmin University in Beijing.

* CHINESE MILITARY MORE PRICKLY - China has long been sensitive about actions it sees as slighting or violating its sovereignty, and that wariness is likely to grow as Beijing seeks to modernize and extend its naval forces.

Chinese People's Liberation Army commanders have said they are looking to build the country's first aircraft carrier, and Hainan island is also the site of a naval base that houses ballistic missile submarines, according to independent analysts.

"For some years now we've seen China sending a signal to the United States that they expect to be accorded a certain amount of respect," said Denny Roy, an expert on Asia-Pacific security at the East-West Center in Honolulu, Hawaii.

Roy said the confrontation may spur the two countries' to move faster to agreements on averting dangerous clashes at sea.

Washington and Beijing have resumed military contacts after months of icy anger from China over U.S. military sales to Taiwan, and a Pentagon official, David Sedney, has said recent defense talks between the two sides were candid and helpful.

"But if this (incident) is indicative of a longer-term trend toward China wanting to assume the usual attributes of a great power, then we may be in for more Cold War-style incidents sooner than we might expect," Roy said.

* OIL MARKETS JUMP BUT LIKELY TO CALM DOWN - In a knee-jerk reaction to heightened geopolitical risks after the confrontation, oil prices rose Monday. But analysts said it was hard to see how tension between the world's two biggest oil consumers could threaten supplies or inflate prices.

"I can see the geopolitical risk between two producing countries. But the U.S. and China are two major consumers. I don't know why oil prices would rise on that," said Tony Nunan, risk management manager at Tokyo-based Mitsubishi Corp.

* COMPLICATING COMPROMISE - China's Communist Party leaders worry about maintaining authority in their government, with their military forces and with the wider public, which is often ardently nationalist.

In past years, clashes between China and the United States have then made it more difficult for Beijing's leaders to openly compromise with Washington in trade, security and other issues for fear of riling these domestic constituencies.

After U.S. bombs destroyed the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade during the NATO campaign of 1999, Beijing rejected U.S. claims the deadly attack was an accident. Tensions took many months to ease. Likewise, after a U.S. military plane was forced down on Hainan in 2001, tensions persisted until the September 11 attacks drew the two sides together.

The confrontation on Sunday lacks the severity and length of those two incidents, and its impact is likely to be less. But for now, it could cool friendly talk from Beijing.

(Editing by Dean Yates)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.