Banks Uncomfortable With Spending Restrictions of Taxpayer Bailout Money

* Reuters is not responsible for the content in this press release.

Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:44pm EDT

NEW YORK, March 24 /PRNewswire/ -- As history has shown and continues to
prove, every time the U.S. government gets involved with something, whatever
it is becomes slower, costs more, and satisfies less. James Wilson from
ForeclosureWarehouse.com stated that our recent taxpayer-backed funds known as
the economic stimulus plan has too little oversight according to citizens and
many in government, and too many restrictions and controls according to some
recipients. Because of executive pay restrictions, several banks of varying
sizes have decided to give the money they received back or refuse it.

The funds were originally needed, it was proposed, to avoid collapse of
financial institutions, but has exposed the willingness of banks to spend the
money as they see fit, on corporate extravagance like jets and executive
bonuses, and supporting local community projects like zoos and opera
companies, for example.

The banks dislike being told that in order to receive the money from the
stimulus plans intended to keep them from collapsing, the banks must postpone
evictions, modify mortgages for distressed homeowners, slash dividends, cancel
employee training and morale-building exercises, withdraw offers of employment
to foreigners, and allow shareholders to vote on their executive pay packages.

If the government were restricted in the same way by the citizens, such as the
repeated use of military aircraft to fly willy-nilly at the discretion of the
speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, at the taxpayers' expense, for example, it
is certain that the government would loudly complain.

And who can blame the citizens for wanting to rein in the spending of the
government, something the government has never done and continues not to do.

Some say that the stimulus package conditions don't go far enough, while
others complain of fascism - privately owned companies controlled by the
government.

James Wilson agrees with banking experts who warn that expecting weak banks to
carry out the policies of the government could exacerbate the situation,
forcing banks to engage in lending practices that cause them more losses and
places them into more precarious positions, involving the government even
more, or closing their doors for good.

It has been reported that some in government, like Barney Frank and Chris
Dodd, had for years, encouraged or pressured lending institutions Freddie Mac
and Fannie Mae, to approve loans to more people that traditionally would not
qualify for loans for the purpose of allowing more people to own their homes.
Now that the government controls these two companies, these lenders have been
told to spend billions of dollars buying bundles of mortgages (of which there
are no buyers), and to allow homeowners to refinance their loans even with no
equity on the part of the borrower. In other words, the banks will lose less
money than by receiving foreclosed properties that would have to be sold at a
discounted price resulting in a greater loss.

This scenario is similar to a gangster putting a gun to someone's head and
telling them to "buy, or else." But public outrage over the continuously
growing size of not one but several stimulus packages has pressured
politicians to exercise more control over how the taxpayers' money will be
used, or will not be used by the banks and businesses receiving part of the
bailout.

Government mandates that banks must approve loans and must wait longer to
collect their repayment, yet must not evict people who cannot repay their
obligations leading to further bank losses and expenses. Keeping insolvent
banks operational merely prolongs the inevitable collapse due to the weakening
of the banks and their inability to collect money owed to them from borrowers.


More information: http://www.foreclosurewarehouse.com

*(LOGO 72dpi: Send2Press.com/mediaboom/09-0324-FCwarehs_72dpi.jpg)

This release was issued on behalf of the above organization by Send2Press(R),
a unit of Neotrope(R). http://www.Send2Press.com



SOURCE  ForeclosureWarehouse.com

James Wilson of ForeclosureWarehouse.com, +1-646-502-9455,
support@foreclosurewarehouse.com
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.