Fitch Explores SF Concentration Risk in Basel II Proposals
* Reuters is not responsible for the content in this press release.
LONDON & NEW YORK--(Business Wire)-- Fitch Ratings explores the issue of concentration risk in a report that comments on recent Basel II proposals responding to the financial crisis. While the overall proposals provide meaningful enhancements that will further strengthen the effectiveness and rigor of the Basel II capital framework, Fitch's analysis indicates that specific aspects could have unintended effects on the risk-sensitivity of capital requirements for structured finance exposures. Fitch notes potential overlap between Fitch's tightened SF CDO rating criteria and proposed increases in Basel II risk-weights on 're-securitization' exposures held by banks, which could result in the 'double-counting' of risks within SF CDO capital charges. Addressing concentrations is an important element of measuring and managing risks within securitization transactions, particularly re-securitizations such as SF CDOs, or collateralized debt obligations backed by an underlying pool of structured finance securities. Fitch recently developed revised rating criteria for SF CDOs that apply a rigorous and robust treatment of potential risk concentrations within these structures. As a result, the enhancement levels needed to achieve investment-grade ratings have increased considerably, particularly for collateral pools characterized by risk concentrations and thinner tranches. However, as part of the proposed Basel II enhancements under Pillar 1, which addresses minimum regulatory capital requirements for banks, the risk weights for 're-securitizations' such as SF CDOs will be increased relative to the risk-weights on other forms of securitization exposure. "One of the main factors driving recent SF CDO credit deterioration has been risk concentrations within the underlying pool of structured finance collateral to the same asset classes, geographic areas, and, importantly, vintages, since assets originated within the same time period are exposed to similar underwriting risk factors," said John Olert, Group Managing Director, Fitch Structured Finance group. "With both Fitch tightening its SF CDO rating criteria and Basel II increasing the associated capital charges on re-securitizations, it appears that there is a potential overlap in these efforts especially if other agencies make similar changes to their criteria." "In concept, similar risk exposures should face similar capital charges, irrespective of the form that the exposure takes. When layering the higher proposed Basel II re-securitization charges onto the additional conservatism of Fitch's SF CDO criteria, our analysis indicates that the Basel II capital charges on the full SF CDO capital structure could be several multiples higher than the Basel II charges on the entire underlying pool of structured finance collateral, even though the risk exposure is essentially the same," said Ian Linnell, Group Managing Director, Fitch Structured Finance group. The Basel II capital framework, currently being implemented globally, is a significant regulation that Fitch believes will promote stronger risk management practices and more informative measures of risk-based capital within the banking industry. The proposed enhancements address each of the 'Pillars' of Basel II, including Pillar 1, minimum regulatory capital requirements; Pillar 2, banks' internal risk and capital assessments and the supervisory review process; and Pillar 3, risk-based disclosure to promote market discipline. As emphasized by the Basel Committee in releasing the proposals, Basel II is intended to be a 'living framework' that continues to adapt to evolution in financial markets and the financial services industry, which Fitch notes will help to support its relevance going forward. The report 'Basel II's Proposed Enhancements: Focus on Concentration Risk' is available on Fitch's website at www.fitchratings.com; Annex 2 of the report illustrates the potential impact of Fitch's revised ratings criteria and the Basel II re-securitization proposals on the capital charges for SF CDOs. The website requires users to perform a simple log-on process. The report can be found by linking to 'Credit Market Research' (under 'Market Focus') and then clicking on 'Research'. Fitch's rating definitions and the terms of use of such ratings are available on the agency's public site, www.fitchratings.com. Published ratings, criteria and methodologies are available from this site, at all times. Fitch's code of conduct, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, affiliate firewall, compliance and other relevant policies and procedures are also available from the 'Code of Conduct' section of this site. Fitch Ratings Stuart Jennings, +1 44 20 7417 6271 (London) Krishnan Ramadurai, +1 44 20 7417 3480 (London) Ian Linnell, +1 44 20 7417 4344 (London) Martin Hansen, +1-212-908-9190 (New York) John Olert, +1-212-908-0663 (New York) Media Relations Julian Dennison, +44 020 7682 7480 (London) julian.dennison@fitchratings.com Sandro Scenga, +1-212-908-0278 (New York) sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com Copyright Business Wire 2009
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.



Follow Reuters