Health Reform Debate: Advocates Urge Congress to Learn from Examples of Disease Management Programs Working in Ohio
* Reuters is not responsible for the content in this press release.
Many Ohio Employers Achieve Cost Savings, Improved Health Outcomes Through Disease Management and Wellness Programs COLUMBUS, Ohio--(Business Wire)-- As Congress debates the future of health care in the United States, several Ohio health advocates are pointing to the success of health management programs underway at workplaces throughout the state. A number of employers are achieving reduced costs and improved health outcomes for employees, through programs that emphasize wellness and disease management. "The example of what`s working at workplaces throughout Ohio and the nation needs to be taken into account by members of Congress as they debate health reform legislation," said Joe San Filippo, chief health care strategist for Nationwide Better Health. "Because of programs that emphasize wellness and prevention, large and small employers are seeing decreases in health care costs and absenteeism, and increases in overall employee health." The Ohio chapter of the Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease (PFCD) is urging members of Ohio`s Congressional delegation to learn from the experience of local employers. In the health reform debate, the PFCD advocates for provisions that address the impact of chronic disease. Chronic conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, obesity, asthma, cancer, hypertension and depression account for 75 percent of all health care spending nationally. In Ohio, it is estimated that more than half the population has a chronic illness. An example of a large Ohio-based employer with a robust, successful health and wellness program in place is Nationwide. "From the inception of our program, we've seen associates actively engaged in managing their health and significant improvement in workplace productivity. Our associates who participated in the first three years of the program are seeing results including a 38 percent increase in physical activity and a 17 percent reduction in tobacco use. Associates have also logged more than 6.5 billion steps in the last two years in the company`s walking program," said Kathleen Herath, associate vice president of Health and Productivity at Nationwide. Another Ohio employer, Alvis House, is a non-profit organization with more than 225 employees and operates community corrections programs in Columbus, Chillicothe, Dayton, Lima and Toledo. Last year, 100 percent of employees and participating spouses took part in health risk assessments. Alvis House also sponsored a number of wellness activities, including a weight reduction program. As a result, insurance premiums increased only a remarkable one percent for this year, compared to the double-digit increases the agency experienced in the years before the wellness program began. Recent research on the cost of treatment for chronic illnesses, many of which are preventable or manageable, give insight into why wellness programs are part of the culture in both large and small workplaces (from Fitness at Work web site): * U.S. healthcare costs doubled from 1990 to 2001 and are projected to double by 2012 Source: Partnerships for Prevention (an organization of CEO's dedicated to health promotion advocacy, www.prevent.org) * Four of the ten most costly health conditions affecting employers are related to heart disease and stroke. Employees with heart disease and heart disease risk factors cost employers thousands of dollars more than healthy employees each year through higher insurance. Source: Goetzel, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1998 * Between 1990 and 2004, the number of obese adults in Massachusetts rose 80 percent. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts found that with every 1 percent increase in body mass index, an individual's annual health care costs goes up $120. Source: Boston Globe, March 22, 2006 * "Of the $5000 per employee the average employer spent on health care in 2001, more than 95 percent was spent on diagnosis and treatment, with maybe 2-3 percent being invested in early detection (screenings) and no more than 1-2 percent in prevention. This reactive approach persists despite evidence that up to 50 percent of health care expenditures are life-style related and therefore potentially preventable." Source: David Anderson, PhD reporting in Wellness Councils of America's Absolute Advantage 2003 * Each smoker costs an employer an additional $3,856 a year in health-care costs and lost productivity. Source: Billings Gazette December 10, 2005 "Prevention and disease management are a critical part of the federal health reform legislation," said Kenneth Thorpe, Ph.D., national executive director for the PFCD and chair of the Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University. "By better managing chronic diseases, we avoid the need for costly procedures, such as amputations or surgeries that arise from untreated or mismanaged conditions. By preventing diseases, our system can avoid some costs altogether. This is what policymakers are hoping to do by investing in an infrastructure that includes prevention and disease management-to eliminate costs, not just shift them to another part of the system." Editor`s Note: For more information on the programs mentioned, please contact: Joe San Filippo, Chief Health Care Strategist, Nationwide Better Health, 614-249-2236 Kathleen Herath, Associate Vice President, Health and Productivity, Nationwide, 614-249-4058 Denise Robinson, CEO, Alvis House, 614-252-8402 For the Ohio chapter of the Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease Jenny Camper, 614-224-0658 or 614-579-7948 Copyright Business Wire 2009
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.



Follow Reuters