FACTBOX-Benchmark Asian iron ore prices since 1992
June 30 (Reuters) - Chinese steel mills and global miners have until the end of the day to agree annual iron ore term prices, a deadline that may prove flexible as the two sides struggle to reach a deal.
A failure to strike a deal would mean China having to buy most of its ore on the volatile spot market and signal a collapse of the decades-old benchmark pricing system.
Rio Tinto Ltd (RIO.AX) (RIO.L), the world's No.2 iron ore producer, has maintained it is ready to sell to its customers on whatever basis they prefer, but has shown no inclination to go lower than a 33 percent price cut it agreed with Japanese and South Korean customers.
China has fiercely resisted anything less than a 40 to 50 percent reduction in prices from 2008 levels, although its negotiating power has been undermined by a recent recovery in iron ore prices.
Following is a table of iron ore settlement prices for
Asian steelmakers based on data from Macquarie Group (MQG.AX)
investment bank. Prices are in U.S. cents per one percent iron
per dry tonne.
c/mtu c/mtu Pct change YoY
SSF Carajas SSF Carajas 1992 28.11 28.60 -4.9 -4.8 1993 25.02 25.51 -11.0 -10.8 1994 22.65 23.14 -9.5 -9.3 1995 23.96 24.45 5.8 5.7 1996 25.39 25.88 6.0 5.9 1997 25.67 26.16 1.1 1.1 1998 26.40 26.89 2.8 2.8 1999 23.49 23.98 -11.0 -10.8 2000 24.52 25.01 4.4 4.3 2001 25.57 26.06 4.3 4.2 2002 24.96 25.45 -2.4 -2.3 2003 27.20 27.70 9.0 8.8 2004 32.27 32.76 18.6 18.3 2005 55.34 56.18 71.5 71.5 2006 65.85 66.85 19.0 19.0 2007 72.11 73.20 9.5 9.5 2008 from Vale
118.98 125.17 65.0 71.0 2008 From Rio Tinto
Pilbara fines Pilbara lump Fines Lump
144.66 201.69 79.88 96.5 2009 From Vale (with Japan/Korea)
Southeastern Southeastern
System fines System lump
85 99 -28.2 -44.5 2009 From Rio Tinto (with Japan/Korea)
Pilbara fines Pilbara lump Fines Lump
97 112 -33 -44.5
Source: Vale, Rio Tinto, Macquarie Research (Compiled by Miyoung Kim; Editing by Michael Urquhart)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.



Follow Reuters