U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

SEC Stanford probe hurt by Stanford, Antigua

Texas billionaire Allen Stanford arrives at the Federal courthouse in Houston, in the custody of US marshalls, June 25, 2009. REUTERS/ Steve Campbell

Texas billionaire Allen Stanford arrives at the Federal courthouse in Houston, in the custody of US marshalls, June 25, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/ Steve Campbell

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:00pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's probe of Texas financier Allen Stanford was hampered by a lack of cooperation by Stanford and the head of Antigua's financial regulator, the SEC's internal watchdog said in a report released on Tuesday.

Responding to complaints that the SEC did not act quickly enough to shut down Stanford's alleged $7 billion fraud, the SEC watchdog found that the agency did not breach its obligations to vigorously pursue the case.

In February, the SEC charged Stanford and three of his companies with fraudulently selling billions of dollars in certificates of deposit with improbably high interest rates.

The charges came about two months after it was revealed that Bernard Madoff orchestrated a multibillion dollar Ponzi scheme in which earlier investors were paid with money from newer investors. The SEC has been chastised for missing Madoff's fraud.

Inspector General David Kotz, who has issued damning reports on the SEC, said the agency's investigation was also hurt by a lack of cooperation from Stanford's counsel, certain jurisdictional obstacles and several individuals at Antigua's Financial Services Regulatory Commission.

After April 2008, when SEC staff referred their concern that Stanford might be running a Ponzi scheme out of Antigua to the Department of Justice, the SEC "effectively halted its investigation" at the justice department's request, the report said.

But right after Madoff's Ponzi fraud was revealed in December 2008, the Stanford probe became more urgent for the SEC, the report said.

The SEC said: "As the DOJ prepared to proceed, the SEC ensured that its ongoing activities did not interfere with DOJ's criminal investigation of Stanford International Bank's CD offerings."

"In consultation with DOJ, the SEC continued to talk with witnesses and review documents and other evidence already in its possession," agency spokesman John Nester said in a statement.

Senator David Vitter, who made the request to the agency's inspector general, said it is clear that there was some sort of stand down order issued by the DOJ.

Vitter said the SEC did continue to investigate the Stanford group until it was told by the FBI that the SEC's probe might compromise the preliminary FBI investigation.

Kotz is due to release a report on how the agency mishandled the Madoff case in August.

(Reporting by Rachelle Younglai; Editing by Richard Chang)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.