Sun Belt Dominates First Half 2009 Foreclosure Rankings but Unemployment-Related...

Sun Belt Dominates First Half 2009 Foreclosure Rankings but
Unemployment-Related Foreclosures May Be Spreading
Las Vegas, Cape Coral-Fort Myers and Merced Post Top Metro Foreclosure Rates;
Cities in Oregon, Utah, Idaho, Arkansas Show Significant Growth

IRVINE, Calif., July 30 /PRNewswire/ -- RealtyTrac((R)) (www.realtytrac.com),
the leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, today released its
Midyear 2009 Metropolitan Foreclosure Market Report, which shows that cities
in California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona continued to document the nation's
highest foreclosure rates in the first half of 2009, with those states
accounting for 35 of the 50 highest foreclosure rates among metro areas with a
population of 200,000 or more.

While some of the most foreclosure-saturated metro areas in Michigan, Ohio,
Indiana and California posted declining foreclosure activity in the first six
months of 2009, other areas of the country not previously considered
foreclosure hot spots have seen increased levels of activity. More than 20
percent of the metro areas which showed above average levels of foreclosure
activity were in states such as Oregon, Idaho, Utah, Arkansas, Illinois and
South Carolina, suggesting that much of the new foreclosure activity may be
more directly related to growing unemployment than continuing fallout from
subprime and adjustable rate loans.

"Foreclosure activity continued its upward trajectory nationwide and in the
majority of metro areas in the first half of the year, but there are some
significant differences beginning to show up in the data," said James J.
Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. "While some of the markets
that had the highest saturation of foreclosures over the past few years have
seen declining rates, new markets like Provo, Utah, and Boise, Idaho, have
seen large increases. As unemployment rates increase in different parts of the
country, it's very likely that we'll see similar patterns develop elsewhere."

Top metro foreclosure rates
Las Vegas posted the nation's highest metro foreclosure rate, with 7.45
percent of its housing units (one in 13) receiving at least one foreclosure
filing in the first half of 2009 -- more than six times the national average.
A total of 58,691 Las Vegas properties received a foreclosure filing during
the first half of 2009, a 22 percent increase from the previous six months and
a 56 percent increase from the first half of 2009.

The Cape Coral-Fort Myers metro area in Florida documented the second highest
metro foreclosure rate in the first half of 2009, with 7.20 percent of its
housing units (one in every 14) receiving at least one foreclosure filing, and
Merced, Calif., documented the third highest metro foreclosure rate, with 6.89
percent of its housing units (one in 15) receiving at least one foreclosure
filing. Both Cape Coral-Fort Myers and Merced reported a slight decrease in
foreclosure activity from the previous six months but still reported
increasing foreclosure activity from the first half of 2008.

Other metro areas in the top 10 were the California cities of Riverside-San
Bernardino-Ontario (5.73 percent), Stockton (5.64 percent), Modesto (5.38
percent), Bakersfield (4.53 percent) and Vallejo-Fairfield (4.48 percent),
along with the Phoenix metro area (4.44 percent) and the Orlando, Fla., metro
area (4.28 percent). All seven of these metro areas except for Stockton and
Modesto reported increasing foreclosure activity from the previous six months
and from the first six months of 2008.

Declining foreclosure activity in some foreclosure hot spots
Foreclosure activity in Stockton decreased nearly 4 percent from the previous
six months and nearly 13 percent from the first half of 2008, and foreclosure
activity in Modesto decreased nearly 3 percent from the previous six months
and more than 9 percent from the first half of 2008.

With 1.86 percent of its housing units receiving a foreclosure filing in the
first half of 2009, Detroit's foreclosure rate continued to rank among the top
50 metro foreclosure rates, but foreclosure activity there decreased 8 percent
from the previous six months and 16 percent from the first half of 2008.
Detroit's foreclosure rate ranked highest in the nation in RealtyTrac's 2006
and 2007 reports.

Foreclosure activity in Cleveland, which posted the nation's sixth highest
foreclosure rate in 2007, decreased 11 percent from the previous six months
and 30 percent from the first half of 2008. With 1.36 percent of its housing
units (one in 73) receiving at least one foreclosure filing, Cleveland's
foreclosure rate was still above the national average but was not among the
top 50 metro foreclosure rates in the first half of 2009.

Other hard-hit Rust Belt cities posting year-over-year declines were
Indianapolis and the Ohio cities of Toledo and Columbus.

Report methodology
The RealtyTrac U.S. Foreclosure Market Report provides a count of the total
number of properties with at least one foreclosure filing reported during the
first six months of 2009. Data is also available at the individual county
level and MSA level for Midyear 2009, Q2 2009 and June 2009. Data is collected
from more than 2,200 counties nationwide, and those counties account for more
than 90 percent of the U.S. population. RealtyTrac's report incorporates
documents filed in all three phases of foreclosure: Default -- Notice of
Default (NOD) and Lis Pendens (LIS); Auction -- Notice of Trustee Sale and
Notice of Foreclosure Sale (NTS and NFS); and Real Estate Owned, or REO
properties (that have been foreclosed on and repurchased by a bank). If more
than one foreclosure document is filed against a property during the month or
quarter, only the most recent filing is counted in the report.

U.S. Metro Foreclosure Market Data - Jan to Jun 2009

U.S. Metro Foreclosure Market Data - Jan to Jun 2009

Properties % Change % Change
Rate with FC % Housing 1/every from Jul- from Jan-
Rank Metro Name Filings Units X HU Dec 08 Jun 08
-- U.S. Total 1,528,364 1.19 84 9.46 14.66

1 Las Vegas-Paradise,
NV Total 58,691 7.45 13 22.20 56.22
2 Cape Coral-Fort
Myers, FL Total 25,926 7.20 14 -2.66 26.06
3 Merced, CA Total 5,725 6.89 15 -2.00 14.73
4 Riverside-San
Bernardino-
Ontario, CA Total 82,339 5.73 17 11.41 11.75
5 Stockton, CA Total 12,787 5.64 18 -3.96 -12.79
6 Modesto, CA Total 9,344 5.38 19 -2.75 -9.21
7 Bakersfield,
CA Total 12,176 4.53 22 10.62 17.34
8 Vallejo-
Fairfield, CA Total 6,706 4.48 22 3.92 6.63
9 Phoenix-Mesa-
Scottsdale, AZ
Total 74,053 4.44 22 10.96 51.71
10 Orlando-Kissimmee,
FL Total 37,801 4.28 23 15.32 76.23
11 Port St. Lucie,
FL Total 8,249 4.00 25 1.76 27.50
12 Naples-Marco
Island, FL Total 6,990 3.64 27 12.22 56.90
13 Reno-Sparks,
NV Total 6,515 3.63 28 31.86 88.73
14 Miami-Fort
Lauderdale-
Pompano Beach,
FL Total 85,399 3.54 28 11.35 40.87
15 Sacramento--
Arden-Arcade--
Roseville,
CA Total 29,324 3.46 29 8.58 1.51
16 Salinas, CA
Total 4,339 3.11 32 -8.52 -0.94
17 Fresno, CA Total 9,375 3.08 32 14.74 17.13
18 Visalia-
Porterville,
CA Total 3,948 2.91 34 25.97 50.63
19 Deltona-Daytona
Beach-Ormond
Beach, FL Total 6,635 2.69 37 15.92 46.82
20 San Diego-
Carlsbad-
San Marcos,
CA Total 30,297 2.67 37 6.91 -0.05
21 Lakeland,
FL Total 7,407 2.67 37 3.36 47.52
22 Sarasota-
Bradenton-
Venice, FL Total 10,364 2.66 38 -4.20 18.11
23 Tampa-St.
Petersburg-
Clearwater, FL
Total 33,906 2.58 39 -2.98 31.50
24 Ocala, FL Total 4,086 2.57 39 22.34 79.53
25 Oxnard-Thousand
Oaks-Ventura,
CA Total 6,762 2.48 40 15.45 18.67
26 Los Angeles-Long
Beach-Santa Ana,
CA Total 106,105 2.41 42 27.07 29.95
27 Prescott, AZ Total 2,518 2.41 42 48.20 91.34
28 Palm Bay-Melbourne
- Titusville,
FL Total 6,316 2.38 42 -2.52 20.05
29 Greeley, CO Total 2,156 2.33 43 14.01 -11.53
30 Jacksonville,
FL Total 13,556 2.32 43 25.16 59.44
31 Provo-Orem,
UT Total 3,168 2.24 45 62.88 128.57
32 Boise City-
Nampa, ID Total 5,214 2.21 45 46.50 121.21*
33 Santa Rosa-
Petaluma,
CA Total 4,164 2.11 47 4.83 21.51
34 Fayetteville
-Springdale-
Rogers, AR-MO
Total 3,838 2.09 48 19.53 65.50
35 Atlanta-Sandy
Springs-Marietta,
GA Total 42,799 2.02 49 10.93 11.47
36 San Francisco-
Oakland-Fremont,
CA Total 32,439 1.92 52 7.69 8.74
37 San Jose-
Sunnyvale-Santa
Clara, CA Total 11,924 1.89 53 10.51 17.56
38 Detroit-Warren-
Livonia, MI
Total 35,352 1.86 54 -8.23 -16.37
39 Chicago-
Naperville-
Joliet, IL-
IN-WI Total 63,573 1.69 59 21.60 30.31
40 Tucson, AZ Total 7,107 1.67 60 17.70 61.96
41 Santa Cruz-
Watsonville,
CA Total 1,693 1.65 61 15.09 20.58
42 Santa Barbara-
Santa Maria-
Goleta, CA Total 2,483 1.64 61 5.66 11.00
43 Memphis, TN-
MS-AR Total 8,598 1.57 64 0.29 -16.06++
44 Flint, MI Total 3,028 1.53 65 -7.60 -17.04
45 Denver-Aurora,
CO Total 15,630 1.50 67 -7.90 -29.43
46 Indianapolis-
Carmel, IN Total 11,037 1.48 68 0.44 -11.98
47 San Luis Obispo-
Paso Robles,
CA Total 1,706 1.47 68 29.54 60.79
48 Columbus,
OH Total 11,231 1.45 69 1.44 -5.69
49 Colorado
Springs, CO Total 3,690 1.44 69 5.19 8.27
50 Lansing-
East Lansing,
MI Total 2,822 1.44 70 23.45 17.63
51 Toledo, OH Total 4,298 1.43 70 -1.94 -10.85
52 Pensacola-Ferry
Pass-Brent,
FL Total 2,793 1.42 71 9.19 23.09
53 Rockford,
IL Total 2,029 1.41 71 24.94 15.09
54 Canton-Massillon,
OH Total 2,443 1.38 73 -2.71 -17.05
55 Washington-
Arlington-
Alexandria,
DC-VA-MD-WV
Total 29,211 1.37 73 -7.52+ -9.56+
56 Cleveland-
Elyria-Mentor,
OH Total 12,862 1.36 73 -11.45 -30.34
57 Chico, CA Total 1,289 1.36 74 14.99 47.48
58 Salt Lake City,
UT Total 5,322 1.36 74 22.71 63.15
59 Ogden-
Clearfield,
UT Total 2,397 1.35 74 49.91 82.00
60 Portland-
Vancouver-
Beaverton, OR-
WA Total 11,647 1.31 76 64.53 112.73
61 Grand Rapids-
Wyoming, MI Total 4,178 1.31 76 2.05 13.72
62 Charleston-North
Charleston, SC
Total 3,629 1.29 78 25.83 364.66*
63 Dayton, OH Total 4,717 1.24 81 1.27 -19.55
64 Salem, OR Total 1,724 1.18 85 69.02 101.64
65 Macon, GA Total 1,138 1.11 90 14.60 5.37
66 Minneapolis-St.
Paul-Bloomington,
MN-WI Total 14,629 1.11 90 39.43 58.63
67 Holland-Grand
Haven, MI Total 1,068 1.06 94 35.02 36.40
68 Gainesville,
FL Total 1,220 1.06 94 41.53 91.82
69 Akron, OH Total 3,222 1.05 96 -30.12 -39.34
70 Milwaukee-
Waukesha-West
Allis, WI Total 6,789 1.04 97 27.52 1.88
71 Green Bay, WI Total 1,380 1.03 97 117.67 146.87*
72 Ann Arbor, MI Total 1,440 0.98 102 -4.89 -15.34
73 Cincinnati-
Middletown,
OH-KY-IN Total 8,827 0.97 103 -5.73 -11.52
74 Greenville-
Mauldin-Easley,
SC Total 2,594 0.97 104 22.82 138.64*
75 Fort Wayne, IN
Total 1,681 0.95 106 -12.31 -14.19
76 Seattle-Tacoma
-Bellevue, WA
Total 13,179 0.94 107 25.73 71.96
77 Saginaw-Saginaw
Township North,
MI Total 823 0.93 108 -7.01 -26.52
78 Fort Collins-
Loveland, CO Total 1,179 0.93 108 2.61 -13.05
79 Youngstown-Warren
-Boardman, OH-PA
Total 2,406 0.92 109 -0.62 -14.80
80 Kalamazoo-
Portage, MI Total 1,308 0.90 111 -3.04 3.56
81 Atlantic City,
NJ Total 1,131 0.89 112 -20.96 14.47
82 Worcester, MA Total 2,828 0.89 112 -1.87 -38.06
83 Savannah, GA Total 1,282 0.89 112 34.10 18.59
84 Tallahassee,
FL Total 1,391 0.88 114 24.09 61.93
85 Myrtle Beach-
Conway-North
Myrtle Beach,
SC Total 1,420 0.84 118 255.89* 342.37*
86 Kansas City,
MO-KS Total 7,087 0.82 122 -4.35+ -8.27+
87 South Bend-
Mishawaka, IN-MI
Total 1,126 0.81 124 -4.33 -10.49
88 Olympia, WA Total 809 0.81 124 5.20 66.80
89 Manchester-
Nashua, NH Total 1,297 0.80 125 1.89 16.53
90 Eugene-
Springfield,
OR Total 1,188 0.80 126 55.09 100.34
91 St. Louis, MO-
IL Total 9,713 0.79 127 -18.45+ -21.16+
92 Virginia Beach-
Norfolk-Newport
News, VA-NC Total 5,284 0.78 129 10.18+ 127.56+
93 Chattanooga, TN-
GA Total 1,759 0.77 130 11.75 -6.93++
94 Little Rock-
North Little
Rock-Conway,
AR Total 2,264 0.77 130 -5.71 7.25
95 Birmingham-
Hoover, AL Total 3,814 0.76 131 217.04* 271.37*
96 Dallas-Fort Worth
-Arlington, TX
Total 18,037 0.76 131 6.63 -16.52
97 New Haven-Milford,
CT Total 2,585 0.74 135 -16.02 -30.77
98 Mobile, AL Total 1,313 0.73 136 75.30* 28.22*
99 York-Hanover, PA
Total 1,272 0.73 137 16.91 57.04
100 Tulsa,
OK Total 2,835 0.71 140 6.34 0.39
101 Brownsville-
Harlingen, TX
Total 1,021 0.71 141 14.46 21.69
102 Providence-New
Bedford-Fall
River, RI-MA
Total 4,769 0.71 142 -2.33 -19.98
103 Richmond, VA Total 3,549 0.70 144 21.21 33.02
104 Boston-Cambridge
-Quincy, MA-NH
Total 12,614 0.69 144 4.53 -40.69
105 San Antonio,
TX Total 5,185 0.68 146 24.58 20.00
106 Trenton-Ewing,
NJ Total 956 0.68 147 -37.60 -17.80
107 Reading, PA Total 1,071 0.67 150 -11.05 81.22
108 Bridgeport-
Stamford-
Norwalk, CT
Total 2,322 0.66 151 -19.57 -29.64
109 Houston-Sugar
Land-Baytown,
TX Total 14,213 0.65 153 3.52 -31.32
110 Nashville-
Davidson--
Murfreesboro
--Franklin, TN
Total 4,183 0.65 153 -4.93 -24.93++
111 Augusta-Richmond
County, GA-SC
Total 1,459 0.64 155 21.08 3.84
112 Charlotte-
Gastonia-Concord,
NC-SC Total 4,499 0.63 158 -11.70 -23.91
113 Springfield,
MO Total 1,129 0.62 163 -11.66+ 52.16+
114 Montgomery, AL
Total 961 0.61 163 94.53* 167.69*
115 Boulder, CO Total 754 0.61 164 8.96 -2.58
116 Davenport-Moline
-Rock Island, IA-
IL Total 1,004 0.61 164 36.97 39.64
117 Killeen-Temple-
Fort Hood, TX
Total 882 0.61 165 28.01 40.00
118 Des Moines-West
Des Moines, IA
Total 1,414 0.60 167 11.34 48.53
119 New Orleans-
Metairie-Kenner,
LA Total 2,646 0.60 167 10.94 18.23
120 Columbia, SC
Total 1,860 0.60 167 22.29 31.63
121 Philadelphia-
Camden-Wilmington,
PA-NJ-DE-MD
Total 14,219 0.60 168 -7.89 -5.95
122 Madison, WI Total 1,464 0.59 169 138.44* 69.05*

123 Greensboro-
High Point,
NC Total 1,834 0.59 170 -22.97 -13.98
124 Springfield,
MA Total 1,653 0.58 171 17.40 -50.52
125 Austin-
Round Rock,
TX Total 3,689 0.58 173 19.19 26.68
126 Allentown-
Bethlehem-
Easton, PA-
NJ Total 1,888 0.57 176 34.47* 68.57*
127 Bremerton-
Silverdale,
WA Total 567 0.56 178 -11.82 5.00
128 Poughkeepsie-
Newburgh-
Middletown, NY
Total 1,354 0.55 182 -19.12 -3.01
129 Winston-Salem,
NC Total 1,123 0.54 184 -21.85 -19.90
130 Columbus, GA-
AL Total 686 0.54 187 17.47 3.47
131 Louisville/
Jefferson County,
KY-IN Total 2,922 0.53 187 3.43 50.93
132 Hagerstown-
Martinsburg,
MD-WV Total 598 0.53 189 18.89 33.18
133 Roanoke, VA
Total 738 0.53 189 294.65* 515.00*
134 Pittsburgh,
PA Total 5,830 0.53 190 -8.68 14.49
135 Anchorage, AK
Total 728 0.52 192 -17.08 3.70
136 Knoxville, TN
Total 1,604 0.52 193 -6.09 -21.26++
137 Hartford-
West Hartford-
East Hartford,
CT Total 2,518 0.51 195 -13.68 -33.53
138 Albuquerque,
NM Total 1,781 0.50 198 37.74* -0.28
139 Fort Smith,
AR-OK Total 614 0.50 201 18.99 6.41
140 Norwich-
New London,
CT Total 574 0.49 203 -24.17 -30.51
141 Huntsville, AL
Total 819 0.49 204 85.71* 136.02*
142 Appleton, WI
Total 442 0.49 205 114.56* 29.62*
143 Honolulu, HI
Total 1,616 0.48 207 30.53 275.81
144 Amarillo, TX
Total 467 0.48 210 9.37 5.66
145 Raleigh-Cary, NC
Total 2,024 0.48 210 -4.44 -24.70
146 Wichita, KS
Total 1,226 0.47 211 18.23 39.48
147 New York-
Northern New
Jersey-Long
Island, NY-NJ
-PA Total 34,889 0.47 211 -7.34 -23.46
148 Baltimore-
Towson, MD
Total 5,224 0.47 212 -11.08 -22.48
149 Barnstable
Town, MA
Total 727 0.47 214 18.02 -55.99
150 Clarksville,
TN-KY Total 498 0.46 218 -1.97 -10.75++
151 Waco, TX
Total 404 0.44 227 3.32 -9.62
152 Lancaster,
PA Total 796 0.41 244 1.14 90.89*
153 Peoria, IL
Total 667 0.41 244 -11.77 -22.44
154 El Paso, TX
Total 1,036 0.41 244 37.77 42.11
155 Laredo, TX
Total 281 0.41 246 2.93 103.62
156 Jackson, MS
Total 865 0.39 254 157.44* 85.22*
157 Springfield,
IL Total 373 0.39 258 -16.37 -29.49
158 Baton Rouge,
LA Total 1,237 0.39 259 189.70* 67.39*
159 Topeka, KS
Total 392 0.38 263 20.62 29.80
160 Rochester,
NY Total 1,601 0.36 276 -12.23 -28.04
161 Corpus
Christi, TX
Total 636 0.36 277 -0.93 -7.69
162 Durham, NC
Total 740 0.35 288 -20.43 -44.86
163 Erie, PA
Total 407 0.35 290 29.62 41.32*
164 Oklahoma
City, OK
Total 1,707 0.33 305 -34.65 -47.22
165 Buffalo-
Niagara Falls,
NY Total 1,663 0.32 313 -30.21 2.28*
166 Yakima, WA
Total 261 0.32 317 50.87 -21.86
167 Cedar Rapids,
IA Total 347 0.31 320 -2.80 -10.80
168 Shreveport-
Bossier City,
LA Total 501 0.29 344 68.69 53.21
169 Scranton--
Wilkes-Barre,
PA Total 699 0.27 369 -10.50 -30.65
170 Champaign-
Urbana, IL
Total 255 0.26 382 32.81 -10.84
171 Sioux Falls,
SD Total 235 0.26 389 19.90 66.67
172 Evansville,
IN-KY Total 409 0.26 390 -37.94 -42.64
173 Portland-
South Portland-
Biddeford,
ME Total 644 0.25 395 -11.29 -9.93
174 Harrisburg-
Carlisle,
PA Total 573 0.25 402 93.58* -10.47
175 Spartanburg,
SC Total 298 0.25 405 -46.98 -44.09
176 Binghamton,
NY Total 268 0.24 413 -4.63 31.37
177 Longview, TX
Total 197 0.23 430 95.05 155.84
178 Duluth, MN-
WI Total 311 0.23 440 -30.43 -28.01
179 Omaha-
Council
Bluffs, NE-
IA Total 760 0.22 461 -35.65 -52.71
180 Beaumont-
Port Arthur,
TX Total 345 0.21 467 -0.58 -27.06
181 Gulfport-
Biloxi, MS Total 209 0.19 513 386.05* 1206.25*
182 Lexington-
Fayette, KY
Total 393 0.19 516 -40.45 -2.24
183 McAllen-
Edinburg-
Mission, TX
Total 470 0.19 526 -46.83 -57.89
184 Kingsport-
Bristol-
Bristol, TN-
VA Total 263 0.18 553 24.06 -7.72++
185 Lynchburg, VA
Total 192 0.18 562 448.57* 255.56*
186 Huntington-
Ashland, WV-
KY-OH Total 229 0.17 578 36.31 55.78
187 Spokane,
WA Total 332 0.17 587 -41.45 -60.00
188 Albany-
Schenectady-
Troy, NY
Total 591 0.16 642 -27.75 -66.53
189 Wilmington, NC
Total 304 0.16 644 -49.33 -57.78
190 Lubbock, TX
Total 183 0.16 644 -44.38 131.65
191 Lafayette, LA
Total 168 0.15 659 54.13* -9.19
192 Hickory-
Lenoir-
Morganton,
NC Total 218 0.14 722 -47.34 -63.61
193 Fayetteville,
NC Total 195 0.13 774 -62.43 -73.61
194 Syracuse,
NY Total 265 0.09 1,078 -31.88 -61.59
195 College
Station-
Bryan, TX
Total 78 0.09 1,112 -7.14 5.41
196 Houma-
Bayou Cane
-Thibodaux,
LA Total 73 0.09 1,119 204.17* 170.37*
197 Asheville,
NC Total 174 0.09 1,147 -47.90 -66.28
198 Charleston,
WV Total 112 0.08 1,298 107.41 4.67
199 Kennewick-
Richland-Pasco,
WA Total 65 0.08 1,317 -65.24 -87.33
200 Tuscaloosa,
AL Total 72 0.08 1,318 12.50* 148.28*
201 Lincoln,
NE Total 34 0.03 3,625 -83.73 -93.72
202 Utica-Rome,
NY Total 25 0.02 5,441 -45.65 -74.23
203 Burlington
-South Burlington,
VT Total 11 0.01 8,066 -52.17 -42.11

*Actual increase may not be as high due to data collection changes or
improvements
+ Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this MSA was
discontinued starting in January 2009
++ Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this MSA was
discontinued starting in September 2008

About RealtyTrac Inc.
RealtyTrac (www.realtytrac.com) is the leading online marketplace of
foreclosure properties, with more than 1.5 million default, auction and
bank-owned listings from over 2,200 U.S. counties, along with detailed
property, loan and home sales data. Hosting more than 3 million unique monthly
visitors, RealtyTrac provides innovative technology solutions and practical
education resources to facilitate buying, selling and investing in real
estate. RealtyTrac's foreclosure data has also been used by the Federal
Reserve, FBI, U.S. Senate Joint Economic Committee and Banking Committee, U.S.
Treasury Department, and numerous state housing and banking departments to
help evaluate foreclosure trends and address policy issues related to
foreclosures.

SOURCE RealtyTrac

Michelle Sabolich of Atomic Public Relations, +1-415-402-0230
michelle.sabolich@atomicpr.com, for RealtyTrac