FACTBOX-Eight Japan power firms fall short of CO2 targets
(For related stories click [ID:nT74035] [ID:nT12835])
Aug 12 (Reuters) - Eight of Japan's 10 power firms failed to meet their self-imposed CO2 emission-cut targets last year, paving the way for the sector to buy more carbon rights from abroad in a bid to improve its "green" credentials.
Power companies may offset part of their CO2 emissions with carbon credits they buy either from abroad under the Kyoto Protocol's market mechanisms or from other Japanese companies via newly established domestic trading schemes.
All but Kyushu Electric Power Co (9508.T) and Shikoku Electric Power Co (9507.T) failed to meet their own targets in the first year of the Kyoto period mainly due to lower than planned utilisation of carbon-free nuclear power plants.
Japan, the world's fifth-biggest emitter, aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 6 percent below 1990 levels over 2008-2012, the period covered by Kyoto.
Power companies have voluntarily set a carbon intensity goal, which allows for higher emissions if efficiency improves. Each power firm is to emit 20 percent less CO2 per kilowatt hour than the 1990 levels. Those targets, although not legally binding, have become a core part of the government commitment under Kyoto.
TEPCO, for example, produced 4.6 percent less CO2 emissions in the year to March 2009 than a year earlier as its electricity sales fell 2.8 percent to 289 billion kilowatt hours.
In addition, it offset 20 percent of the emissions with 24.8 million tonnes of Kyoto-backed carbon credits it bought from abroad. Given adjusted emissions of 95.9 million tonnes, TEPCO produced 0.332 kg of CO2 per kilowatt hour last year.
But it still fell short of its goal for the five years to March 2013 of 0.304 kg.
TEPCO is set to restart its Kashiwazaki Kariwa nuclear plant, the world's biggest, after a halt of more than two years.
But it is not yet known when all seven of the plant's reactors will resume running and contribute to TEPCO's goal of lowering its annual CO2 intensity rate by about 0.07 kg of CO2 per kilowatt hour.
Earlier this year Japan launched a domestic carbon trading scheme, in which big companies with self-imposed goals invest in energy saving projects in smaller companies, and in exchange receive carbon credits to offset their emissions.
But such credits are small and their cost is relatively high.
Analysts say it would be premature for the sector to use another government scheme, being floated on a trial basis, which enables over-the-counter trade of carbon rights among big companies.
Below are details of carbon intensity rates, based on CO2 emissions partly offset by carbon credits, provided by the 10 power companies, with the worst performer at the top (CO2 emissions in millions of tonnes, 2008/2009 electricity sales in billions of kilowatt hours and CO2 intensity rate in kg per kilowatt hour);
07/08 08/09 08/09 target
CO2 emissions elec sales per-unit CO2
in mln tonnes in bln kwh in kg/kwh Hokuriku actual 18.51 15.47 28.2 (9505.T) adjusted 13.60 0.483 0.32 Hokkaido actual 16.78 18.72 31.8 (9509.T) adjusted 18.72* 0.588 0.42 Okinawa actual 7.0 7.1 7.5 (9511.T) adjusted 7.1* 0.946 0.69 Chubu actual 64.67 59.05 129.7 (9502.T) adjusted 55.06 0.424 0.371 Tokyo actual 126.5 120.7 289.0 (9501.T) adjusted 95.9 0.332 0.304 Kansai actual 54.99 51.73 145.9 (9503.T) adjusted 43.60 0.299 0.282 Tohoku actual 39.79 38.02 81.1 (9506.T) adjusted 27.60 0.340 0.322 Chugoku actual 43.07 41.29 61.2 (9504.T) adjusted 30.68 0.501 0.491 Shikoku actual 11.46 10.85 28.7 (9507.T) adjusted 9.37 0.326 0.326 Kyushu actual 34.1 32.1 85.9 (9508.T) adjusted 29.9 0.348 0.348 TOTAL actual 416.87 395.03 CO2 adjusted 331.53** *Hokkaido and Okinawa did not redeem any carbon credits to calculate their carbon intensity ratios for 2008/2009. **Companies declined to comment on whether the value each accounted as CO2 credit costs in its earnings report for fiscal 2008/2009 represents the volume of carbon credits it redeemed this time. (Reporting by Risa Maeda; Editing by Michael Watson)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.


Follow Reuters