U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

U.S. court reinstates Boeing sex discrimination case

Related Topics

LOS ANGELES | Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:14pm EDT

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Two female engineers who sued Boeing Co for gender discrimination had their lawsuit reinstated by an appeals court that ruled on Tuesday that they had adequate evidence to bring the case to trial.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission brought the appeal on behalf of Antonia Castron and Renee Wrede, who contend that they were fired after complaining of sexual harassment in separate male-dominated work environments.

Castron also brought a retaliation claim against the aerospace company, which won the case at the trial court level on summary judgment.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled reversed the trial court ruling and remanded the case for trial, concluding that a jury could find that Boeing had manipulated the women's performance evaluations in order to terminate them.

The decision was rendered earlier this year but was published on Friday, both sides said.

EEOC Assistant General Counsel Carolyn Wheeler said the decision raises important legal points, including the idea that "stray remarks" of a demeaning nature could be proof of discrimination, and that an employee could be subject to bias even when fired by the same person who hired her.

A Boeing spokesman said the company was confident in its case was strong and would let a jury decide its merits.

The appeals court found that "demeaning and derogatory comments" made by Castron's supervisor about women in general, along with his interactions with her, could provide enough evidence to convince a jury of "discriminatory motive" even if the comments weren't directed at her, the opinion said.

In Wrede's case, Boeing substantiated her sexual harassment claim but a year later, her manager gave her lower scores on a performance evaluation than others in her section, the opinion said.

She was subsequently fired even after several other managers requested that she be transferred to their departments, a fact that could lead a jury to find that the low performance score was "not credible," the appeals court said.

The case is Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Boeing Company, Case No. 07-16903, Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

(Reporting by Gina Keating; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.