Editor's Choice

Debate recap: Bird Flu Research

Two pathologists dissect a swan in the Danish Food Research Center in Aarhus, Jutland, February 16, 2006. Europe began locking up its one-billion-strong chicken flock on Wednesday after the deadly bird flu virus was found in two more countries on the continent, dealing another blow to battered poultry producers. Germany and Austria are the latest EU countries to report the discovery of dead swans infected with the H5N1 strain of avian influenza, which has spread from Asia to Africa, killed 91 people and led to the destruction of millions of birds. NORWAY OUT DENMARK OUT SWEDEN OUT NO THIRD PARTY SALES REUTERS/Henning Bagger/Scanpix

Dangerous information on a deadly virus

A call to censor scientific research on the deadly bird flu virus has global health officials debating whether such studies are worth the risk. Read our recap of a Harvard School of Public Health discussion on this subject, presented in collaboration with Reuters.  Learn More 

Muscle mass, not fat, makes for stronger bones

A man looks at an x-ray in this undated handout photo. REUTERS/Newscom/handout

A man looks at an x-ray in this undated handout photo.

Credit: Reuters/Newscom/handout

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:38pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - New findings call into question the idea that being overweight or obese might protect people from developing brittle bones.

Dr. Jean-Marc Kaufman of Ghent University Hospital in Belgium and his colleagues found that fattier men had smaller, thinner bones, while those with more lean mass had larger, denser skeletons.

High body mass index (BMI) has been thought to protect both men and women against the bone-thinning disease osteoporosis, while being thin boosts a person's likelihood of fractures due to this condition. The idea behind the theory is that extra weight stresses the bone, stimulating the formation of new bone tissue.

But new evidence suggests that fat mass might affect bones differently than muscle mass does, Kaufman and his team note in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.

To investigate the issue further, the researchers looked at bone density and volume, as well as lean and fat mass, in 768 men aged 25 to 45, including 296 pairs of brothers.

After the researchers adjusted for weight, they found that men's bone mass and volume fell steadily as their percentage of fat mass increased, while bone size rose in tandem with lean mass. Fat in the trunk area had a stronger influence on bone size than fat on the arms and legs.

"Lean mass," the researchers conclude, "is the major determinant of bone size, providing further evidence that bone size is adapted to the dynamic load imposed by muscle force rather than passive loading" by fat.

SOURCE: Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, July 2009.

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.