U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Why Americans disagree about healthcare reform

WASHINGTON | Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:27pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Using arguments about the social benefits of healthcare reform may galvanize Democrats but they leave Republicans cold, U.S. researchers reported on Thursday.

Politicians seeking support for new regulations and laws aimed at improving health may need to carefully frame their arguments for each audience, the researchers reported in the American Journal of Public Health.

They set up an experiment that showed Republicans and Democrats alike supported measures to reduce the risk of type-2 diabetes.

But the Republicans lost enthusiasm when the researchers presented arguments about how hard it is for people to exercise and eat right when streets have no sidewalks and fast-food restaurants abound, Sarah Gollust of the University of Pennsylvania and colleagues found.

"If you are more liberally minded the 'neighborhood explanation' can be motivating, but for people who are more conservative politically, that message can backfire and make them even less interested," said the University of Michigan's Dr. Peter Ubel, who worked on the study.

"The same information can polarize people."

Gollust, Ubel and colleagues designed an Internet study and asked more than 2,400 people a series of questions based on diabetes -- an example of a public health problem that may need both political and medical solutions.

People describing themselves as Republican or conservative were far more likely to disagree with arguments that social determinants -- such as the availability of junk food -- were responsible for the epidemic of diabetes.

They found that 32 percent of Democrats agreed that social factors affected health, compared to 16 percent of Republicans. Both groups agreed equally with the role of genetics in diabetes.

"When people are given the same information they can come away with very different opinions," Gollust said in a statement.

"Americans' opinions about health policy are polarized on political partisan lines, with recent survey evidence demonstrating that Republicans and Democrats seemingly disagree on nearly every aspect of health care and approaches to reform," the researchers wrote.

"Our experimental findings contribute to this evidence, showing that Democrats and Republicans also differ in the ways in which they receive and react to messages about the social determinants of health."

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.