U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

FACTBOX: White House lays out Copenhagen emissions proposal

Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:09pm EST

(Reuters) - The White House laid out the U.S. negotiating position on Wednesday for U.N. climate change talks in Copenhagen, pledging to cut emissions roughly 17 percent by 2020 compared to 2005 levels, in line with legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives.

President Barack Obama will attend the Copenhagen talks on December 9, officials said.

Below are the proposed figures and other elements of the U.S. proposals:

EMISSIONS CUTS

The United States will pledge to make the following cuts in its greenhouse gas emissions compared to a 2005 base year:

-- an emissions reduction target "in the range of 17 percent" by 2020

-- a 30 percent emissions reduction in 2025

-- a 42 percent emissions reduction in 2030

Compared to 1990, the base year used by the European Union and many other developed countries, the figures correspond to:

-- a 3 percent reduction in 2020

-- an 18 percent reduction in 2025

-- a 32 percent reduction in 2030

IN LINE WITH CONGRESS

The Obama administration's hands have been tied in international negotiations because a domestic climate bill has not yet become law. The House of Representatives has passed its version, but a Senate bill is still languishing.

The House passed a bill that sets a 17 percent reduction target for emissions by 2020 from 2005 levels. A Senate version is shooting for a 20 percent cut.

The White House said its 2020 targets would be flexible based on the outcome of final legislation, but it chose the less ambitious 17 percent figure passed by the House to ensure its negotiating position would have lawmaker support.

White House officials conferred with lawmakers before laying out the U.S. plans.

CALLING ON CHINA, OTHER COUNTRIES

White House officials said the U.S. proposal would come "in the context of an overall deal in Copenhagen that includes robust mitigation contributions from China and the other emerging economies."

But the U.S. proposals are far lower than what the 27-nation European Union has called for. The EU is pledging a 20 percent emissions cut by 2020 compared to 1990 levels and has promised to change that to 30 percent if other rich nations follow suit.

U.S. PLAYERS IN COPENHAGEN

Obama will go to the Denmark talks on December 9, right at the beginning of the two-week negotiating period.

Other players slated to attend during the course of the talks include:

-- Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson

-- Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar

-- Commerce Secretary Gary Locke

-- Energy Secretary Steven Chu

-- Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack

-- Assistant to the President Carol Browner and Council on Environmental Quality Chair Nancy Sutley

- Climate negotiator Todd Stern and deputy national security adviser Michael Froman

(Reporting by Jeff Mason in Washington; Editing by Will Dunham)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.