Sponsored Links

Recession puts U.S. halfway to emissions goal

Related Topics

A car drives past the Helanshan Wind Power Plant in Wuzhong, Ningxia province, September 23, 2009.REUTERS/Stringer

A car drives past the Helanshan Wind Power Plant in Wuzhong, Ningxia province, September 23, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Stringer

WASHINGTON | Tue Dec 8, 2009 6:06pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The recession has slashed U.S. output of planet warming gases and puts the country on track to reach President Barack Obama's short-term emissions goal, but cutting the pollution further will take more effort as the economy recovers.

"Losing weight by starving is different than shedding pounds through exercise," said Kevin Book, an analyst at ClearView Energy Partners, LLC.

He said as the economy recovers electricity demand should rise, pushing up emissions from that sector. That will require the world's second largest emitter of greenhouse gases after China to move faster to low-carbon sources like renewable energy if Obama's short-term goal is to be met, he said.

Obama is expected to pledge next week at a U.N. climate meeting in Copenhagen that the United States will cut output of gases blamed for warming the planet, including carbon dioxide, roughly 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020.

On Tuesday the Energy Information Administration said in a monthly outlook that U.S. carbon dioxide output in 2009 will fall about 6.1 percent to 5.45 billion tonnes as the recession cuts demand for coal used to generate electricity.

That was about 8.9 percent below the 2005 level of 5.98 billion tonnes, putting the U.S. on track, at least for now, to reach Obama's goal. Carbon dioxide emissions represent about 80 percent of overall U.S. greenhouse gas output.

A small increase in emissions could begin to show as early as next year, however. In 2010, the EIA said, U.S. carbon emissions are expected to rise 1.5 percent to 5.53 billion tonnes as the economy recovers.

Coal consumption by U.S. electricity generators fell nearly 12 percent for the first nine months of 2009, as the recession cut power demand. But emissions also were reduced by greater generation from lower-emission sources such as natural gas, hydropower and wind power, the EIA said.

Analysts said the United States need to speed up its moves toward a low-carbon economy.

"We have a drop in emissions as a result of the recession, but that does not mean that future cuts will come easily," said Tim Cheung, an analyst at New Energy Finance in New York.

"Those will have to come from somewhere, such as the electricity or industrial sectors."

U.S. emissions jumped steadily from 1990 to just before the recession. In May the EIA said U.S. energy-related carbon dioxide output had jumped nearly 16 percent from 1990 to 2008.

(Reporting by Timothy Gardner; Editing by David Gregorio)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Thebes wrote:
Why is it we never hear about the Carbon Footprint of our Mideast Wars?

Perhaps if Obama stopped his mad mad spending sprees to, allegedly, revitalize the economy- AND if we ended the wars, then we wouldn’t need this scammy Cap and Trade Carbon Derivative system they are trying to set up. Wall Street NEVER did anything good for the enviroment, why should we expect this to work, it is being promulgated in part by the lady who introduced Credit Default Swaps that led to our current mess.

With lower governmental expenditures we could even cut taxes so that the average American pays less than 10 TIMES the amount of taxation that the colonists rebelled against. Wouldn’t that help consumer confidence?

But probably we’ll have Obama, Bernanke, et al build another bubble to wreck our economy again in a few years while relinquishing national sovereignty partially to a Global Government, which both the EU President(!) and the Copenhagen draft treaty call for.

Dec 09, 2009 2:37pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.