Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
The SpaceX mission
A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station. Slideshow
EU urges Israel to share Jerusalem
Related Video
BRUSSELS |
BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Union on Tuesday urged Israel to share Jerusalem with the Palestinians as part of a Middle East peace agreement and make the holy city the capital of two states.
Reaffirming a position which the current Israeli government rejects, EU foreign ministers said genuine peace needs the resolution of the status of Jerusalem through negotiation.
Rejecting Israel's annexation of the eastern half of the city, their statement said the EU would "not recognize any changes to the pre-1967 borders including with regard to Jerusalem, other than those agreed by the parties."
Israel captured the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan in the Six-Day War of 1967 and later annexed East Jerusalem and nearby suburbs, in a step never recognized internationally.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu came to office in March declaring that Jerusalem would remain the "undivided capital" of the Jewish state and has repeatedly ruled out including the future of the city in peace talks.
His predecessor, Ehud Olmert, had said Israel would have to give up parts of the city under a comprehensive peace deal.
The United States, the EU, Russia and the United Nations all regard the status of Jerusalem as one of the core issues to be settled when and if peace negotiations resume between Israel and the Palestinians on a so-called "two-state solution."
In Ramallah in the West Bank, Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad seemed visibly moved the EU statement.
"I believe it's a good day for international law, for international legitimacy, for justice and for our own people to begin to have a sense of hope about the future," he told Reuters.
He expressed the hope that "this path is going to take us to freedom to be able to live like all peoples around the world as a free people with dignity in a country of our own on the territories occupied in 1967, including East Jerusalem."
"REASON PREVAILED"
Israel's foreign ministry said it was pleased that the EU ministers had not endorsed "the extreme draft document presented by the Swedish presidency of the EU at the start of discussions" -- a document which the EU has not made public.
"We can only welcome the fact that at the end of the process the voice of those responsible and reasonable EU states prevailed," the foreign ministry in Jerusalem said.
However, it said Israel regretted that the EU "ignores the main obstacle to the achievement of a deal between Israel and the Palestinians --- the Palestinians' refusal to return to the negotiating table."
The status of Jerusalem -- a city holy to three religions -- has always been a highly sensitive issue in the Middle East peace process. The Palestinians want the eastern half as capital of a future Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza.
Ministers recalled that the EU had never recognized the annexation of East Jerusalem. They again urged Israel to halt settlement building and end "discriminatory" treatment of Palestinians in East Jerusalem.
The EU statement welcomed Israel's partial, temporary freeze on settlement construction as a first step in the right direction and hoped it would help restart talks stalled since 2008.
It also welcomed Israel's steps to ease restrictions of movement for Palestinians in the occupied West Bank by removing roadblocks and military checkpoints on some highways.
(Reporting by Julien Toyer and Luke Baker in Brussels, Joseph Nasr and Ari Rabinovitch in Jerusalem and Mohammed Assadi in Ramallah; writing by Douglas Hamilton; editing by Angus MacSwan)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Indeed, when the territories of the West Bank, Gaza and eastern Jerusalem were Jew-free, “cleansed” of their Jewish residents between the years 1948 and 1967, the Arabs of the now disputed territories did not set up their state there and didn’t set up eastern Jerusalem as their capital city.
For outsiders – and even for insiders – to now come and tell us, Jews, how to handle our eternal capital city is both arrogant and pathetic.
But of course, this would not even take place if it were not the Jewish people that is in the center of this Arab Israeli dispute. A tiny country such as Sweden, a mouse in world affairs, would not have the hutzhah to suggest to stick its nose in the internal affairs of another state.
I just wonder, why…??
Last I checked, Israel was neither a member state of the EU nor is it even located on the European continent. Since this is so, and since the age of European imperialism has been over for a while, on what basis do the Europeans feel they have the right to dictate to people elsewhere how to conduct their internal affairs?
Has Europe learned nothing from its oppression of many millions of people worldwide for so many centuries?
Does it, based on the recurrence of this kind of imperialist behavior, have the right to even be consulted?
I for one don’t think so!
Follow Reuters