U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Savvy kids can access explicit online worlds: FTC

Related Topics

High school students play a video game in a file photo. REUTERS/Mike Segar

High school students play a video game in a file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar

WASHINGTON | Thu Dec 10, 2009 4:22pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Even a minimally savvy youngster can figure out how to access violent or explicitly sexual content in some virtual or Internet worlds, the Federal Trade Commission said on Thursday.

In its survey of online worlds, where users create digital alter egos called avatars and interact with other users' avatars, the commission found that seven of the worlds with the most explicit sex and violence set a minimum age of 13 and an eighth set a minimum age of 18.

If children below age 13 attempted to register, they were rejected at five of the sites.

"However, two worlds, Kaneva and There.com, rejected child registrations, but then immediately permitted users to re-register as an adult from the same computer," the report said.

Kaneva did not respond to an attempt to reach it for comment but Michael Wilson, CEO of There.com, said that they were looking to address the situation and that they tried to keep their world relatively free of sex and violence.

"We recognize that that's a problem and we're trying to deal with it," he told Reuters. "The amount of violent content and sexual content that they'll find in There is minimal."

Red Light Center, which sets a minimum age of 18 and whose home page contains nudity, also allowed users who were rejected as too young to immediately try again with a different birthday.

"Red Light Center's main purpose is to offer sexually explicit content," the FTC report said. "Yet it employed no mechanism to limit access to underage users at the time of the Commission's study. Indeed, when the Commission selected the virtual world for inclusion in its review, demographic data from comScore, Inc. indicated that nearly 16 percent of Red Light Center's users were under age 18."

Red Light did not return a telephone call seeking comment.

As part of the report, which was requested by Congress, the commission recommended virtual world operators develop better mechanisms to screen out children and ensure that adults in these virtual worlds do not interact with children or teens.

The commission also urged better enforcement of the online world's rules regarding profanity in sites aimed at children, and training for community enforcers or moderators to enforce any rules.

(Reporting by Diane Bartz, editing by Matthew Lewis)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
wrote:
i have been telling everyone for years. THE ADULT AND PORN CONTENT SHOULD NOT BE ON THE REGULAR INTERNET. Give them their own .prn. Then allow parents, guardians, or anyone else block the .prn. And anyone putting ANY adult content on the regular internet fined and the money goes to pay law enforcement agencies who track child porn, and use it to process DNA on outstanding cases. It would make it easier for agencies going after child pornographers to find these sicko’s. And the rest of us who do not want this ADULT CRAP from invading our space!!!

Dec 10, 2009 7:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
DrunkenSailor wrote:
The .prn domain would do nothing to keep a child from seeing porn or adult content on the internet. Just as in eras before, no matter where daddy keeps his dirty pictures the kids are going to find them.

No internet filter, nanny programs or blacklist is going to keep a tech savvy kid from finding what they want to find.

It’s the responsibility of parents to monitor their child’s web habits and interactions. Any other approach will ensure their exposure to all kinds of content parents will not find appropriate for their child, not just adult oriented.

Dec 10, 2009 8:47pm EST  --  Report as abuse
franwex wrote:
It’s clear that when there is a will it’ll happen! When I was younger I would surf the internet and look at “Adult” material and then just delete the history on my browser so my parents wouldn’t find out. This is the new medium, and there are other mediums anyway like magazines. It’s impossible to alienate kids completely, the best thing to do is just talk to them about it.

Dec 11, 2009 8:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.