U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

U.S. jobless pay measure to move with defense bill

Related Topics

Related Video

Video

Clock ticks on defense bill

Fri, Dec 11 2009
An U.S Army soldier from Task Force Denali 92 MP patrols at Wazi-Zadram village in Paktya province December 11, 2009. REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra

An U.S Army soldier from Task Force Denali 92 MP patrols at Wazi-Zadram village in Paktya province December 11, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Zohra Bensemra

WASHINGTON | Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:16pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrats hope to pack a must-pass U.S. defense spending bill with measures to help victims of the ailing economy, Assistant Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin said on Friday.

But Durbin said his party will need help from Senate Republicans next week to pass the bill because he expects at least some anti-war Democrats to oppose it.

"There are some who, because this is a defense appropriations bill, feel this is a war vote," Durbin told Reuters on Capitol Hill. "They aren't going to vote for the war, directly or indirectly."

Durbin's comments highlighted the tricky politics involved as Congress rushes to finish its legislative work before lawmakers head home for the holidays.

The $630 billion-plus defense spending bill, which funds the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, normally enjoys support from a broad range of lawmakers.

Congress must pass it by December 18, when a temporary funding measure expires. For that reason, the defense bill is expected to serve as a vehicle for other measures that might not pass on their own.

The bill will contain language that would raise the federal government's $12.1 trillion debt limit by $1.8 trillion to $1.9 trillion, said House of Representatives Democratic Leader Steny Hoyer.

The Treasury Department has said Congress must raise the debt limit by the end of the year to allow the government to continue functioning.

TRYING TO CUT UNEMPLOYMENT

The defense bill also will contain an extension of jobless benefits, health insurance subsidies for the unemployed and child-care subsidies, Durbin said.

Hoyer said the jobless benefits will be extended by 6 months at a cost of roughly $50 billion.

Democrats hope to attach legislation that would bring down the 10 percent unemployment rate by funding for highway construction and bailing out cash-strapped state governments, which otherwise would have to lay off teachers, police and other public employees.

But it is still not clear whether those items will be included in the defense bill, Durbin said.

Hoyer has said he expects jobs and fiscal discipline to be the two key issues in November's congressional election.

To emphasize fiscal discipline, the House will also include a measure that requires Congress to pay for new spending or tax cuts, Hoyer said. Such "paygo" legislation has repeatedly passed the House this year but the Senate has ignored it.

Centrist Democrats in the Senate say they will not vote to raise the debt limit unless it includes language that would create a commission to bring down budget deficits. That approach is not popular with key House Democrats.

While the House and Senate do not see eye to eye on fiscal discipline measures, leaders from both chambers agree on the need to extend safety net provisions.

More than 1 million jobless Americans could exhaust their unemployment benefits if Congress does not extend them before the end of the year.

Such payments, which average roughly $300 per week, pump money into the economy and ensure the jobless do not default on their mortgages and other bills, lawmakers say.

Lawmakers will not look for a way to pay for the safety net measures because they are considered emergency spending, Hoyer said.

Other job-creating elements could be funded through the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program that was designed to bail out banks and other struggling financial companies.

(Editing by John O'Callaghan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
This sounds great until you take a closer look at this paragraph:
“Democrats hope to also attach job-creating legislation that would bring down the 10 percent unemployment rate, such as funding for highway construction, and aid to prevent states from laying off teachers, police and other public employees.”

These are all GOVERNMENT (federal, state and local)JOBS. This is not creating sustainable jobs for all citizens. The construction jobs, that would employ your average citizen, is contract work that only lasts so long. Think about this line:
“and aid to prevent states from laying off teachers, police and other public employees.”
How can you DROP CURRENT unemployment rates by preventing possible lay-offs in the future?? You drop them by creating real sustainable jobs for ALL CITIZENS not just those that work for the government.
Nice how they attached it to defense spending for our troops so that they can get it passed.

Dec 11, 2009 12:33pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Ananke wrote:
The government doesn’t have much choice – the other alternative is heavy trade protectionism. I believe protectionism will happen anyway, since every meaningful job has been outsourced to Asia already.

Dec 11, 2009 2:26pm EST  --  Report as abuse
That’s what they want you to believe but it is simply not true. If they had invested the “stimulus” in the citizens and not the corporations, most people would have paid off debts, traded in that old car (that didn’t qualify for Cash for clunkers) for something newer because they had the cash to buy it with. Those without homes could have bought them for cash (plenty of cheap homes then and more so now) and that would have helped the housing problem. It would have kicked almost EVERYONE off of public assistance and jump started our economy while shrinking the welfare, medicaid and medicare debt of every state, reducing the burden on the federal government while generating a TON of TAX revenue to help reduce the national debt. How many new small business’s would have been created, how many would have expanded?? Instead we have a government that thinks they can spend more money we don’t have to “spend our way out of debt”????
I argue we are spending our way into socialism in American. God help us all.

Dec 11, 2009 4:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.