U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

$447 billon spending bill clears Senate hurdle

Related Topics

The U.S. Capitol building is seen before the start of President Barack Obama's primetime address to a joint session of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives on Capitol Hill in Washington, February 24, 2009. REUTERS/Jim Young

The U.S. Capitol building is seen before the start of President Barack Obama's primetime address to a joint session of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives on Capitol Hill in Washington, February 24, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Jim Young

WASHINGTON | Sat Dec 12, 2009 2:55pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A $447 billion bill that would fund dozens of U.S. government agencies through September cleared a procedural hurdle in the U.S. Senate Saturday and appeared to be headed for passage.

The Senate vote, 60 to 34, cleared the way for senators to give the measure final congressional passage Sunday. The House of Representatives passed the measure Thursday with no Republicans voting for it.

The Democratic-controlled Congress must pass the bill and President Barack Obama must sign it by December 18 or extend a temporary measure to keep the federal government running.

The measure would boost spending for building high-speed rail and beefing up oversight of financial markets.

It also would boost lending programs for small businesses, which the Obama administration has identified as a way to bring down the nation's 10 percent unemployment rate.

Needle-exchange programs -- intended to ensure that diseases such as AIDS are not spread by infected needles shared by injection drug users -- would have an easier time getting federal funding under the measure. Abstinence-only sex-education programs for schoolchildren would get less money.

The measure would fund numerous government agencies through the rest of the 2010 fiscal year, which ends next September 30. Fiscal 2010 began on October 1, but Congress has not passed spending bills for the year. In fact, Congress has not passed spending bills on time since 1994.

Lawmakers next week are expected to take up the largest spending bill of all -- a $600 billion-plus measure that funds the Pentagon, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

(Reporting by Andy Sullivan and Deborah Charles; Editing by Will Dunham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
breezinthru wrote:
Abstinence only sex education programs are getting less money?!!! They shouldn’t be getting any money at all. That’s utterly ridiculous!

Dec 12, 2009 11:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
fredgarvin wrote:
Yeah!…who needs anything like that. Just give’em condoms and the pill. If those don’t work, just let’em have abortions. Let our kids grow up with no moral values! No need to teach them restraint in any part of their lives. Instant satisfaction for them is the way to go! Let’em have all the sex with condoms and pills that they want and abortions when they don’t work. That’s they way it should be!

Dec 13, 2009 10:55am EST  --  Report as abuse
johnathang wrote:
No one said abstinence education would be banned. In fact, it’s likely that funding is being redirected to comprehensive sex ed, which is most accurately described as “Abstinence first – but not only.” I’m all for telling kids not to have sex, but let’s get real – some of them are going to do it, and they should know what their options are (pills, condoms, etc) and they should be told the real world proven effectiveness rates of various forms of contraception. So that they know even with it, there is a risk of pregnancy.

Dec 13, 2009 3:46pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.