Read
- IRS official refuses to answer questions at scandal hearing
|
- Global stocks, oil fall after Bernanke; dollar gains
|
- Oklahoma tornado victims astounded at how they survived
|
- CORRECTED-White House threatens veto of bill to bypass Obama on Keystone
- Man linked to Boston bombing suspect killed by FBI in Florida
Sponsored Links
Copenhagen summit carbon footprint biggest ever: report
COPENHAGEN |
COPENHAGEN (Reuters) - The Copenhagen climate talks will generate more carbon emissions than any previous climate conference, equivalent to the annual output of over half a million Ethiopians, figures commissioned by hosts Denmark show.
Delegates, journalists, activists and observers from almost 200 countries have gathered at the Dec 7-18 summit and their travel and work will create 46,200 tonnes of carbon dioxide, most of it from their flights.
This would fill nearly 10,000 Olympic swimming pools, and is the same amount produced each year by 2,300 Americans or 660,000 Ethiopians -- the vast difference is due to the huge gap in consumption patterns in the two countries -- according to U.S. government statistics about per person emissions in 2006.
Despite efforts by the Danish government to reduce the conference's carbon footprint, around 5,700 tonnes of carbon dioxide will be created by the summit and a further 40,500 tonnes created by attendees' flights to Copenhagen.
The figure for the flights was calculated by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), while the domestic carbon footprint from the summit was calculated by accountants Deloitte, said Deloitte consultant Stine Balslev.
"This is much bigger than the last talks because there are many more people here," she said, adding that 18,000 people were expected to pass through the conference center every day.
"These are preliminary figures but we expect that when we do the final calculations after the conference is over, the carbon footprint will be about the same."
Deloitte included in their calculations emissions caused by accommodation, local transport, electricity and heating of the conference center, paper, security, transport of goods and services as well as energy used by computers, kitchens, photocopiers and printers inside the conference center.
Accommodation accounted for 23 percent of the summit's greenhouse gas emissions in Copenhagen, while transport caused 7 percent. Seventy percent came from activities inside the conference center, she said.
"We have been forced to put up some temporary buildings in order to provide the delegation rooms because the number of participants is so much larger than expected," said Balslev.
"For instance the U.S. delegation has ordered an area that's five times as big as last year."
The temporary buildings housing delegation offices are not well insulated and are warmed by oil heaters, so this area is the most energy-wasteful, she said.
The researchers assumed that 60 percent of conference participants would catch public transport to and from the conference but Balslev said that was probably optimistic.
Balslev said most of the energy used by the conference was from coal fired power stations that power the electricity grid, but some was from wind power.
(Additional reporting by Emma Graham-Harrison, Editing by Dominic Evans)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
1) As if there would be no one driving, working or visiting in Copenhagen if there was no conference here.
2) People have been trying to get some traction with a “environmentalists are wasting XXX resources at conference” story for weeks. Give up.
Cap the food supply and Trade abundance for scarcity and famine.
CO2 is a greenhouse gas for good reason: green=photosynthesis, photosynthesis requires C02 and light. Consequently, limiting atmospheric CO2 emissions will suffocate plants and turns the green to brown. High levels of greenhouse production are achieved by controlling CO2 and light; i.e.: increased greenhouse production is accomplished using bottled or gas-generated CO2 and oftentimes even artificial light to promote the photosynthesis required to make plants grow and produce. Pumping large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere also stimulates plant growth. The burning of fossil fuels and the resulting tons of carbon emissions can be claimed responsible, at least in part, for the abundance of the food supply during the last century thereby helping us to avoid the Malthusian famines predicted for our day over 200 years ago. Luckily, Parkinson’s Law of photosynthesis indicates that vegetation will expand to deplete the CO2 in the atmosphere regardless of the source and/or the amount released into the atmosphere. Bottom line: drive your car, heat and cool your home, create as much CO2 as possible, your may just be saving the planet for others and preventing a future famine!
Green = Photosynthesis. Photosynthesis requires CO2 and sunlight. Why not associate the increased worldwide food production as actually being made possible by the increased CO2 emissions be they man made or otherwise. Burning coal, oil, and driving your SUV may actually help prevent famine and food shortages in our future. On the other hand, preventing CO2 emissions slows photosynthesis and equates with going brown not green.
CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) is the most friendly gas in our atmosphere. CO2 remains as a trace gas because photosynthesis converts it to O2 (Oxygen) almost immediately. We need mega-tons of CO2 to be put into our atmosphere daily to grow our food for an expanding population of the world. Our food supply depends on the CO2 emissions of SUVs, Volcanoes, Fires, and Plant-rot, to supply this essential greenhouse gas at sufficient levels to ward off famine. By the way, current levels of CO2 have been measured at 385 p.p.m., yet a good greenhouse requires 4 to 5 times that level to get a decent green plant production. To avoid a famine the government regulators better hope they do not lower the atmospheric level of CO2 from current levels; in fact, they should hope CO2 levels will rise to accommodate the increasing global food supply requirement, otherwise, world-wide anthropogenic famine!


Follow Reuters