African protest hits U.N. climate talks in final week

COPENHAGEN Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:36pm EST

1 of 25. Thousands of protestors march during a demonstration in Copenhagen December 12, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Christian Charisius

Related Topics

COPENHAGEN (Reuters) - A protest by African nations accusing rich countries of doing too little to cut greenhouse gas emissions slowed U.N. climate talks on Monday just four days before world leaders are due to forge a deal in Copenhagen.

After a five-hour standoff, the African nations let talks restart after assurances their objections would be heard. They accused the rich of trying to kill off the Kyoto Protocol, which obliges many industrialized nations to cut emissions until 2012.

"We're talking again," said Kemal Djemouai, an Algerian official who leads the group of African nations at the December 7-18 meeting. Talks on a pact to succeed Kyoto have been sluggish since they started two years ago in Bali, Indonesia.

But negotiators have scant time to reach a new U.N. deal to fight global warming at a summit of 110 world leaders on Friday, shifting the world economy from fossil fuels in a bid to avert heatwaves, floods, mudslides or rising sea levels.

In Washington, the White House said President Barack Obama was working this week to help advance the Copenhagen talks ahead of his visit for the summit.

And White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said developing countries such as China and India would have to do their part to reach a climate accord. China is the top greenhouse gas emitter ahead of the United States.

After overcoming the African objections in Copenhagen, negotiators on Monday appointed pairs of ministers from poor and rich nations to seek solutions to the most contentious issues ahead of the summit.

Ghana and Britain would examine ways to raise billions of dollars in new funds to help the poor, Grenada and Spain would look at disputes about sharing out the burden of emissions cuts by 2020. Singapore and Norway would look at a possible levy on bunker fuels to help raise funds.

Despite the huge amount of work ahead, U.S. climate envoy Todd Stern said: "The desire will be that nothing is booted upstairs," for Obama and other world leaders to hash out when they arrive in Copenhagen.

Earlier, African delegates said that the rich were trying ditch the Kyoto Protocol, which binds almost 40 industrialized nations to cut greenhouse gas emissions by at least 5.2 percent below 1990 levels by 2008-12.

KILL KYOTO

Australian Climate Minister Penny Wong accused the African nations of staging a "walkout" and said it was "not the time for procedural games" so close to the end of the meeting, for which 35,000 people are registered.

At the heart of the dispute, developing nations want to extend the 1997 Kyoto Protocol and work out a separate new deal for the poor. But most rich nations want to merge Kyoto into a single new accord obliging all nations to fight global warming.

Industrialized nations want a single track largely because the United States never ratified Kyoto. They fear signing up for a binding new Kyoto while Washington slips away with a less strict regime [nLDE5BD1DU].

In a sign of the impacts of warming, a report by former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere said world sea levels could rise by up to 2 meters by 2100, with worrying signs of a thaw in Antarctica.

"It is now estimated that sea levels will rise between 0.5 and 1.5 meters by 2100, and in the worst case by 2.0 meters. This will affect many hundreds of millions of people living in coastal areas," they said in a report.

Maldives President Mohamed Nasheed said that it may be too late to help low-lying island states. "If all the developed nations stop their emissions today, and if we take business as usual, we will still drown," he said.

And a group of activists dressed as polar bears staged a protest urging the talks to "save the humans."

Differing from the African nations, a senior Chinese envoy said that developing nations' top concern was to secure funds from the rich to pay for carbon emissions cuts and cover the cost of adapting to a warmer world [nLDE5BD1I3].

"If you list them in order of priorities, the most pressing issues where developing countries want to see results are: firstly finance, secondly emissions reduction targets, third technology transfer," He Yafei, China's deputy foreign minister, told Reuters.

Many world leaders will turn up early to try to bridge the gaps. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown would travel to Copenhagen on Tuesday, his office said.

Brown hopes to meet Australia's Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg and Ethiopia's Prime Minister Meles Zenawi before other leaders begin arriving.

Organizers said the formal start of the intensive, high-level stage of talks in Copenhagen would be held on Tuesday evening (1630 GMT), when U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon will address an opening ceremony.

(With extra reporting by Emma Graham-Harrison, Gerard Wynn, Richard Cowan, Sunanda Creagh, Writing by Alister Doyle; Editing by Dominic Evans)

For Reuters latest environment blogs, click on: blogs.reuters.com/environment/

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Thermoguy wrote:
My comments are not to say emissions are good but there is missing information in the climate change argument and all countries should be very concerned.

What do all the countries in Copenhagen have in common? All of their countries are literally blind to temperature from academia to policy. We use calculators for the temperatures we design for and the entire building industry is signed off as compliant, then insured.

Here is a link to objective science completed to see the cause of urban heat islands and the massive energy used to treat the symptoms every year. Buildings are effectively sunburned except they aren’t designed for these temperatures and we are reacting to symptoms with massive emissions while the buildings are close to boiling temperature heating the atmosphere. www.thermoguy.com/urbanheat.html

Dec 14, 2009 10:54am EST  --  Report as abuse
west129 wrote:
Excellent progress! The ‘underdeveloped’ nations are fast learners in deed. They now skillfully apply the same tactics of strong arming that so successfully has been used by the rich ‘developed’ nation: What goes around comes around. Time will expose those AGW disciples for what they are, troops to implement global communism.

Dec 14, 2009 2:25pm EST  --  Report as abuse
OnandOn wrote:
My scary monster analogy…

Uncle Al and some well paid scientists are paid if they support AGW. Uncle Al tells you and all the children that they are going to die because a big scary monster lurks just around the corner. The funders of this witch hunt, also have a solution for you. It`s a feel good, instant fix that only requires that you blame yourself so that you feel good about punishing yourself with a new tax. This tax money will save the world, save the children, save the polar bears (which might move to Alberta soon). All you have to do is stop asking questions so that they can get the new tax in place. No more questioning the science. It`s over, the monster exists and will eat you all up if you don`t act now.

After this monster is tamed/owned on a global level, then the next monster is actually very real and it`s called Overpopulation. Only this time they don`t need anything from you to deal with overpopulation, because the first monster is funding socialism. A lifestyle that monster believers will usher in out of fear control, which is a natural conclusion when global energy/economies are under central control.

Also…

politicians are vying for position in a global economy, which involves cap and trade, which controls global energy, which in turn controls the economy, which in turn controls us, which is socialism. You don`t have to be a socialist to usher in socialism, just hungry for power.

Dec 14, 2009 5:00pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.