Clinton outlines human rights policy
WASHINGTON |
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Secretary of State Hillary Clinton unveiled a U.S. human rights agenda on Monday calling for universal standards that apply to all nations, prompting rights groups to urge the administration to live up to its rhetoric.
Just days after President Barack Obama accepted the Nobel Peace Prize while defending the concept of a just war, Clinton outlined a human rights policy calling for people to be free from tyranny but also free to "seize the opportunities of a full life."
Human rights experts said the speech was important, coming at a time when the Obama administration's message on human rights had become increasingly muddied but they said the proof would be in the administration's actions.
Clinton angered rights groups in February when she said U.S. concerns about human rights in China would not disrupt financial or other diplomatic relations with Beijing.
An op-ed piece in The Washington Post sharply criticized the administration on Sunday, saying that "from China to Sudan, from Burma to Iran, a president lauded for his commitment to peace has dialed down a U.S. commitment to human rights."
Clinton, in her speech at Georgetown University, outlined a pragmatic approach toward human rights that would press for democratic principles and development but be flexible in the methods it used to pursue the policy.
"This administration, like others before us, will promote, support and defend democracy," she said. "Democracy has proven the best political system for making human rights a reality over the long term."
Clinton said a commitment to human rights started with universal principles. She noted that Obama wanted Guantanamo prison closed and had issued an executive order his second day in office prohibiting the use of torture by any U.S. official.
She said the United States would report next year on human trafficking both at home and abroad, and would participate in a U.N. review of "our own human rights record, just as we encourage other nations to do."
Rights experts welcomed the address, but said the administration must follow through.
"It goes a long way to laying out a vision of where human rights sits in the Obama administration," said Sarah Mendelson, head of the Human Rights and Security Initiative at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank.
PHILOSOPHICAL SHIFT
She said Clinton's discussion of the United States' own compliance with human rights principles was a philosophical shift from the Bush administration.
"By placing our own human rights record as fundamental ... that is really, I think for a lot of us, very critical, very important," Mendelson said.
Amnesty International said Clinton "rightly identifies accountability as the centerpiece of any successful human rights agenda for the United States."
"But if the administration means what it says, then it needs to follow through and back up rhetoric with action. Discussion of human rights can't be an empty rebranding exercise."
Clinton said the administration's approach to pursuing its rights agenda would be "pragmatic and agile," upholding its principles but "doing what is most likely to make them real."
"When old approaches aren't working, we won't be afraid to attempt new ones," Clinton said, pointing to the recent U.S. efforts at engaging the military-led government in Myanmar after years of trying to isolate it.
She said the United States would approach major powers like China and Russia with "principled pragmatism," recognizing that cooperation is critical to the global economy and for dealing with security issues like North Korea's nuclear program.
In both countries, she said, the United States would engage with the government as well as individuals or groups that are working to advance human rights and democracy.
"We support change driven by citizens and their communities," Clinton said. "The project of making human rights a human reality cannot be just a project for governments. It requires cooperation among individuals and organizations."
(Editing by Eric Beech)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
The instigators of MOCKINGBIRD were Frank Wisner, Allan Dulles, Richard Helms and Philip Graham. Graham was the husband of Katherine Graham, today’s publisher of the Washington Post. In fact, it was the Post’s ties to the CIA that allowed it to grow so quickly after the war, both in readership and influence. (8)
MOCKINGBIRD was extraordinarily successful. In no time, the agency had recruited at least 25 media organizations to disseminate CIA propaganda. At least 400 journalists would eventually join the CIA payroll, according to the CIA’s testimony before a stunned Church Committee in 1975. (The committee felt the true number was considerably higher.) The names
8 of 20 11/24/09 4:31 PM
The Origins of the Overclass http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-overclass.html
of those recruited reads like a Who’s Who of journalism:
Philip and Katharine Graham (Publishers, Washington Post) William Paley (President, CBS) Henry Luce (Publisher, Time and Life magazine) Arthur Hays Sulzberger (Publisher, N.Y. Times)
Jerry O’Leary (Washington Star) Hal Hendrix (Pulitzer Prize winner, Miami News) Barry Bingham Sr., (Louisville Courier-Journal) James Copley (Copley News Services) Joseph Harrison (Editor, Christian Science Monitor) C.D. Jackson (Fortune) Walter Pincus (Reporter, Washington Post) ABC NBC Associated Press United Press International Reuters Hearst Newspapers Scripps-Howard Newsweek magazine Mutual Broadcasting System Miami Herald Old Saturday Evening Post New York Herald-Tribune
Women Combat Veterans Needed
Women combat veterans with PTSD are suffering a serious injury which is treatable but the military and the Dept. of Veterans Affairs and the general public will not accept this reality.
I can only tell all of you that from my generation of Vietnam Marine combat veterans it is the veterans who help out one another. I’m not talking group and drugs but only other combat veterans will understand this “headache”.
I will tell you to be very aware of what the VA gives you regarding medications as many of the meds will only cause you more problems; of mind and body.
I will tell you to call on the inner strength you do have and do not drink! That will only make everything really worse.
Walk if you are able, drive if you can across this country, and for those who can handle the administrative process get yourself in to a small community college and read and read and write and for me and many others this worked.
It’s a therapy and has stress but nothing like the combat zone type. You will be surrounded by hundreds in a training environment which means everyone has issues and you will actually get a sense on safety and a sense of completion every 16 weeks.
The VA will eventually pay you for the hours spend in a college.
Do not expect the VA to do anything for you, you must be strong and it was your strength that allowed you to survive this far. Don’t wait for the American society to welcome you, which is all BS. Welcome yourself and get on with life as a civilian. Failing sorry for yourself is nowhere.
Get into a school and pursue whatever you what to be a part of educationally, it works. The rank in the civilian world is the degree and you with the level of military training can and will outpace any little rich kid who had his mommy making his bed while you were protecting his rich daddy’s stock holdings. That’s a fact.
Again, don’t wait for the VA or society as it doesn’t work that way. They both want to shove you under the rug as they did my group. You can make it and do not drink or fall into the feel sorry rap to the drug thing. Sempre Fi….a former door gunner 1970-71 USMC (H) And don’t forget to register to vote as that was one of the hidden reasons you were over there. Do it!
Respect to all of you, been there, done that, and now I’m a candidate for the Florida 2010 United States Senator as an Independent. I have been assisting fellow PTSD veterans with their claims for close to 30 years. If you’re in Florida, read my site and know my focus is on veterans and that includes you. One last thing. Email me if you want to get involved. I’m not taking any corporate funds and I need a few good people and I’d love to have a few former combat people on my team. Thanks, Jorge Antonio Lovenguth George@lovenguth.org



Follow Reuters