US needs plan to tame debt soon, experts say

WASHINGTON | Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:20pm EST

WASHINGTON Dec 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. government must craft a plan next year to get its ballooning debt under control or face possible panic in financial markets, a bipartisan panel of budget experts said in a report on Monday.

Though the government should hold off on immediate tax hikes and spending cuts to avoid harming the fragile economic recovery, it will need to make such painful changes by 2012 in order to keep debt at a manageable 60 percent of GDP by 2018, according to the Peterson-Pew Commission on Budget Reform.

Without action, investors could lose confidence in the United States, driving down the dollar and forcing up interest rates, said the former lawmakers and budget officials who crafted the report. That could cause a sharp decrease in the country's standard of living.

"We will be less free if we don't tackle this," said Jim Nussle, a Republican member of the commission who earlier served as a White House budget director and chairman of the budget committee in the U.S. House of Representatives.

The 34-member commission published its report as Congress was poised to raise the debt limit from its current $12.1 trillion level to allow the government to continue operating.

The national debt has more than doubled since 2001, thanks to the worst recession since the 1930s, several rounds of tax cuts and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

A looming wave of retirements over the coming decade is expected to make the situation worse.

The national debt currently accounts for 53 percent of GDP, up from 41 percent a year ago. That's likely to rise to 85 percent of GDP by 2018 and 200 percent of GDP by 2038 unless dramatic changes are made, the commission said.

The commission did not issue specific prescriptions but said tax increases and spending cuts would probably be needed.

It said Congress and the Obama administration should set specific targets each year, with automatic spending reductions and tax increases kicking in if they are not reached.

The Democratic-controlled Congress is unlikely to fix the problem on its own given the highly partisan atmosphere, commission members said.

"You've got to have a few Republican votes, and there have been none. And there has been no possible way in the current political system yet to find that sensible center," said former Democratic Representative Charlie Stenholm.

The commission backed the creation of an outside commission, similar to one used to close miliary bases, to create the necessary political cover.

Such a proposal is included in a crush of year-end legislation that could clear Congress this week but it is opposed by many key Democrats.

The United States must act to ensure that it does not join Dubai, Greece, and other countries that risk losing the confidence of investors, the commission said.

"It's imperative that we take action before the financial markets force us to," said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former Congressional Budget Office director who advised Republican John McCain's presidential campaign last year. (Editing by David Storey)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (53)
Anonymouse wrote:
According to the BEA, the US GDP as of 3rd Quarter 2009 was $14,266.3 billion ($14.3 trillion). How then is $12.1 trillion of debt equal to 53% of GDP? Kind of wrecks the credibility of this story

Dec 14, 2009 7:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
RightStuff wrote:
President Obama doesn’t care about debt. He doesn’t care that the Federal government over-taxes the citizens. Medicare and Social Security are facing a combined unfunded liability of $105 TRILLION by the year 2020, and current debt is approximately $13 TRILLION, or almost four times the annual budget of the United States. A Marxist will do all he can to destroy the capitalist economic system so that he can replace it with a corrupt socialist syetem. Why do you think that Barack Obama is always trash-talking the free market system. He wants to brainwash you into believing that it is BAD, BAD, BAD. Well, after a few years of socialism, we will know what BAD, BAD, BAD really is. March on, quislings.

Dec 14, 2009 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Lt_Scrounge wrote:
The tax rate cuts did not contribute to the debt issues as they have historically resulted in tax revenue increases. The problem is that damn politicians in DC not keeping their fingers out of the cookie jar. There were record HIGH revenues during the last few quarters of the Bush administration as the tax cuts stimulated investment and economic growth. The problem was that no matter how high the REVENUES are the politicians seem to want to spend even more than is coming in. Perhaps the smartest thing to do would be to force a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution, eliminate the ability of Congressmen and Senators to add earmarks for pet projects to bills, and require that EVERY law and expenditure passes a Constitutional “smell test”. If the bill or expenditure doesn’t smell like it is something the founding fathers would’ve approved of, then it is unacceptable and can not be funded. Imagine how much money would be saved if we eliminated the idiotic pork barrel spending? How about we reduce the annual expenditure to people on welfare, food stamps and public housing (none of which are Constitutional) to 10% of the federal budget? Make it proportional to the amount of taxes collected. Stop providing incentives to companies to drill for oil in other countries while preventing them from drilling here. Stop preventing companies from building the refineries and nuclear power plants we need. Think of the economic benefit of those contruction projects and the jobs they’d provide. Good paying jobs that increase tax revenues while reducing energy costs, freeing up more money for consumer spending that would also stimulate the economy AND produce more tax revenues. The threat of higher tax rates is stifling investment and business growth. Since the government pays its bill with revenues, not rates, doesn’t it make sense to do what has historically always increased revenues? Reduce rates and cut spending. THAT will solve the problem by increasing the GDP. A trillion dollars is 50% of a two trillion dollar GDP. It’s only 25% of a four trillion dollar GDP. GDP GROWTH is the solution, not higher tax rates.

Dec 14, 2009 8:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.