Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
Message of humility
A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity. Slideshow
Sponsored Links
Craigslist CEO: Was told eBay's Whitman a "monster"
1 of 2. Meg Whitman, former president and CEO of eBay Inc, speaks during the third session of the 2008 Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minnesota in this file photo taken September 3, 2008.
Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar/Files
WILMINGTON, Delaware |
WILMINGTON, Delaware (Reuters) - Craigslist's chief executive told a court on Monday that an executive with eBay, a minority shareholder, warned him to improve relations with eBay's then-CEO Meg Whitman because she could be a "monster" and "an Evil Meg" when frustrated.
Craigslist's Jim Buckmaster testified that eBay Inc's dealmaker, Garrett Price, cautioned in an email that Craigslist was driving Whitman "to distraction" seven months after the auction company became a shareholder.
"He said he needed to tell me there were two Meg Whitmans. We had met and reached an agreement with Good Meg. There was another Meg, an Evil Meg. We would be best served to know that Meg could be a monster when she got angry and frustrated," Buckmaster told a court in Georgetown, Delaware.
Price later denied the allegations.
"Today's testimony by Jim Buckmaster concerning comments I allegedly made about Meg Whitman was false and malicious," he said in a statement.
EBay is suing to restore its stake, which Craigslist diluted to 24.85 pct, to 28.4 percent and to regain its board seat in Craigslist, where it became a shareholder in 2004.
In a week's worth of testimony in Delaware Chancery Court, executives from two of the most prominent Internet companies testified to a series of missteps and betrayals that led to the unraveling of their relationship.
A ruling on the case may come as early as January.
EBay said that after it launched the Kijiji online classified business in 2007 in the United States, where Craigslist is the dominant player, Buckmaster hatched a "coercive plan" to dilute eBay's stake and eliminate its board seat.
Craigslist, meanwhile, has sued eBay in San Francisco, saying the larger rival used its board seat to glean confidential information about the classified ad business.
Buckmaster, who began testifying late on Friday, was the sole witness on Monday, and was questioned for more than five hours by Craigslist's attorney.
Much of the hearing was dedicated to questions about eBay's access to and use of confidential Craigslist information.
Buckmaster also described an eBay proposal for international cooperation, and Craigslist's counterproposal, in the months after eBay became a shareholder.
Price's warning to Buckmaster about Whitman was apparently aimed at speeding up the talks about cooperation, but the two companies never agreed on a joint overseas plan.
EBay bought its stake in Craigslist in 2004 from Philip Knowlton, a disgruntled former Craigslist employee.
Whitman, who is now running for Governor of California, testified last week that she had considered Craigslist her company's "play" in classifieds, an area she expected to grow rapidly.
An email that was introduced on Monday as a basis for questioning seemed to highlight eBay's frustrations. The Craigslist business was a "rocket ship" that was "doing fantastic," wrote an eBay executive in March 2005.
However, in the same message the executive described a meeting with Buckmaster as "quite an experience" and said Craigslist's staff were "definitely from another planet."
The hearing adjourned until Tuesday, when eBay's attorney is expected to cross-examine Buckmaster.
The trial is taking place in Delaware, where Craigslist is incorporated, and is broadcast over Courtroom View Network.
The case is eBay Domestic Holdings Inc v Newmark, et al, Delaware Chancery Court, No. 3705-CC.
(Additional reporting by Ian Sherr in San Francisco; Editing by Christian Wiessner)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Unimportant Note: Also one does not “testify to a {series of missteps and betrayals}” as these are not persons capable of evaluation. “Testify” even in verb form does not meet the requirements of the sentence and should be replaced. “Disclosed a series” or an equivalent would be more appropriate: exposed, revealed, divulged, etc. – another alternate, but decidedly ineloquent, choice would be “testified about [or of].”
This original word choice may be one of taste or personal obligation to a rule of court room jargon, but it lacks clarity, which is necessary and, even so, finds itself redundant in the face of the prior use of “testimony.” Even if used as if one “spoke to” a certain circumstance or situation in regards of “giving light to,” hence disclosing, the word “testified” is then an inflated word, for which the less profound “spoke” would be more appropriate.
Note: Word italics were lost in formatting so are converted to “”.
In turn you are hardly capable of evaluation in any case: a word cannot “find itself redundant” but is only adjudged as such by a less static party. Moreover if you wish to engage in barrelfish shooting by disclosing, exposing, revealing, divulging or even testifying to properties of poor Net writing, you could excise paragraphs self-deemed “unimportant” and remember that the word “journalism” does not carry a higher-case J when deployed mid-sentence.
Note: no italics were abused in the composition of this post.
The person who posted it seems to be a bit tone deaf with regards to what does and does not possess “flair”. Self-righteous and windy lectures on the correct uses of grammar and syntax can be a real challenge to render with “flair” as was brilliantly demonstrated by the post above.
Follow Reuters