House to vote on jobs bill this week

Related Topics

Gary Simpson, an employee at the Virginia Employment Commission office, posts job postings at the office in Alexandria, Virginia November 6, 2009. REUTERS/Molly Riley

Gary Simpson, an employee at the Virginia Employment Commission office, posts job postings at the office in Alexandria, Virginia November 6, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Molly Riley

WASHINGTON | Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:16pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The House of Representatives aims to pass legislation this week to create jobs and reduce the impact of the worst recession since the 1930s, Democratic leaders said on Tuesday.

One bill will include $48 billion for ready-to-go construction projects and $27 billion to cash-strapped states to keep teachers, police and other public-sector employees on the payroll. Another measure would help small businesses obtain loans and extend jobless benefits.

About half of the $150 billion price tag will be paid for with money from a $700 billion federal fund for bank bailouts approved by Congress last year.

"We make no apology whatsoever for trying to give the same amount of attention to Main Street needs as was given earlier to Wall Street needs," said House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey.

Democratic leaders predicted that the House would pass the legislation on Wednesday. While the safety-net measures could become law by next week, the Senate is not expected to consider the jobs package until next month at the earliest.

"It is legislation that brings jobs to Main Street by increasing credit for small businesses, by rebuilding the infrastructure of America, by keeping police and fireman and teachers on the job," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters.

House Democratic Leader Steny Hoyer said monthly job losses have begun to decline but what is needed is job growth.

"We made progress, but we have not had success," Hoyer said, adding that the "Jobs for Main Street" legislation would deliver.

The jobs measures are tempered by concerns over record budget deficits and a logjam in the Senate, which is tied up with a proposed overhaul of the U.S. healthcare system.

Though the economy has begun to recover, voter anxiety remains and the unemployment rate is expected to stay stubbornly high into next year.

President Barack Obama and his fellow Democrats hope to bring down the 10 percent unemployment rate before the November 2010 congressional elections, but do not want to give further ammunition to Republicans who say spending is out of control.

SAFETY-NET EXTENSIONS

Democrats aim to ultimately extend jobless benefits by six months, though they plan a quick two-month extension for now. Health-care subsidies for the jobless would be extended as well, and food-stamp programs would get an infusion of cash.

Those extensions will be combined with a $630 billion military-spending bill. Considered must-pass legislation, the defense bill could be signed into law by Obama next week.

The money for "shovel ready" infrastructure projects and for cash-strapped states will come up for a vote separately, and the Senate is not expected to take it up until January.

Highway construction programs will get $27.5 billion, while transit programs will get $8.4 billion, said House Transportation Committee Chairman James Oberstar.

The package provides $2 billion for upgrades to drinking-water systems and $2 billion for affordable housing, according to a summary provided by aides.

It provides $23 billion to help states pay teacher salaries and $2 billion for Americorps and other public jobs, as well as job training. It also would pay the salaries of 5,000 police officers.

Bailed-out banks will return $185 billion to the Troubled Asset Relief Program, according to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. But Congress will only be able to use $75 billion of that money for jobs due to budgeting rules, Hoyer said.

The jobs package will also include $24 billion to help states pay for health insurance for the poor, Obey said. Like the other safety-net provisions, it will not be paid for with TARP money.

The legislation would also extend loosened regulations on government-backed loans to small businesses, by eliminating fees and raising to 90 percent the amount of the loan backed by the U.S. Small Business Administration.

Both the state aid and the infrastructure spending would continue programs started in the $787 billion stimulus package passed in February. Many states warn that their budgets will "fall off a cliff" when the money from that package runs out.

(Additional reporting by Deborah Charles and Lisa Lambert; Editing by Leslie Adler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
jss wrote:
A simple Stimulus Package that would work not only for the American Public but also for the banks and business.

I am 63 years old, a Vietnam Vet and have worked for one company for 32 years, I was laid off in June 2009 and had to go on Social Security, and my wife has been unemployed for 2 years after she was laid off after working for the same company for 24 years. Have, Remember this is all Common Sense something that is missing in all levels of Government from Federal, State and Local.

In 2008 the population of the United States was 304,059,724 people if we say that the average family is made up of 4 people then there would be 76,014,493 families in the United States. Even if we say that the family is made up of 2 people then that number would be 152,028,586 million families. If the government would give each family $2 Million, TAX FREE, that would come out to a little over $152 Million or little over $300 million not $700 Billion. The money could be taken from the Tarp Funds that Congress has already approved.

Remember there is no such thing as a free lunch. Here is my idea of how the money should be used. Most if not all this information could be supplied to the government since every type of debit has a Social Security Number on it. The government will issue all the checks. Since this will be tax free money to the people when Banks and Companies report Income at the of the end year they will have to pay Taxes on all the income from the loans being paid off. The government and the American People get money back.

1. Outstanding Student Loans would be paid before checks are sent to families who have Student Loans
2. Mortgages, for those who have them, would be paid before checks are sent
3. For those without mortgages they can either buy a home or use the money to pay rent
4. Credit card debit would be paid before checks are sent
5. Car loans would be paid before checks are sent
6. After the above is done what is left goes to each Legal American Family

If more money is needed for this program the government could use more of the Trap Funds.

Here is what the American People get out of this.

1. By using IRS Records and Social Security Numbers we will find out how many Legal U S Citizens there are in the country
2. Give everyone a fresh start and get the Economy moving again
3. More money for new Student Loans
4. More jobs since people have money to buy again
5. Less welfare
6. with what is left they will be able live the American dream

Here is why it will not work

1. Congress feels that only they know what the American People want and need
2. Big Business and Big Banks will not be able to use OUR MONEY to pay out big bonus
3. Congress can’t figure out how to take credit for these

I am sure that some people will not like this idea since they will say that the really rich don’t need the money, well we are told that between 1 % to 3 % of the population controls approx 90 % of the money so we are only talking about approx 2 million families a small price to pay to help 97 % to 99 % of the population

Dec 15, 2009 2:34pm EST  --  Report as abuse
beesnees wrote:
Actually, 76,014,493 X 2,000,000 = 152,028,986,000,000; that’s 152 trillion, substantially more than 700 billion. Were the money funding TARP divided equally among each family in America (presupposing four members), the quotient would equal about $9,209.

Dec 15, 2009 2:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
seanhughes wrote:
your math stinks! Thats 2 dollars per family. You take the 150 million families and multiply by 2 million dollars not 2! You sound like an officer of the congressional budget office!

Dec 15, 2009 3:02pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.