Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Sex equally satisfying with circumcised men: study

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Thu Dec 17, 2009 1:28pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Women find sex just as pleasurable with circumcised men as with men who are uncircumcised, a new study suggests.

Some experts have speculated that removal of the foreskin might make sex less pleasurable for women. But in the study, conducted in Uganda, the overwhelming majority of women indicated that sex was equally satisfying, if not more so, after their partners were circumcised.

The study, published in the latest issue of BJU International, did not examine the effect of circumcision on male sexual satisfaction. But one of the study's authors, Dr. Ronald H. Gray, told Reuters Health in an email, "We previously reported on this and found no effects on (male sexual) function or satisfaction."

The finding could help curb the spread of HIV/AIDS by allaying widespread concern that women find sex with circumcised men less satisfying. "The finding that circumcision does not adversely affect female satisfaction should increase acceptability of the procedure," said Gray, who is a professor of population and family planning at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore.

Previous research from Uganda, Kenya, and South Africa found that circumcision reduced rates of HIV infection by 50 percent to 60 percent.

In an interview with Reuters Health, Dr. Robert C. Bailey, of the University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health and a noted AIDS researcher who was not involved in the study, called the findings "unique and important."

"In eastern and southern Africa, the high prevalence of HIV infection is correlated with low rates of circumcision," he explained. "If we can get a significant proportion of men circumcised, it will drop the prevalence of HIV over the next 10 to 20 years. Women's opinions of what circumcision does in terms of sexual function are really important in driving the demand" for the procedure.

Bailey said the finding might also help counter a growing reluctance of some parents to have their infant sons circumcised. "In the US, there is currently a strong movement against circumcision, especially on the West Coast," he said. "Some parents believe that circumcision causes reduced penile sensitivity. But only a very small percentage of men say they are less satisfied after circumcision. Most men say there is no difference."

The study involved interviews with 455 women between the ages of 15 and 49 before and after their husbands underwent circumcision as part of a randomized trial of the procedure as a means of preventing the spread of HIV/AIDS.

Only 13 of the women (2.9 percent) reported lower satisfaction after their partners were circumcised. Of the remaining women, 255 (57 percent) reported no change in satisfaction, and 177 (39.8 percent) reported greater satisfaction. The differences in satisfaction were unrelated to the women's age, religion, or level of education.

The women who reported a change in satisfaction were asked to explain why.

The most common reason given for increased satisfaction was better penile hygiene. Other reasons included more frequent orgasms for the male partner; greater sexual desire of the male partner; the male partner had less trouble maintaining an erection; and the woman achieved orgasm more frequently.

The most common reason given for diminished satisfaction was that the women's sexual desire had fallen. Other reasons included lower male sexual desire; and the male partner had trouble with erections.

SOURCE: BJU International, December 2009.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (17)
STREETLAW wrote:
Well not exactly. Every time the head of the male penis thrust through the foreskin, there is a little snap to it that is no longer felt after circumcism. Further, the foreskin retains an amount of lubrication the help with that function.

The downside to being uncircumsized is that saliva can be retained under the
foreskin and can lead to a painful yeast infection. The cause of this infection is not easy to diagnose since doctors are not alway prone to consider sexual activity in making a diagnosis.

Nature seldoms provides a physical attribute without a purpose.

Women probably do not notice any difference, except perhaps during oral sex. And actually the same might be true for males as well. The foreskin of a penis has millions of nerve endings that can certainly add to the pleasure of oral stimulation (which by the way has no effect on the economy).

Dec 17, 2009 7:28pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Frank_OHara wrote:
StreetLaw wrote: “The downside to being uncircumsized is that saliva can be retained under the
foreskin and can lead to a painful yeast infection. The cause of this infection is not easy to diagnose since doctors are not alway prone to consider sexual activity in making a diagnosis.”

I would love to see a citation for this. If it were true, women would also experience these infections. Also these infections are easily diagnosed with a simple culture the same as women are diagnosed. Further, these yeast infections and all genital infections are caused by the exact same pathogens and are susceptible to the exact same medications. Why is it that these infections are easily treatable in women but apparently not in men? The truth is that there is little difference except that they are slightly easier to treat in men. The perception in our culture is that men suffer these infections and they can not be treated by any method other than circumcision. That is patently untrue.

Sexual activity has nothing to do with it. Physicians would automatically assume adult males have been engaging in sexual activity.

.

Dec 17, 2009 8:07pm EST  --  Report as abuse
TLCTugger wrote:
I really have to suspect local cultural factors in these reports of satisfaction. In Kenya the government has bought the lie that circumcision can thwart AIDS (somebody should tell them that most of the US men who have died of AIDS were circumcised at birth). So these women hear on the radio and see on billboards that circumcised men are heros helping to bring down HIV rates. Who wouldn’t be happier having sex with a hero?

It would be relevant to repeat the study years after the circumcision, when the mens mucosa had a chance to get numb. How fun is sex with a man who slams away forcefully, feeling nothing (and who has been convinced beyond all reasoning that he doesn’t need a condom)? I’m guessing it gets tiresome.

Also, it’s worth noting that a study boasting that “men had no trouble enjoying sex with women whose genitals were carved up” would be met not just with outrage, but with a criminal investigation. Why can’t we just protect boys too?

Foreskin feels REALLY good. The 80% of the world that does not circumcise males has plenty of fabulous sex happening, you can bet on that.

Dec 18, 2009 1:36am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.