U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Senate health bill alters company taxes, profits

WASHINGTON | Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:47pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Proposed changes to the U.S. Senate's pending healthcare reform bill include measures targeting industry profits and taxes, and a move to ensure health insurers spend a certain amount on medical care, according to a document released on Saturday.

The changes, proposed as a group of amendments, must be approved by the Senate before they can be added to the massive legislation that lawmakers are struggling to finish before Christmas despite delaying tactics by Republicans and a severe snowstorm in the nation's capital. Democrats appear to have pulled together the 60 votes needed to pass a final bill.

The taxes are aimed at helping pay for the healthcare overhaul aimed at expanding access to health insurance and controlling costs, President Barack Obama's top domestic priority.

Under the proposal by Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid, health insurance plans for large groups would have to spend at least 85 cents out of every dollar on medical costs. That means just 15 cents could go toward overhead and executive salaries, among other things. Small groups or individual plans would have to spend at least 80 cents on the dollar for care.

That proportion of spending, known as a "medical loss ratio," has varied widely and is eyed closely by Wall Street due to its major impact on profits.

Consumer groups and other critics have long argued that insurers aim to trim medical spending and raise customer costs in order to boost profits and please shareholders, a charge the industry has denied, saying premium increases mirror rising healthcare costs overall.

Taxes on for-profit health insurance companies such as Aetna Inc, Humana Inc and UnitedHealth Group Inc also saw significant changes that may end up being positive for the industry.

The original Senate bill taxed the health insurance industry a fixed $6.7 billion a year. But under Saturday's proposal, the industry would face just a $2 billion tax in 2011, with increases over time to $10 billion in 2017.

Reid also allowed health insurers to keep their current anti-trust exemptions, something House of Representatives Democrats did away with in their November 7 version of the bill. Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy vowed to seek removal of the protection as work on the bill continues.

A spokesman for the Association for Health Insurance Plans said the lobby group was reviewing the changes.

Obama, in his weekly address on Saturday, said other tough insurance measures in the bill would help protect patients and hold insurance companies accountable.

TANNING TAX

Additionally, the bill's revisions delayed a tax on medical device manufacturers until 2011. The total tax on the industry would be unchanged at nearly $20 billion over 10 years, according to a review by the nonpartisan congressional Joint Committee on Taxation.

Makers of medical devices want to delay the tax until 2013. Advanced Medical Technology Association spokeswoman Wanda Moebius said the lobby group would keep pressing for changes that would be "more appropriate to allow companies time to adjust their operations."

Reid's changes also removed a 5 percent tax on cosmetic surgery, wrinkle-filling injections and other similar procedures, replacing it with a 10 percent tax on indoor tanning salons estimated to raise $2.7 billion through 2019.

The "Botax" could have lowered demand for breast implants, wrinkle-fillers and other similar products made by companies such as Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp, Johnson & Johnson, and Botox-maker Allergan Inc.

Industry analysts had expressed concern that changes could also target companies that administer drug-benefit plans, such as Medco Health Solutions Inc and Express Scripts Inc. But the amendment did not address the companies, also known as pharmacy benefit managers.

Additionally, a closely watched proposal that took aim at the use of doctors' prescribing habits for marketing purposes was excluded. Such a measure had investors on edge since it would have been a major blow to IMS Health Inc, which is in the process of bought in a deal worth $4 billion.

There could be more changes before a final bill becomes law.

The first of two votes on the group of amendments is expected early on Monday before the Senate votes on the full legislation possibly as late as Christmas Eve. Additional revisions to the bill could still come as lawmakers work to combine the Senate's measure with one passed by the House.

(Reporting by Susan Heavey; Editing by Peter Cooney)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
AlitoRAF wrote:
You haven’t seen anything yet. This insult to the American people will result in all sorts of problems. Oh well, we’ll have to get used to life in the good old USSA.

Dec 19, 2009 12:31pm EST  --  Report as abuse
LOSTME wrote:
THIS IS ROBBERY OF OUR HUMAN RIGHTS I’VE DEID 7 TIMES, LIFE’S ABOUT LIVING NOT GOVERMENTAL CLAUSES, WE NEED “CHANGE”

Dec 19, 2009 8:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
JPJC wrote:
Congress is way over stepping their capabilities at the expense of tax payers. Previous successes like Fannie, Freddie, post office, Amtrack and a host of others constitute a resume of incompetence and greed. Can’t wait for 2010 elections to end the maddness!

Dec 19, 2009 10:02pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.