UPDATE 3-Novo Nordisk says FDA's Victoza feedback delayed

Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:05am EST

* FDA's formal feedback on Victoza delayed beyond year-end

* Company says expects feedback within weeks

* Plans update on Feb 2 if feedback not received earlier

* Shares down 0.5 pct (Adds analyst quotes; updates share price)

COPENHAGEN, Dec 30 (Reuters) - Danish drugmaker Novo Nordisk (NOVOb.CO) said on Wednesday that formal feedback from U.S. regulators on its Victoza diabetes drug has been delayed beyond year-end but is expected "within weeks".

Victoza, also known as liraglutide, was approved in Europe in July, but repeated delays in receiving approval for the all-important U.S. market have cast a shadow over Novo Nordisk this year.

Some analysts had expected news from the FDA by year-end, but Novo Nordisk's shares dipped only modestly on the delay.

"Formal feedback from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding liraglutide, a once-daily human GLP-1 analogue, is expected within weeks," Novo Nordisk said in a statement. "Novo Nordisk continues the constructive dialogue with the FDA regarding the regulatory process for liraglutide."

Novo Nordisk will give an update on the regulatory process with its financial results for 2009 on Feb. 2, if formal FDA feedback is not received before then, the company said.

Novo Nordisk shares were off 0.5 percent at 332.25 crowns by 1351 GMT, just slightly weaker than a 0.4 percent drop in the DJ Stoxx European healthcare index .SXDP.

Jefferies analysts said in a note to clients that they had not expected the FDA to complete the regulatory process by year-end and that the stock is a buying opportunity near-term on possible Victoza setbacks as other parts of Novo Nordisk's business are undervalued.

"We would advise caution until this issue is crystallised for Novo Nordisk/Victoza, but would be strong buyers on any major delays or negative opinion if the shares pull back significantly (...)," the Jefferies International note said.

Jyske Bank analyst Frank Horning Andersen also said the delay was insignificant. "We still expect a launch (in the United States) by the end of 2010," he said.

"It is a minor delay. In principle, it is entirely unimportant whether we get a decision on January 15 or December 30," Andersen said.

Novo Nordisk's spokesman Mike Rulis said the company had been "a bit too optimistic" about the timing of the FDA's feedback, but he played down the significance of the delay.

"We have an ongoing dialogue, and nothing new or sensational has occurred during this dialogue, so we are convinced that this is merely an expression that the process of approval is just taking longer than we originally anticipated," Rulis said. Rulis said that only about half of applications are approved by the FDA within 24 months. Novo filed its application for Victoza in May 2008, 19 months ago.

Victoza is a rival to Eli Lilly's (LLY.N) and Amylin Pharmaceuticals' (AMLN.O) Byetta treatment, and Novo Nordisk has said it has potential to be a blockbuster drug, meaning annual sales of more than $1 billion.

Victoza and Byetta belong to the GLP-1 class of drugs that stimulate insulin release when glucose levels grow too high.

Other GLP-1 drugs are also being developed by rival drugmakers, such as GlaxoSmithKline Plc (GSK.L) and Roche Holding AG (ROG.VX). (Reporting by John Acher and Karin Jensen; Additional reporting by Anna Ringstrom and Ole Mikkelsen; Editing by Hans Peters)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
w.gates wrote:
If Novo Nordisk and Victoza doesn’t work out, consider Xoma. I’m an Xoma shareholder. I made a verifiable list of facts that suggest the stock is grossly undervalued.

1. TAE technology. Makes antibodies many times more powerful and removes residual toxicity. Pure cash to bottom line. Made Xoma a profitable bio this year.
2. Xoma052 best in class for Type II diabetes. Phase II trial expanded to 4 sites.
3. Xoma052 in Type I Diabetes P2
4. 052 for Cardio P2.
5. Xoma3ab for possible 300 to 500 million stockpiling contract.
6. Partnered multiple drugs with Novartis. HCD122 in phase II. Other undisclosed.
7. Partnered multiple undisclosed drugs with Merck.
8. Partnered multiple undisclosed drugs with Takeda.
9. Interest in undisclosed drugs from more than 50 companies with BCE licenses. Cimzia currently paying royalties.
10. Xoma is debt free except for 13 million held against interest in HCD122.
11. Xoma should have between 50 and 60 million in the bank since they had 27 at end of 3rd Q. and got 33 million from licenses in Oct.
12. Stock is trading at about 1.1 times sales. Peer average is 16.
13. Gov. contract generating more than 20 million next year.
14. Gov. contracted Xoma to work on Swine Flu, Bird Flu, and SARS.
15. Xoma has backlog of contracts with Novartis, Merck and Takeda valued in excess of 500 million.
16. Xoma just announced a multiple antibody delivery technology that will be generating revenues next year.
17. Xoma has been hiring VP’s and numerous scientists lately.
18. Analysts have buys on stock with near term price of 2.40
19. 09 Revenue will be about 120 million which is the current Market Cap.
20. Hudson Bay bought 12 million shares recently at $1.15 .
21. Azimuth bought 40 million shares at between 1.25 and .75
22. Insiders bought shares higher than the current price also.
23. Opebacan host vs. graft phase II ended last month. Possible radiation sickness use from this data and the burn phase II trial.
24. Xoma052 RA phase II trial ended in Nov.
W.Gates

Dec 30, 2009 11:50am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.