U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Iraq: U.S. Blackwater case dismissal "unacceptable"

Related Topics

1 of 2. Former Blackwater Worldwide security guard Dustin Hard arrives with lawyer David Schertler at the U.S. District Court before surrendering to authorities in Salt Lake City, Utah, in this December 8, 2008 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Chris Detrick/Files

BAGHDAD | Fri Jan 1, 2010 3:34pm EST

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq expressed anger on Friday with a U.S. federal court ruling that threw out all charges against five Blackwater Worldwide security guards accused of gunning down Iraqi civilians in 2007.

The ruling was "unjust and unacceptable" Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said in a statement, adding that Iraq had started to take steps to sue the private security company, now known as Xe Services.

A federal judge threw out the charges against the guards accused of killing 14 Iraqi civilians in 2007, saying the U.S. government had recklessly violated the defendants' constitutional rights.

Dabbagh called for the ruling to be appealed against. He gave no details on how or where Iraq would take legal action.

The Baghdad shooting strained U.S.-Iraqi relations and became a symbol for many Iraqis of foreign disregard for local life.

"The Iraqi government regrets and is disappointed by the U.S. court's decision," Dabbagh said by telephone.

After the 2003 invasion, private guards protecting U.S. personnel enjoyed immunity from prosecution in Iraqi courts, but that ended with a bilateral pact that took effect in 2009.

The five guards were charged in a U.S. federal court a year ago with 14 counts of manslaughter, 20 counts of attempt to commit manslaughter and one weapons violation count.

General Ray Odierno, commander of U.S. troops in Iraq, echoed the Iraqi government's displeasure.

"Of course we're upset when we believe that people might have caused a crime and they are not held accountable," he told reporters in Baghdad, adding the dismissal might create a backlash against other security firms operating in Iraq.

The shooting happened as a heavily armed Blackwater convoy escorted U.S. officials in downtown Baghdad on September 16, 2007.

The guards, U.S. military veterans, said they heard a nearby explosion and gunfire, and began shooting across a crowded intersection in self-defense.

One Iraqi at the scene, whose young son was killed in the incident, said the guards indiscriminately rained gunfire on cars at the intersection near the convoy.

Mohammed Usama, the son of a man killed in the incident, said he was surprised at the U.S. judge's verdict.

A sixth Blackwater guard had earlier pleaded guilty to charges of voluntary manslaughter and attempt to commit manslaughter, and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors.

The Justice Department said it was disappointed by the judge's action. "We're in the process of reviewing the opinion and considering our options," Dean Boyd, a department spokesman, said in response to a question about whether the government would appeal.

(Reporting by Mohammed Abbas, Jim Loney, Muhanad Mohammed and Khalid al-Ansary, writing by Mohammed Abbas: Editing by Dominic Evans)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (30)
BOBBY99 wrote:
Blackwater is a rogue corporation and its employees are chosen to be of the same swampwater mind.

I have lived in North Carolina swamp latitudes, and picking fishing at swampwater level there or in Texas is easy: bigots are eager to jump at gun toter’s bait.

Not prosecuting these happy perpetrators should shame any law enforcement group in the world. And it has.

The corporate charter should have been revoked, and corporate officers blocked from from future managing. Yet, under the administration past, they ascended to their wanton profiting from undisciplined wild west gunslinging.

If the media at large had been doing its job since 2000, this and other obvious abuses would have been publicly known and acted upon. But Blackwater just changes its name and continues to collect American money for gunslinging bigotry.

Jan 01, 2010 11:11am EST  --  Report as abuse
t-add wrote:
There is no doubt in my mind…I too would have shot first and asked questions later. I value my life.

Jan 01, 2010 2:15pm EST  --  Report as abuse
arttie wrote:
I believe that the evidence against these men and their employers is overwhelming. I realize safeguards are built in to our legal system to protect the possibly innocent person. This is outrageous though! How can our judicial system ignore the fact that these men are guilty?

I feel terrible sadness for the families of those slain and understand the statement that there is nothing that can be done with the way US laws are used to protect the guilty.

I think that the Iraqi government should proceed diligently to obtain prosecution of these men and their employers in a World Court setting. Possibly the correct verdict will be achieved and restitution paid to the families.

It’s really no wonder why so many are fighting against us, given the way we apply our own laws.

I have a grandson in Iraq right now and am very proud of his decision to protect our freedoms. I am not proud that he will be called upon to possibly surrender his life for instances such as this which shame all Americans.

Jan 01, 2010 2:19pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.