Sponsored Links

Rate hikes not best way to burst bubbles: Bernanke

1 of 2. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke speaks during a presentation at the American Economic Association in Atlanta, Georgia, January 3, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Tami Chappell

ATLANTA | Sun Jan 3, 2010 1:08pm EST

ATLANTA (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said on Sunday that vigorous financial regulation would have been the best way to restrain the housing bubble that helped cause the deep recession, but said policy makers can no longer rule out monetary policy to curb the buildup of risk.

In a speech defending the Fed's rock-bottom interest rates in the early 2000s, a policy many say fueled a runaway housing boom that triggered a devastating crisis when it went bust, Bernanke said regulatory and supervisory actions, rather than rate hikes, would have been more effective ways to check the run-up in house prices.

Bernanke and the Fed face sharp criticism over actions leading up to the crisis. Bernanke's renomination as Fed chairman faces an unusual degree of opposition, and the Fed's responsibilities stand to be curtailed if congressional proposals become law.

Bernanke said, however, in a speech to the American Economic Association, that policy makers can no longer eliminate rate increases from their arsenal to prevent future crises.

"If adequate reforms are not made, or if they are made but prove insufficient to prevent dangerous buildups of financial risks, we must remain open to using monetary policy as a supplemental tool for addressing those risks," he said.

Bernanke conceded that efforts by the Fed and other regulators beginning in 2005 came too late or were insufficient to slow the housing bubble.

"The lesson I take from this experience is not that financial regulations are ineffective for controlling emerging risks, but that their execution must be better and smarter," he said.

The U.S. Senate is poised to begin debate over financial rules reforms that would peel away the Fed's authority for regulating large financial firms. The U.S. central bank would be charged instead with focusing on monetary policy.

Bernanke and other Fed officials have argued that such a change would hurt the Fed and oversight of the system in general by removing a crucial monitor from the pulse of the financial system.

Analyzing the Fed's decisions to keep rates low for an extended period in the early 2000s, the Fed chairman argued that those policies were a response to the worry about a possible deflationary spiral that hobbled the Japanese economy through much of the previous decade.

If the Fed followed some rules of thumb for setting interest rates, it might have been raising rates well into 2008, when the recession and the financial crisis were at or near their peaks, he said. The Fed's actions in slashing rates to near zero and pumping hundreds of billions of dollars into the financial system are credited with helping avoid an even more disastrous breakdown.

Bernanke pointed to adjustable-rate mortgages and overconfidence that house prices would continue to rise as the main culprits behind the catastrophic housing bubble.

(Editing by Padraic Cassidy)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
voomies wrote:
US housing is set to take a turn for the worse as strategic foreclosures, currently 25% of all foreclosures, accelerate. Why stay in a mortgage when your neighbors are renting at 1/3 the cost of your monthly mortgage. Read about a wild California foreclosure story at http://storyburn.com

Jan 03, 2010 4:24pm EST  --  Report as abuse
station3gc wrote:
The Fed’s actions in slashing rates to near zero and pumping hundreds of billions of dollars into the financial system are credited with helping avoid an even more disastrous breakdown.

Seriously doubtful…. The finality has yet come home to roost. Give it a few more months.

Audit the fed, GS, Citi, Wells, BofA, and actually congress as well. I think we need a bunch of us old retired geezers to earn our social security in the assistance of the audit. I am no accountant, but my math is damn good.

Jan 03, 2010 8:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
noles2u wrote:
I doubt that higher rates would have stopped the unethical mortgage brokers. All they wanted to do was close the loan, bundle it so its identity was lost and pass it off to other “greedies”. Congress should seriously consider opening up IRS audit results on publicly traded companies. Why should anything be private with a public company?

Jan 04, 2010 7:01am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.