Clinton ties U.S. security to better aid delivery

WASHINGTON Wed Jan 6, 2010 3:51pm EST

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks to the press during a joint press conference with Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad Bin Jassim Jabr Al-Thani following their bilateral meeting at the State Department in Washington, January 4, 2010. REUTERS/Jason Reed

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks to the press during a joint press conference with Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad Bin Jassim Jabr Al-Thani following their bilateral meeting at the State Department in Washington, January 4, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed


Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. security depends on a new approach to international aid, so Washington must consult more and dictate less as it dispenses billions of dollars in assistance, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Wednesday.

"In the past we have sometimes dictated solutions from afar, often missing our mark on the ground," Clinton said in a speech. "Our new approach is to work in partnership with developing countries."

Clinton's speech at a Washington think-tank marked the Obama administration's latest effort to persuade the U.S. public that development aid is a foreign policy tool as important as defense and diplomacy.

But while the U.S. remains the world's largest individual aid donor -- with almost $27 billion disbursed in 2008 -- critics worry the administration may be slow to follow through on promises to boost funding and improve work at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the main U.S. government aid organization.

Security moved back to the top Washington's agenda this week as President Barack Obama came under political fire after a failed Christmas Day bomb attack on a U.S.-bound airliner and new al Qaeda threats against U.S. interests in Yemen.

Clinton said aid efforts in places such as Afghanistan and Yemen -- where she conceded the odds of success were long -- were critical components of security strategy.

"We cannot stop terrorism or defeat the ideologies of violent extremism when hundreds of millions of young people see a future with no jobs, no hope, and no way ever to catch up to the developed world," she said.


Both Clinton and Obama have in recent months sketched out new priorities for U.S. foreign policy, including a pragmatic approach to human rights in countries such as China and Obama's defense of "just wars" in his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize in December.

But Clinton left no doubt on Wednesday that international assistance -- and a new, higher profile for USAID under newly appointed administrator Rajiv Shah -- would be central to Washington's new approach.

"Development was once the province of humanitarians, charities, and governments looking to gain allies in global struggles. Today it is a strategic, economic, and moral imperative," she said.

Clinton said the United States would put new emphasis on partnership, coordination with other aid donors and focus on key areas such as health, agriculture, security, education and governance in hopes of maximizing returns.

U.S. aid programs will also focus on programs to assist women and girls -- a key area of interest for Clinton, who lost her bid in 2008 to become the first woman elected president of the United States.

"Women and girls are one of the world's greatest untapped resources and a terrific return on investment," Clinton said, noting that in many communities women take the lead in growing food, caring for the sick and raising the next generation.

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
Lal6191 wrote:
It’s interesting to note that Secretary Clinton’s speech was given at a “think-tank” that went nameless. Are we to assume that the “think-tank” endorsed the contents of her speech or is it merely a coincidence?

If we dictate less, does that mean that the money provided has no strings attached and, if so, how does one account for the money? Without additional information, this sounds like just another of President Obama’s give-aways to convince others to like us – rather naive and unprofessional for the United States.

Jan 06, 2010 5:47pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

A tourist takes a plunge as she swims at Ngapali Beach, a popular tourist site, in the Thandwe township of the Rakhine state, October 6, 2013. Picture taken October 6, 2013. REUTERS/Soe Zeya Tun (MYANMAR - Tags: SOCIETY) - RTR3FOI0

Where do you want to go?

We look at when to take trips, budget considerations and the popularity of multigenerational family travel.   Video