UPDATE 2-Gay marriage bill defeated in NJ Senate

Thu Jan 7, 2010 5:54pm EST

(Updates with reaction)

By Jon Hurdle

TRENTON, N.J. Jan 7 (Reuters) - New Jersey's state Senate defeated a bill to legalize same-sex marriage on Thursday, a move that likely stalls the proposal in the legislature but puts it back in the hands of the courts.

The Senate, after an afternoon of debate, voted 20 to 14 against the bill. Backers had hoped to get it approved and signed into law by Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine, a supporter, who leaves office on Jan. 19.

Incoming Republican Governor Chris Christie had said he would veto the measure. Now, with the Senate defeat, any such proposal may likely lie dormant in the legislature as long as Christie holds office.

"This is an example of how our country's majority knows that we should not have to change the rules for a minority of people as long as we have protected their rights through civil unions," said Joseph McMullen, a member of the New Jersey Family Policy Council, who welcomed the Senate vote.

New Jersey has a same-sex civil union law designed to give gay couples the same legal rights as heterosexual couples. Gay-marriage supporters say, however, that civil unions are inadequate.

"Children deserve the rights of natural parents, and they should not be denied them because of some people's sexual desires," McMullen added.

Garden State Equality, the leading advocacy group for gay marriage in New Jersey, condemned the vote, saying the Senate "defaulted on its constitutional obligation" to provide equal protection to same-sex couples.

Gay-marriage supporters said they will take the issue back to the state courts.

New Jersey's Supreme Court ruled in 2006 that same-sex couples have equal rights under the law and backed civil unions but stopped short of endorsing gay marriage. Instead, the court said the marriage issue should be decided by the legislature.

State Sen. Raymond Lesniak, a Democrat and chief sponsor of the failed bill, said he was sure it would be a "slam dunk" in favor of gay marriage should the issue again go before the state Supreme Court.

"I'm certain that we will win that," he said.

Political observers have said Christie's victory over Corzine, a liberal Democrat, in November made some lawmakers wary of supporting the controversial gay marriage bill.

Iowa, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Vermont have legalized same sex marriage. Another 40 states have specific laws banning it.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
ladyprirate wrote:
Wow I love this quote; “This is an example of how our country’s majority knows that we should not have to change the rules for a minority of people as long as we have protected their rights through civil unions,” said Joseph McMullen. First off civil unions do not provide all of the same benefits that marriage does. Secondly separate is not equal. I thought we learned that back in the 60’s when blacks were separate from the white. How did that work out? Everyone is entitled to what they morally agree with. That is the beauty of living in America. The land of the free. The state and federal governments job is to make sure that everyone is treated equally and fairly. Clearly this did not happen. What they are supposed to do is put their personal beliefs aside and protect others basic civil rights. Again they failed.

Jan 07, 2010 7:51pm EST  --  Report as abuse
akcoins wrote:
This is not what I served my country for. To have a majority deny people the same rights that they have to a minority.

Jan 07, 2010 8:54pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.