U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Calorie postings trim Starbucks calorie consumption

Related Topics

A woman walks past a Starbucks store in Somerville, Massachusetts April 24, 2008. REUTERS/Brian Snyder

A woman walks past a Starbucks store in Somerville, Massachusetts April 24, 2008.

Credit: Reuters/Brian Snyder

NEW YORK | Thu Jan 7, 2010 10:42am EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York City law requiring restaurants to post the calories of their menu items led Starbucks customers to consume 6 percent fewer calories per transaction, a Stanford University study found.

For people who averaged more than 250 calories per purchase, calorie consumption fell by a more dramatic 26 percent, the study said.

Calories per transaction fell on average to 232 from 247, the study found. The impact was almost entirely on food choices, not beverages, said the authors, who persuaded Starbucks to provide them with sales data enabling them to observe every transaction from January 2008 to February 2009.

"There is no impact on Starbucks profit on average, and for the subset of stores located close to their competitor Dunkin' Donuts, the effect of calorie posting is actually to increase Starbucks revenue," said the study dated January 2010.

With U.S. obesity rates on the rise, New York required chain restaurants to post calorie counts in 2008. Several other states have followed and there is legislation before the U.S. Congress, said the study by researchers Bryan Bollinger, Phillip Leslie and Alan Sorensen.

U.S. obesity rates rose to 26.6 percent in 2008 from 15.9 percent in 1995, according to a 2009 study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Starbucks had no immediate comment Wednesday.

(Reporting by Daniel Trotta; Editing by Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Hoyka wrote:
This shows you how stupid and ignorant so many people are. They only need to buy a little calorie-counting booklet for about 3 bucks in which most of the (fast) food we consume is listed, showing calories, fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, etc. Then they would be in the know, and consume less calories.

Jan 07, 2010 12:00pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Breezy wrote:
Hey, How neat that is! Hope that becomes a national trend – having calories posted gives us all a quick reminder of the value of our choices re the size of our waistlines! And, we don’t have to carry a “little book” to find out – especially when looking at yummy new additions to menus & drink offerings. Terrific!

Jan 07, 2010 1:01pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.