Obama to announce TARP fee on banks on Thursday

WASHINGTON Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:56am EST

President Barack Obama walks at the White House in Washington January 12, 2010. REUTERS/Larry Downing

President Barack Obama walks at the White House in Washington January 12, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama will announce plans on Thursday to raise up to $120 billion from major U.S. financial firms to cover expected losses from a taxpayer-funded bank bailout, a senior administration official said on Tuesday.

Obama's announcement will come as U.S. unemployment is stuck in double digits and public anger is growing over big bonuses that some financial firms are poised to resume paying, barely a year after the height of the global financial crisis that made the bailout necessary.

The Obama administration official said the amount of money raised from the fees would not exceed $120 billion since this was the higher end of conservative estimates of the cost of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

U.S. Treasury officials expect TARP losses to be much lower than that sum, and over the course of years the fee will pay back any costs of the $700 billion taxpayer bailout, the administration official said.

TARP was created by President George W. Bush's administration to shore up the financial system during the financial meltdown, which plunged the United States into the worst recession in 70 years and has pushed unemployment to 10 percent.

The proposal of a TARP fee has been under discussion since August and Obama felt it was important to find ways to make sure taxpayers got all the money back sooner than was required under the law, the administration official said.

A number of big U.S. banks have already repaid the capital they received under TARP. The legislation that created TARP calls for taxpayer losses to be recouped by 2013.

A financial industry source in Washington told Reuters that many options on how to structure such a fee were being discussed, including basing it on the amount of a financial firm's liabilities.

The source, speaking anonymously because the fee has not officially been proposed, said government officials are also discussing exempting automakers and insurer American International Group from the fee, even though these companies are expected to represent a large chunk of the bailout losses.

(Additional reporting by Karey Wutkowski; editing by Chris Wilson)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
workinglate wrote:
Great – this should make banking cheaper for everyone once the banks figure out how to pass the tax onto their customers! What a way to help the economy recover – increase the costs to the consumer. TARP – the gift the keeps on taking.

Jan 13, 2010 2:29am EST  --  Report as abuse
CTGuy wrote:
Nothing more than a TAX, which Obama promised not to raise. Banks won’t actually PAY any such fees; rather, they’ll just pass the costs on to you and me. Dems don’t understand that businesses don’t PAY taxes; they merely COLLECT them, passing the costs on to their customers.

Jan 13, 2010 4:07am EST  --  Report as abuse
toeser wrote:
Obama has to be the most economically clueless President of my lifetime. Worse, he governs from an ideology that is patently anti-capitalism. I wonder if he intends to apply this new massive tax to the financial institutions that did not want TARP? If you remember, some strong firms were forced to take the money. Yet AIG, which was used as a funnel to take care of Goldman Sachs, would be left off the hook. He will probably wreck some banks with his new tax, and then give them to the UAW. I don’t know if I can stand three more years of Chicago Mafia politics.

Jan 13, 2010 8:35am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.