U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Q+A: How will Google case impact foreign investors in China?

SHANGHAI | Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:53am EST

SHANGHAI (Reuters) - U.S. Internet giant Google has threatened to shut its China operations after cyber attacks emanating from the country, in response to which Beijing defended its censorship policies.

The case has prompted concern among the foreign investor community and public calls from U.S. officials for China to safeguard the business environment there, raising questions about the difficulty and risks of doing business in the world's third-largest economy.

WHAT IS THE MOST IMMEDIATE IMPACT FOR OTHER FIRMS?

Heightened awareness of the potential damage from cyber attacks, not just for technology companies.

Google said its investigation into the attack on it in mid-December showed at least 20 other large companies in fields ranging from finance to chemicals were also hit.

That raises the bar in foreign companies' battle against one of their long-standing complaints about doing business in China -- intellectual property (IP) theft -- and could prompt them to more vigorously defend their own IP.

Reflecting the alarm created by increased threats to companies' intellectual property, Brenda Foster, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai, called the attack against Google and other firms a matter of "extreme concern."

Stronger awareness of the prospect of hackers in China or elsewhere stealing software code, product designs or other trade secrets also means some firms that do not operate in China could see themselves as more at risk than they previously thought.

That could help drive demand for the services of security companies such as McAfee Inc, Symantec Corp and Trend Micro, some analysts say.

WILL FOREIGN COMPANIES BE SCARED OFF?

Beijing's renewed defense of censorship could make companies involved in the Internet industry and new media more cautious about the content and services they provide, even if they do not pull out of the country.

A crackdown on online and mobile content was already seen as potentially stunting the prospects of that sector, which could hit big developers such as Electronic Arts and Activision Blizzard.

For other firms, a big worry will probably be whether the issue turns into a trade conflict with the United States and other countries that might prompt Beijing to retaliate quietly by moving more slowly -- or even backpedaling -- on other reforms.

Many other industries, from financial services and express delivery to wind power and autos, are hoping for reforms that would give them freer access to the Chinese market.

The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China said in its annual position paper in September that Beijing was backsliding on reforms, with rising government intervention in industrial policy and restrictions on foreign investment making China less and less attractive to European companies.

WHAT OTHER RISKS LOOM?

Even for companies that do not face serious barriers to entry, or that only sell their products in the country rather than making them there, serious concerns over transparency and the rule of law remain.

That was brought into focus by the detention of a senior executive at Rio Tinto and three of his subordinates last July on spying allegations, a case that was sent to prosecutors this week.

Those detentions rekindled awareness about the risk of doing business in China, which lacks an independent judiciary.

However, given the big investments many companies have made in China and the fact that sales there are an increasing source of profits for many firms now that demand in Western markets has softened, most will likely continue to prod Beijing for improvements in those areas but live with the consequences in any case.

(Reporting by Jason Subler; Editing by Jacqueline Wong and Muralikumar Anantharaman)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Vincent9 wrote:
==========================================
Google said its investigation into the attack on it in mid-December showed at least 20 other large companies in fields ranging from finance to chemicals were also hit.
==========================================
Sound very fishy to me.
Since when did Google start looking out for somebody else’s web servers ?

Jan 14, 2010 10:30am EST  --  Report as abuse
worsted wrote:
There’s nothing fishy about it.

These kinds of attacks leave lots of traces across many servers, due to the routed nature of the Internet. So Google has access to lots of data it can inspect or get voluntarily from other companies. It can coordinate with other companies and US Government bodies like the FBI to figure out what happened.

Jan 14, 2010 11:30am EST  --  Report as abuse
evanlabbe wrote:
I agree, not fishy.
Google is a major player everywhere, and cares deeply about its largest money-base, the internet.
The greater internet’s security is a key to Google’s continued vision of safe browsing. People will stop using Google if its websites become unsafe, which will cause them to blame google, and stop using it. Likewise, to keep that in check, Google scans most every site it lists, and blacklists the sites that are not safe, reducing their search results. Having more internet security means more search results, which equates to larger ad dollars.
More toward that effort, Google has purchased a major SPAM filter system, Postini.com. Their reach into the web is great.
Routing tables, as were mentioned above this post, usually store data for quite some time. This data can (usually) be traced back to a particular user’s internet connection; or at least very close.

Jan 14, 2010 12:58pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.