The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

Obama chides banks' "audacity" for fighting fee

Related Topics

U.S. President Barack Obama attends the House Democratic Caucus retreat on Capitol Hill in Washington January 14, 2010. REUTERS/Larry Downing

U.S. President Barack Obama attends the House Democratic Caucus retreat on Capitol Hill in Washington January 14, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

WASHINGTON | Sat Jan 16, 2010 6:04am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama on Saturday slammed Wall Street's "audacity" for fighting a bailout fee he wants to slap on financial firms and said his Republican opponents had sided with big banks.

With Obama's popularity hovering around 50 percent and congressional elections in November, the White House wants to cast itself alongside ordinary Americans while branding Republicans as the party for the rich.

"Like clockwork, the banks and politicians who curry their favor are already trying to stop this fee from going into effect," Obama said in his weekly radio and Internet address.

"We're not going to let Wall Street take the money and run. We're going to pass this fee into law," Obama vowed after proposing a levy to raise up to $117 billion over the next 10 years to recoup projected losses on a taxpayer bank bailout.

A number of the banks have already repaid capital they received under the $700 billion bailout, called the Troubled Asset Relief Program, which was conceived in 2008 by Obama's predecessor, Republican George W Bush.

They complain they are being penalized unfairly for losses mainly run up by U.S. automakers and insurer American International Group, which was rescued in September 2008. Some Republicans warned the fee would be dumped on customers.

"President Obama's plans to institute a 'financial crisis responsibility fee' to recoup the bailout funds from major banks is nothing more than another tax on the American public," said Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele.

Tapping into public rage over Wall Street excess, Obama said the money owed taxpayers paled beside the riches banks plan to pay themselves after the government rescued financial markets in 2008 and early 2009.

"If the big financial firms can afford massive bonuses, they can afford to pay back the American people. Those who oppose this fee have also had the audacity to suggest that it is somehow unfair," he said.

"The very same firms reaping billions of dollars in profits, and reportedly handing out more money in bonuses and compensation than ever before in history, are now pleading poverty. It's a sight to see."

Linking the fee with his administration's goal of financial regulatory reform that it says is needed to prevent a repeat of the crisis, Democrat Obama also sought to channel public anger over the bailout toward the Republican Party.

"The industry has even joined forces with the opposition party to launch a massive lobbying campaign against common-sense rules to protect consumers and prevent another crisis," he said.

(Reporting by Alister Bull; Editing by Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (15)
hapasan wrote:
I love when people who are stinking rich complain about things being unfair. I would say all of the rules surrounding who gets credit, and how much that credit costs is unfair. Those same banks complaining about what is fair also charge fees for just about anything they can think of, and raise them whenever they want to. If they were showing that they are interested in anything besides lining their own profits, maybe they would have a point. But they charge all these ridiculous fees and use them for bonuses. Not to improve their services, or help get the economy moving by providing credit. I’m thinking I’m going to move all my money into a Credit Union, as they seem to run their businesses more efficiently, sanely, and offer better service with less fees.

Jan 16, 2010 1:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
wrote:
Banks charge fees because people are willing to pay the. Don’t like it, find another bank. That’s called a free market economy. This article made me laugh. Was Obama surprised at the push-back he received? Did he really expect that banks will just accept this obvious attempt to screw them in the @$$??? All commies are alike, can’t see past their noses.

Jan 16, 2010 1:59pm EST  --  Report as abuse
sarum wrote:
Can you explain how it is fair if two individuals have the exact same job description, work the exact same hours, make exactly the same compensation and have the same health coverage and yet the one employee in a union does not have to pay taxes but the other does. Second, why is Obama demonizing those banks that were told they must take the bailout and then paid every penny back plus 17% interest to the governmment, and those banks that never took a penny period. Shouldn’t he focus his ire on those banks that haven’t paid us back?Brian

Jan 16, 2010 2:18pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.