The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

Q+A: How will Google case impact foreign investors in China?

Related Topics

SHANGHAI | Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:49am EST

SHANGHAI (Reuters) - U.S. Internet giant Google has threatened to shut its China operations after cyber attacks emanating from the country, in response to which Beijing defended its censorship policies.

The case has prompted concern among foreign investors and public calls from U.S. officials for China to safeguard the business environment there, raising questions about the difficulty and risks of doing business in the world's third-largest economy.

WHAT IS THE MOST IMMEDIATE IMPACT FOR OTHER FIRMS?

Heightened awareness of the potential damage from cyber-attacks -- and not just for technology companies.

Google said its investigation into the attack on it in mid-December showed at least 20 other large companies in fields ranging from finance to chemicals were also hit.

That raises the bar in the battle against a long-standing complaint about doing business in China -- intellectual property (IP) theft -- and could prompt them to more vigorously defend their own IP.

Reflecting the alarm created by increased threats to intellectual property, Brenda Foster, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai, called the attack against Google and other firms a matter of "extreme concern."

Stronger awareness of the prospect of hackers in China or elsewhere stealing software code, product designs or other trade secrets also means some firms that do not operate in China could see themselves as more at risk than they previously thought.

That could help drive demand for the services of security companies such as McAfee Inc, Symantec Corp and Trend Micro, some analysts say.

For Chinese firms with large foreign stakeholders, such as Alibaba Group, there is the risk of a misalignment of interests.

On Saturday, Chinese e-commerce firm Alibaba Group called Yahoo Inc statements supporting Google as "reckless." Yahoo owns a 40 percent stake in Alibaba group.

In China, companies tread carefully on topics sensitive to the Chinese government. Firms like Baidu Inc, NetEase.com and Sina tend to self-censor without much prodding from the government.

WILL FOREIGN COMPANIES BE SCARED OFF?

Beijing's renewed defense of censorship could make companies involved in the Internet industry and new media more cautious about the content and services they provide, even if they do not pull out of the country.

Microsoft Corp's Chief Executive Steve Ballmer said last Thursday it had no intention of leaving China where it has high hopes for its Bing search engine.

A crackdown on online and mobile content was already seen as potentially stunting the prospects of that sector, which could hit big developers such as Electronic Arts and Activision Blizzard.

For other firms, a big worry will probably be whether the issue turns into a trade conflict with the United States and other countries that might prompt Beijing to retaliate quietly by moving more slowly -- or even backpedaling -- on other reforms.

Many other industries, from financial services and express delivery to wind power and autos, are hoping for reforms that would give them freer access to the Chinese market.

The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China said in its annual position paper in September that Beijing was backsliding on reforms, with rising government intervention in industrial policy and restrictions on foreign investment making China less and less attractive to European companies.

WHAT OTHER RISKS LOOM?

Even for companies that do not face serious barriers to entry, or that only sell their products in the country rather than making them there, serious concerns over transparency and the rule of law remain.

That was brought into focus by the detention of a senior executive at Rio Tinto and three of his subordinates last July on spying allegations, a case that was sent to prosecutors this week.

Those detentions rekindled awareness about the risk of doing business in China, which lacks an independent judiciary.

However, given the big investments many companies have made in China and the fact that sales there are an increasing source of profits for many firms now that demand in Western markets has softened, most will likely continue to prod Beijing for improvements in those areas but live with the consequences in any case.

(Additional reporting by Melanie Lee; Editing by Jacqueline Wong and Muralikumar Anantharaman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Taiwanese wrote:
Google’s case clearly illustrates the dangers of angering officials in the PRC government, since this was an outright attack from the government. As the power of the Party state grows, it will only become more restrictive toward foreign enterprises. Google’s position was precarious because it was completely at the mercy of a rapidly expanding censorship bureaucracy, but there’s no reason to think the market will get any better as the communist party consolidates its power and becomes more aggressive in its foreign policy (which is closely connected to foreign companies working in China).

Also, too little of Google.cn coverage in the news has focused on the issue of companies’ responsibility toward customer privacy agreements and abiding by international human rights laws. Some have accused Google of being short-sighted, but in this case they have shown great foresight in trying to avoid participating in PRC’s attacks on human rights supporters and democracy activists.

Jan 17, 2010 4:40am EST  --  Report as abuse
That’s Chinese sense of doing things … facking things (even in science) and bullying other non-chinese … Keep dreaming of the mutual benefits, Western guys !!! Or begging China in order to get out of financial crisis … Bravo Google.

Jan 17, 2010 10:19pm EST  --  Report as abuse
bravo google

Jan 17, 2010 10:20pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.