Turnout heavy in crucial Massachusetts Senate poll

Related Topics

1 of 5. Democratic candidate for the Senate Martha Coakley greets supporters outside the polling station where she cast her ballot in the special election to fill the Senate seat of the late Edward Kennedy in Medford, Massachusetts, January 19, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Brian Snyder

BOSTON | Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:49pm EST

BOSTON (Reuters) - Massachusetts voters streamed to the polls on Tuesday in a close election for a new U.S. senator that could derail Democrats' dominance in Washington and scuttle President Barack Obama's sweeping healthcare reform.

What looked likely weeks ago to be an easy Democratic victory has turned into a desperate scramble after a surge by the Republican, affable state Senator Scott Brown, over the past few weeks.

Latest opinion polls suggest Brown could defeat state Attorney General Martha Coakley, and take away the Democrats' 60-vote supermajority in Congress, which enables them to overcome Republican procedural roadblocks. Voter worries about the economy and healthcare reform have helped Brown.

In Washington, Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs said the president does not believe healthcare reform will fail if Coakley loses. But Obama is "both surprised and frustrated" and "not pleased" by the closeness of the Massachusetts race, Gibbs said.

Polls will stay open until 8 p.m. EST (0100 GMT on Wednesday). Given the expected close vote, results could take a few hours to emerge after polls close.

Reflecting Wall Street's expectations for healthcare reform, investors drove health insurance and drug company shares higher, betting a Brown victory would at least slow Obama's healthcare plans.

Hospital companies, which may gain more insured customers under health reform, saw their shares slump.

"If Brown wins, it is our view that Obamacare will not pass Congress," Avik Roy, a healthcare analyst with Monnes Crespi Hardt, said in a research note.

The Morgan Stanley Healthcare Payor Index and the AMEX Pharmaceutical index outperformed the broader market, rising 2.3 percent and 2.0 percent, respectively.

HIGH TURNOUT COULD HELP ENERGIZED REPUBLICANS

Massachusetts Secretary of State William Galvin said he was bracing for voting levels similar to that of a regular state election given the intense interest in the race.

That view was borne out as voters braved drizzle and light snow to get to the ballot box. Local media reported long lines at some polling places.

High turnout could benefit the more energized Brown campaign, even though registered Democrats in Massachusetts hold a sizable numerical advantage.

Democratic Party icon Edward Kennedy, who held the seat for almost 47 years, died in August of brain cancer. Democrat Paul Kirk was appointed by the state's governor in September to occupy Kennedy's seat and will remain in the Senate until a winner is sworn in.

Massachusetts last elected a Republican to the Senate in 1972, but the weak economy and doubts about the healthcare overhaul have moved voters to abandon political loyalties.

Their possible change of heart could not have come at a more crucial juncture for Obama.

Democrats now control 60 votes in the Senate to 40 for the Republicans. The loss of one seat could hamper the Democrats' ability to cut off debate and proceed to a vote on the planned healthcare overhaul. Brown has promised to be the Republican's 41st vote to kill healthcare legislation.

More broadly, an upset in Massachusetts, or even a narrow win for Coakley, would raise the specter of large losses for Democrats in midterm congressional elections in November.

'ANGER AND FRUSTRATION'

The Republican has attracted strong support from independent voters, including many who backed Obama in 2008.

"There's an anger, a frustration that's being felt in Massachusetts," said James Gomes, director of the Mosakowski Institute for Public Enterprise at Clark University in Massachusetts.

A number of polls over the past week have shown Brown edging ahead, although mostly within the margin of error for each survey. The nonpartisan Cook Political Report judged the race a toss-up.

In Washington, House of Representatives Democratic Leader Steny Hoyer said he expected Coakley to win but he understood why voters were unhappy. "It's a tough time to have a special election because people are angry," he said.

Millions of dollars have flooded into the state to buy nonstop television advertising for both sides, transforming a relatively sleepy contest into a bitter brawl.

Coakley has been criticized for a lackluster campaign. She took almost a week off from the campaign trail around Christmas, at a time when Brown's appeal was on the rise.

(Editing by Eric Beech and Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (49)
AngryMobVoter wrote:
Let’s put this in perspective:

Imagine two ordinary Americans that are almost identical and have so called “Cadillac” health plans. Imagine the significant difference between these two Americans is one is a union member and one is not. The American who is not a union member will pay a tax on his health plan while the other will not. That is DISCRIMINATION! Is that the change the American people voted for? Obama and the Congress lied about the transparency and bipartisanship. It is time to VOTE THEM OUT!!!

Imagine an ordinary American who has a chronic health condition like heart disease, kidney disease, diabetes, or one of many other chronic conditions. This person seeks out an employer who offers a “Cadillac” health plan to cover his substantial health care expenses. Now this Congress and Obama will tax that person for seeking out a plan that best meets his healthcare needs. Of course he only pays the tax if he is NOT a union member. Is that the change the American people voted for? Obama and the Congress lied about the transparency and bipartisanship. It is time to VOTE THEM OUT!!!

Obama and Congress are not doing the work of the American People and they are not listening to the will of the people. They will use any means no matter how dirty to ram this bill into law. The American people need to come together and VOTE THEM OUT!!!

Jan 19, 2010 7:17am EST  --  Report as abuse
BOBBY99 wrote:
Forget Cadillac and just have Single Payer Universal Health where if you want cosmetic surgury to look better, you can buy it.

Just take the thievies middleman insurance out, out, out.

bobby99

Jan 19, 2010 7:29am EST  --  Report as abuse
JerryBoldezar wrote:
THE PEOPLE SPEAK.

THE CONSTITUTION PROVIDES THE PEOPLE WITH THE RIGHT TO SHIFT OUR GOVERNMENT TO THE WAY TO THEY WANT TO GO.

ISN’T IT GREAT. THE PEOPLE GET THEIR WAY. POWER TO THE PEOPLE.

JERRY BOLDEZAR
SOUTH LONDONDERRY, VT

Jan 19, 2010 7:32am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.