Read
- Survivors pulled from Oklahoma tornado debris as toll falls
|
- Analysis: Some Republicans see new scandal in Sebelius fundraising
- Convicted U.S. killer Arias would join tiny death row group
- Drop in U.S. underground water levels has accelerated -USGS
- Israel fires back at Syria after gunshots at its troops
Sponsored Links
UPDATE 1-Chevron's Richmond refinery likely to close -paper
* $1 bln upgrade of S.F. area refinery halted last July
* Columnist says Chevron looked at refinery sale last year
* Chevron hopes to continue Richmond operations -spokesman
* Refinery has 240,000 bpd capacity, ranked 21st in U.S. (Adds Chevron spokesman's comments, industry background, details on Richmond refinery)
SAN FRANCISCO, Jan 20 (Reuters) - Chevron Corp (CVX.N) is
likely to close its oldest refinery, in Richmond, California,
in a wider restructuring of downstream operations, the local
newspaper's business editor wrote in a column on Wednesday.
The second-largest U.S. oil company halted work on a $1 billion upgrade of Richmond last July after a state judge ordered it, agreeing with environmentalists who brought a lawsuit that the refinery's environmental impact report was incomplete. The company later filed an appeal. [ID:nN20122859]
Chevron said on Tuesday it planned to cut refinery jobs and exit some markets, and the Contra Costa Times business editor, Drew Voros, expects details to be unveiled in March to include the closure of the 108-year-old refinery.
"If Chevron had been allowed to complete the retrofit in Richmond, there would be a strong fiscal argument to keep it open. Instead, there is a strong fiscal argument to close it," Voros concluded in his column for the paper, serving the county that is home to Richmond and Chevron's San Ramon headquarters.
Chevron spokesman Lloyd Avram said the company had not yet made any announcements on assets, jobs or markets.
"We've operated in Richmond for more than 100 years, and we would hope to continue operating," he said of the San Francisco Bay refinery, which has capacity to refine more than 240,000 barrels of crude a day, ranking it 21st in the United States.
A Richmond closure would be only the latest response by refiners to a devastating squeeze on margins due to demand weakened by the economy, coupled with high crude oil prices.
Leading U.S. refiner Valero Energy Corp (VLO.N) said in
November it would close its plant in Delaware City, Delaware,
three months after indefinitely shutting its Aruba refinery.
Sunoco Inc SUN.N has idled its plant in Eagle Point, New
Jersey.
Chevron said last week it expected to report sharply lower refining earnings for the fourth quarter, and highlighted a $4 drop in U.S. West Coast refining margins.
Stricter regulations in California, in particular, historically have contributed to relatively fatter margins for refined products in the state, but the West Coast premium over the U.S. Gulf Coast disappeared last quarter.
Chevron's largest U.S. refinery is on the Gulf Coast, in Pascagoula, Mississippi, while its second-largest is about 400 miles down the coast from Richmond, in El Segundo, California.
Voros cited sources at Chevron who said last year that the company had talks with Chinese buyers who would have dismantled and shipped the Richmond refinery to China, while the land would be kept as an offloading facility for refined products.
Just this month, larger rival Royal Dutch Shell Plc
(RDSa.L) said it would transform its Montreal East refinery
into a fuel terminal.
Richmond sits at the southern end of a water artery that gives tankers direct access from the Pacific Ocean to smaller refineries in Rodeo, owned by ConocoPhillips (COP.N); Benicia, owned by Valero; and Martinez, where one is owned by Shell and the other by Tesoro Corp (TSO.N). (Reporting by Braden Reddall, editing by Gerald E. McCormick)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
anagnorisis wrote:
Does the state of California and the city of Richmond really know the impact of a refinery closure? The city of Richmond needs to seriously rethink its stand. In other words stop biting the hand that feeds you. As Californias biggest employer a refinery closure will be the final nail in our states economic demise.
rdepatta wrote:
I am a retired Chevron employee who can’t believe they would actually close the Richmond Refinery. If it happens the community would colapse even further. North Richmond is a den of violence and across the hiway, point RIchmond is a gem in the rough. Point Richmond would loose millions in revinue and it would not be long before it becomes a ghost town. The county needs to rethink it’s stand on Chevron as thousands of employe’s would be unemployed adding to the already depressed city. It’s time for Chevron to step up and challenge this great injustice
to the community and all of their employees. This refinery is the heart and soul of Richmond and believe me if it closes watch the fuel prices rise quickly. Please workout an alternative plan to continue refining in Richmond as it affects all of us. God Bless America.
to the community and all of their employees. This refinery is the heart and soul of Richmond and believe me if it closes watch the fuel prices rise quickly. Please workout an alternative plan to continue refining in Richmond as it affects all of us. God Bless America.
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.


Follow Reuters