U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Europe welcomes Obama bank plan, won't imitate it

Related Topics

1 of 3. President Obama speaks about financial reform after his meeting with Presidential Economic Recovery Advisory Board Chair Paul Volcker at the White House, January 21, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

LONDON/PARIS | Fri Jan 22, 2010 4:55pm EST

LONDON/PARIS (Reuters) - Major European economies offered support on Friday for U.S. President Barack Obama's plan to limit banks' size and trading activities but indicated they had no plans to follow suit.

Obama's dramatic proposals could rewrite the world financial order but experts said they were light on detail and could cloud the global approach fostered by the Group of 20 nations.

The European Union will not imitate Obama's plan, because it aims to reduce risk in the sector through other means, an EU source said on Friday.

"Look, we understand the U.S. position and we understand his reasons. But I can't see the EU going down this route," the source, who is close to EU financial policymaking, told Reuters.

"The U.S. finds itself a little behind us on this. The Obama plan is not fit for the purpose in the EU."

Obama made his proposals on Thursday, saying he was ready to fight resistance from Wall Street banks he blamed for helping cause the global financial crisis.

The plan would prevent banks from investing in, owning or sponsoring a hedge fund or private equity fund.

It would set a new limit on banks' size in relation to the overall financial sector and, perhaps most dramatically, could also bar institutions from proprietary trading operations, which are unrelated to serving customers, for their own profit.

Proprietary trading involves firms making bets on markets with their own money and has been the source of much of banks' bumper profits before and after the financial crisis.

French Economy Minister Christine Lagarde welcomed the proposal, saying it was a "very, very good step forward."

UK Treasury Minister Paul Myners said Britain already had acted to address problems in its banking industry.

"He's developing a solution to what he sees as the American issues, we've already taken the necessary action in the UK," Myners said in an interview with Reuters Insider TV.

But Britain's opposition Conservatives, tipped by polls to win an election to be held by June, offered more solid support.

"President Obama has created a lot of space for the rest of the world to come up with what I think would be a sensible system of international rules," Conservative finance spokesman George Osborne told BBC Radio.

"I have said consistently that we should look at separating retail banking from activities like large-scale propriety trading and that this was best done internationally."

DOUBTS REMAIN

Doubts remain as to whether Obama's scheme can be enacted unchanged, not least since his party lost a key Senate seat this week, depriving it of a "super majority" in that house.

But it will strike a popular chord.

Banks' return to paying massive bonuses has prompted public and media outrage in the United States and Europe after taxpayer money was used to bail out many of them.

Wall Street sold off on Thursday and the threat that other countries will follow Obama's lead rattled European lenders.

The EU source, who declined to be named, said the 27-nation bloc would focus on raising banks' capital requirements and tightening financial regulation, pursuing initiatives already under way in the European Parliament.

"The Obama plan is really back to the future. These sort of plans were implemented after the Great Depression and then taken away in the '60s. He is sort of reinstating the same plans to deal with this crisis," the source said.

"What is key to remember is that the U.S. is one market, the EU is 27 markets and we are trying to encourage cross-border financial services and more importantly consolidation in both national and trans-national markets. The Obama plan would be anti-competitive in EU terms."

The source said most top banks in the world were American or had roots there, so it was understandable that Obama wanted to curb their size.

"The EU does not have so many 'too big to fail' institutions, to be honest. Also, we have already started restructuring of our banks, forcing them to downsize, sell off units and open up to newcomers."

WILL IT FLY?

Washington will have to gain worldwide support for its measures or risk international banks fleeing its shores.

In September, a summit of Group of 20 leaders hosted by Obama called for crackdowns on bankers' bonuses and a build-up in banks' capital.

But while there are still signs of international intent, different centers are increasingly pursuing different paths.

An official involved in the global regulation process said many in Europe were caught on the hop.

"Everybody was coordinating their work through the G20, the Financial Stability Board and the Basel Committee," the official said. "Nobody knows the details or whether other countries may follow. This is creating regulatory confusion."

The German finance ministry stressed the need to move forward internationally and said Berlin would present its own proposals on improving banking regulation.

"We see the new proposals as a helpful suggestion for the continuing discussions on an international level. And we're obviously aiming to find a solution to the problem of the 'too big to fail' issue," ministry spokesman Michael Offer said.

Spain's deputy prime minister Maria Teres Fernandez de la Vega said her country shared Obama's views about the causes of the crisis but that each country should take its own measures.

The European response echoed that to Obama's announcement last week that Wall Street banks should pay a levy of up to $117 billion to reimburse taxpayers for their bailout.

Britain, France and Germany extolled the idea but said they had their own plans and would not follow suit.

London and Paris plan a 50 percent tax on bank bonuses.

On the other side of the coin, the International Monetary Fund has been tasked to look at a global tax on financial transactions, proposed by Britain's Gordon Brown late last year and supported by European Union leaders.

The U.S. administration is opposed to that.

(Writing by Mike Peacock, Editing by Lin Noueihed)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
breezinthru wrote:
Every investor in America, every single person with a pension or retirement savings has had a significant amount of their money skimmed from their accounts by large banks… not just in management fees but much more effectively by transactions conducted by high-speed algorithms.

This has been going on for years; consider for a moment the effect of interest compounding over time.

The best and brightest tech experts money can buy are grabbing vast sums of money from investor accounts ever more effectively as their programs become increasingly sophisticated.

Consider how quickly the largest banks have been able to repay loans of nearly a trillion dollars.

What was it? About 3 years since they were on life support?

Where are did they get that kind of money?

Either from their loan portfolios (mortgages and credit card loans)…

or from money made by the investing side of their operations.

Hmmm… Those guys must get those big bonuses because they are really, really good at predicting which stocks to buy and which stocks to sell!

Folks, Bernie Madoff wasn’t even that good and his books had nothing to do with reality!

So, it’s our retirement money, yours and mine, that is churning through those algorithms and enriching the banks.

That would mean that Obama is playing a game of chicken with the banks.

Banks are still drowning in red ink on the loan side of their businesses. Their only remaining money stream is their ill-gotten algorithm-skimmed investment money… your investment money.

If Obama makes those guys play fair with our retirement money, making sure that each individual investor’s money isn’t siphoned off by the algorithms…

the banks will fail again.

I’ll bet that you’re thinking about the same thing I ma right now.

Jan 21, 2010 8:55pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Realtime wrote:
Obama is dealing with the most powerful – he has no idea what he will stir up. First they will attempt to delay, lobby, and avoid. If it gets the push then Obama will get the push and in no small way. History has shown this sector will stop at nothing. Already it will be conspiring in the boardrooms to undo Obama and his status.

Jan 21, 2010 11:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
greg_usa wrote:
Well done President Obama.

I prefer not to have my bank use my savings and deposits for their speculative investments, thank you very much! Using my money without my permission to gamble on investments that may result in a profit for only their account while I unwittingly carry the risk, what a cheek!

Hopefully, President O will see through the manner in which the market spikes hugely up and down as part of the manipulation by dealers and trading institutions to operate the market like a casino designed to take out short term speculators. For example, at 17:30 on 21-01-2010 the Dow Jones 30 cash index spiked for a brief moment from below 10400 to 10722. You wont find this on the smoothed daily charts but it is on the detailed minute by minute charts. Thank goodness, i did not have a short trade on at that moment as it killed all short traders with a margin less than 300 points+- in a matter of minutes. This is a regular pattern, though not often to this extreme.

A thorough investigation is required into the mechanism of the financial markets and government monitoring is required to prevent commercial fraud on a mass scale.

Jan 22, 2010 4:01am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.