U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

White House: spending freeze may slow Obama agenda

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Tue Jan 26, 2010 3:54pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama may take more time to deliver on some of his policy promises in light of a proposed spending freeze but is still committed to his core agenda, White House officials said on Tuesday.

Obama is seeking a three-year freeze on some domestic programs in his 2011 budget that would save $250 billion by 2020, raising questions over his ability to fulfill expensive promises that range from healthcare reform -- already up in the air politically -- to revamping U.S. energy use.

"The president's objectives haven't really changed," said Rob Nabors, deputy director of the White House's Office of Management and Budget, on a conference call with reporters.

"There are a number of areas, however, where we made commitments to do things over four, five years that will ... perhaps take us six or seven years now."

Specifically, Nabors said the administration would still be focused on "creating an economy that will work in the 21st century," improving the U.S. education system and investing in "clean" energy technology.

"We are slowing the growth of some of these programs while at the same time eliminating things ... that really aren't priorities," Nabors said.

"We're going to be working to perhaps lengthen the amount of time necessary to achieve some of the goals that the president has laid out."

Obama will outline details of the proposed cut in his State of the Union address on Wednesday and in the unveiling of his budget on February 1.

If the freeze hits key domestic programs, that would draw criticism from Obama's Democrats, many of whom are disappointed that promises he made as a presidential candidate have not been met. But if it does not affect spending on Obama's domestic priorities, the White House will likely face criticism from Republicans for not doing enough to tackle the deficit.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs, while declining to give details on what programs would be scaled back or eliminated, said the budget would match Obama's policy goals.

"The president will cut programs that are duplicative or serve what he believes is no important purpose, and invest in, as families do, investments for the future," he said.

Gibbs said the proposed cuts would not undermine the U.S. economic recovery and that Obama stood by his pledge to halve the U.S. deficit by the end of his current term in office in 2013.

Obama's proposed budget savings will need congressional backing and would exclude Defense, Veterans Affairs, Homeland Security and international affairs spending, according to administration officials.

The United States ran a record $1.4 trillion budget deficit in fiscal year 2009. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the deficit for the current fiscal year will come in at $1.35 trillion.

(additional reporting by Alister Bull; editing by Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
amacd wrote:
David Brooks’ column in today’s NYT conflates current American populism as “punishing the elites” — whereas it’s really the same as colonial American populism in ‘exposing and confronting EMPIRE’ with democracy.

Here’s how Obama could win a second term, or four like FDR (if it were still legal) and be as popular as George Washington for winning the Revolution against the British Empire, if he has the guts to level with the American people (and coincidentally save our democracy):

Here’s the single, seminal, and underlying ‘cause’ of all these problematic ‘issues’ that Obama has to level with the American people about to restore his credibility, and coincidentally save our democracy: —- its not health care, nor the economy, nor the wars, nor the hundred other distractive symptomatic ‘identity issues’ that are ALL caused by the exact same hidden metastasizing tumor of cancer.

It begins with an ‘E’, but “its not the Economy stupid” —- it’s EMPIRE.

In his “State of the (democratic) Union’ he should forcefully point out that today we’re almost totally controlled by a previously well hidden corporatist EMPIRE — now made more visible by the supreme court’s treason of literally handing over our country to the Empire overtly.

While this problem can not be solved by any quick legislative or other means, that he will actually ‘lead’ and solve this (and all our other problems caused by Empire) and he will do it by moving to the Green (independent) Party (which does not accept corrupting corporate Empire money), and then Obama should challenge all those he is addressing in Congress, who have the guts to represent us (and the U.S.) to follow him and shun the hopelessly corrupted and ‘bought’ Dem/Rep single corporate Empire’s two-faced phony party.

Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine

Jan 26, 2010 1:40pm EST  --  Report as abuse
vintel7 wrote:
The people of the United States don’t know which way is up and don’t know what they want. The simple facts are that the entire health care industry has been sticking it to consumers for years. Why? Because they know we need health care to stay alive. It really is quite slimy. Great business to work in. I have been working in the medical device business for years where the profit margins are routinely 3-4 times what they are in consumer products. Here again, this is because they know they have you. The President is absolutely correct. This system will bankrupt the USA in due time.It is inevitable. Incomes simply do not keep up with inflation. Why? Because the people at the top…you know the people the republicans represent…the people with money….they increase their profits and do not pass on any savings. Laissez-fare economics does not work and never has for this very reason. GREED. So The President and the Dems are truly trying to do the right thing. It is just that Americans are in a panic. Why is the economy as bad as it is? It’s because the American people were asleep and allowed Bush and the Republicans to send all of our manufacturing base to China. Of course our economy is bad. The very infrastructure of our economy is no longer in place to support all other asoects of the economy. It is really quite simple….yet Americans don’t get it. Americans are sleeping….caught up in the American dream or should I say nightmare. Americans being a fickle lousy bunch, now have decided they dont want health care if it costs money. DUH. Everything of value costs money. This is why Climate Change legislation wont pass until it is much too late. Americans are too stupid and lazy and forgetful of the incompetent creeps that led us into this morass…that would be the Republicans…when they and Bush sold us out to China. Good bye America.

Jan 26, 2010 3:11pm EST  --  Report as abuse
vintel7 wrote:
Great post Alan MacDonald. I would have to agree with you. I would add that Americans have grown complacent and intellectually lazy. A President these days is practically powerless. Everybody is thrilled that Scott Brown won in Massachusetts but those of us in the know…know it doesn’t matter. Politics in Ma. are controlled by the corporate empire and by the unions and the Irish mob. Scott Brown has probably already discovered that he is a powerless puppet. Brown will be gone in 2 years. Americans have unrealistic expectations for what a President is supposed to do. What do they think? That the President is going to snap his fingers and fix every crises overnight? It took more than 10 years for FDR to work his way through the Great Depression. Yet Americans expect instant results and it just doesn’t happen that way. Americans are like a bunch of spoiled children who are getting a shocking good dose of reality.

Jan 26, 2010 3:16pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.