Israel "responsible" on Iran, Obama adviser says

JERUSALEM Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:49pm EST

U.S. National Security Advisor General Jim Jones speaks to reporters in the briefing room at the White House in Washington May 6, 2009. At left is White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. National Security Advisor General Jim Jones speaks to reporters in the briefing room at the White House in Washington May 6, 2009. At left is White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Topics

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel and the United States are closely conferring about the Iranian nuclear program, U.S. National Security Adviser Jim Jones said in an interview published Sunday, calling Israel's conduct "responsible."

Western governments fear that Iran wants to produce nuclear weapons but Tehran says the program is for peaceful purposes. Iran has vowed to respond to any unilateral Israeli strike over the nuclear program.

The five permanent Security Council members -- the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China -- along with Germany have been negotiating with Iran, but U.S. officials say drafts of possible sanctions should circulate among the group soon.

Jones said the United States and Israel are in close coordination over how to handle Iran. "We have very good dialogue with Israel, continual dialogue," he told The Jerusalem Post. "We're working very closely with them."

Asked whether Washington was concerned about Israel trying to take on its arch-foe alone, Jones said: "Our Israeli partners are very responsible."

Michael Oren, Israel's envoy to the United States, said last month the military option "was not a subject of discussion."


The Obama administration is eyeing the possibility of a fourth round of U.N. Security Council sanctions against Iran -- despite the past misgivings of Russia and China.

Iran rejects Western charges that its nuclear program has military designs, and has vowed to retaliate with ballistic missiles for any strikes on its facilities by Israel, which is assumed to have the Middle East's only atomic arsenal.

Israel says a nuclear-armed Iran would be a threat to its existence and points to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's calls for the Jewish state to be wiped off the map.

Addressing a Washington think-tank Friday, Jones envisaged Iran trying to distract from the diplomatic pressure by ordering proxy attacks from its Islamist guerrilla allies on the Jewish state's borders.

"When regimes are feeling pressure, as Iran is internally and will externally in the near future, it often lashes out through its surrogates, including, in Iran's case, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza," Jones told the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

"As pressure on the regime in Tehran builds over its nuclear program, there is a heightened risk of further attacks against Israel," he added.

Israel went to war against Hezbollah in 2006 and against Palestinian Hamas a year ago, and considers both groups to have been cowed by its super firepower.

But Israeli officials agree that Hezbollah, and to a lesser degree Hamas, would launch cross-border rocket salvoes on Iran's behalf should it come under attack.

Such a scenario featured in an Israeli-U.S. air defense exercise last year. Israel is this week hosting the deputy commander of the U.S. European Command, who will inspect anti-missile facilities, an Israeli military spokeswoman said.

(Writing by Dan Williams)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (6)
Why does Reuters always insist on turning a headline involving Israel in a negitive tone. This is a positive article yet, the headline is confusing to say the least. This is not the first time I’ve seen this from Reuters. The wording is so twisted in this headline that you must have worked very hard to do it. I read it because I like Israel and wanted to see how it was involved with “responsibility” as you put it in parenthises and Iran in the same sentence. People who hate Israel just read the headline and think wrongly. Stop doing this or get out of the “News Biz” Your headlines are more comentary and I personaly don’t appreciate the tone.

Jan 31, 2010 2:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Watermoon wrote:
Good point. Now if we could only say the same for the Obama administration – especially today after they are beginning to virtually concede the bomb to Iran. If Israel is truly responsible they will blow that corrupt regime off teh face of the earth before the crackpot makes good on his threat to do so to them. Don’t fret Obama. He is all talk and we real Americans will be sure that his teleprompter has him be okay with the action once the dust settles.

Jan 31, 2010 5:31pm EST  --  Report as abuse
miecal wrote:
I don’t see anything in parentheses except for the word Reuters….

Jan 31, 2010 7:57pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.