Could Illinois' Senate race copy Massachusetts?

CHICAGO Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:22am EST

Related Topics

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Buoyed by their surprise Senate victory in Massachusetts, Republicans in President Barack Obama's home state of Illinois sense the Senate seat he left vacant is ripe for their picking come November elections.

Obama's Democrats have long dominated Illinois politics. But Republicans view their man Scott Brown's capture in January of the late Edward Kennedy's seat in Massachusetts as a sign of voter dismay with Democrats in the White House and Congress.

Public opinion polls ahead of Tuesday's party primaries in Illinois show five-term U.S. Representative Mark Kirk likely to win the Republican nomination easily.

Favored to win the Democratic primary and face off Kirk for the vacant seat is Alexi Giannoulias, Illinois treasurer and Obama's basketball-playing buddy.

"The Democratic candidates are second-tier. They're not particularly exciting, not particularly experienced," DePaul University political analyst Michael Mezey said.

Kirk has lent his own twist to Brown's best-known line in the campaign, saying: "This is not Obama's seat, it's the people's seat."

One poll showed Kirk trailing Giannoulias if the two face off -- but only narrowly. That's a far cry from the 62 percent of Illinois voters who cast ballots for Obama against 37 percent for the Republican John McCain in November 2008.

Because Kirk has been in the House of Representatives since 2000, and because of his moderate stances on some issues, he is less able to take advantage of the anti-incumbent fervor among some voters that likely helped Brown.

"Kirk is not the kind of candidate to get the Tea Partiers' blood running," Mezey said, referring to a nascent movement of fiscal conservatives. "He's a moderate, middle-of-the-road candidate. He's been pro-choice, pro-gay rights, anti-gun."

Roosevelt University political analyst Paul Green said: "These Tea Party guys are riding high right now. But Illinois is a coffee state; there aren't going to be a lot of tea drinkers here."

What had once been considered a safe Senate seat for the Democrats, the vacant Illinois seat has become one of five "toss-up" races where Democrats are in danger of losing, according to the Cook Political Report.

Two other Senate seats where Democratic incumbents are not running again -- in Delaware and North Dakota -- are likely to switch to the Republican column, while four Republican-held Senate seats are considered toss-ups, the Cook Report said.

Each party has 18 Senate seats up for election. Republicans now hold 41 and Democrats 57, with two independents usually voting with the Democrats in the 100-seat chamber.

Brown's victory cost the Democrats their 60-vote threshold that had permitted the party to overcome Republican procedural roadblocks.

DEMOCRATS DOMINATE

Over the past 40 years, Illinois has had seven Democratic and two Republican U.S. senators -- the last Republican was moderate Peter Fitzgerald who retired in 2005 after just one term. Democrats hold all major state-wide offices and are in the majority in both houses of the Illinois legislature.

Recent political setbacks for Democrats include an indicted and impeached governor, Rod Blagojevich, and a state government seemingly paralyzed by expanding budget deficits.

Blagojevich's corruption trial is set to begin in June, making headlines as the Senate campaign gets into full swing.

"The Illinois seat is going to be top of the Republican priority list, not for symbolic reasons that it's Obama's home state, but because it's one of the most likely seats for them to win," said political analyst Dick Simpson of the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Simpson predicted an expensive, bruising campaign for the seat occupied by Roland Burris, a Blagojevich appointee who is not running. Among the charges against Blagojevich is that he tried to sell the seat after Obama was elected president.

(Editing by Mohammad Zargham and Howard Goller)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
JFS_PA wrote:
Giannoulias’ numbers are high in his own primary, and he leads modestly in the general election, where his numbers are acutally rising…but they may be limited in the general election by a past bank scandal that he’s somehow being connected to. Two other Democratic Candidates, Cheryle Jackson and David Hoffman, polled neck-and-neck with Kirk (and their numbers are also rising) but the question is whether these two “clean” candidates will do anything but split the primary and hand the election to Giannoulias. However, Hoffman now has the endorsements of the Trib and the Sun Times. Jackson has had the backing of Emily’s List, has strong connections to core urban voters (black and white) and is currently sitting second in a fairly fluid field. Some of the Tea Party types are indeed beating the “send Washington a message” drum, while others are decrying Kirk as a “RINO” (”republican in name only.”) My hopes are behind Ms. Robinson Jackson, but as for betting, all I can say is “Should be interesting.”

Jan 31, 2010 12:07pm EST  --  Report as abuse
markson wrote:
Another reminder of the entrenchment and blatant corruption of the democratic party in Illinois,perhaps more revulsive than that in Mass. and of the fact that this is the birthplace of Mr. Obama’s political life. Can a purse be made from sow’s ear?

Jan 31, 2010 12:35pm EST  --  Report as abuse
chazman wrote:
Scott Brown and Mark Kirk could not be more different….if Kirk is nominated conservatives will avoid the Illinois general race in droves.

Jan 31, 2010 2:33pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.